“highly significant”

Intriguingly, in EBV-positive patients, the difference in DFS between SPC-prognosis groups was highly significant [HR: 2.608 (0.735–9.254) in intermediate-risk, 17.656 (3.839–81.200) in high-risk group, log-rank p <0.001], necessitating further investigation.

The percentage rise in cuff pressure every 10 minutes was also highly significant ( P < 0.001) being maximum in first 10 min in group N.

In the fully adjusted ANCOVA model, the diagnostic group effect for BDNF remained highly significant after controlling for age, sex, education level, BMI and smoking status (F = 11804.71, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.989).

Qualitative analysis Low EI was associated with SMES depression and the identified association was highly significant (p = 0.001, OR = 2.050, 95% CI = 1.371-3.063) (Figure 3 ).

A highly significant difference of the ES distributions between these two groups was observed ( p < 0.001).

It could be observed that the three factors A, B and C were all highly significant ( P < 0.001).

There was highly significant difference in the mean values of SPO 2 , pulse rate, and PEFR between the test and control participants with P < 0.001.

It yielded a highly significant overall effect of r = 0.18 ( p < .001, 95% CI [0.15, 0.20]).

The prediction accuracy is highly significant ( P -value <0.001, permutation testing), confirming that the temporal decoding variability effectively relates to behavior.

Significant difference was indicated by * ( P < 0.05), highly significant difference was indicated by ** ( P < 0.01) and extremely significant difference was indicated by *** ( P < 0.001). 5.

The influence of the genotype factor on the degree of migration was highly significant, as revealed by two-way ANOVA ( F (1, 32) =55.842, p<0.001).

The difference in heart rate between control and lignocaine groups remains highly significant at all times of assessment ( P < 0.001).

Effect of therapy on chief complaints In Group A, highly significant results were obtained in Grahana Shakti Hani ( P ≤ 0.001) and Twak Hani ( P ≤ 0.001), while significant result was found in Smarana Shakti Hani ( P = 0.004).

Antioxidants Capacity The antioxidant capacity assessed by the CUPRAC method showed a highly significant difference between the two GH populations ( p < 0.001).

For working memory manipulation, digit symbol was a highly significant covariate ( F 1,100 = 16.01, P < .001), but the difference between the 2 groups remained significant ( F 1,100 = 8.62, P = .004).

Statistical paired analyses, conducted to assess the impact of ultrasound guidance on injection accuracy, revealed a highly significant effect ( p < 0.001).

The difference is highly significant ( p <0.001).

Hence, SP-7, with a pH of 7.2 ± 0.1, had a trend for higher values than CON-0 ( p = 0.07), CIDR-7 ( p < 0.05) and CIDR-14 ( p = 0.05), while the differences were highly significant when assessing the SP-14 group, with a pH of 8.0 ± 0.2, against SP-7 ( p < 0.001) and CON-0, CIDR-7 and CIDR-14 ( p < 0.00001 for all).

Larvae fed South African Bt maize had much higher survival (about 80%) than larvae fed Spanish Bt maize (below 40%) ( Figure 2 , left panel), the differences were highly significant ( p < 0.001, coxph test).

The fact that rrTNBC versus srTNBC differences in median DFS, PFI, PRS, and OS remained highly significant (all p < 0.001) in both the overall cohort and the platinum-subgroup indicates that the prognostic impact of the rrTNBC phenotype is robust and independent of treatment line or regimen selection.

This resulted in less overlap between the 95% data ranges of the lower iodine concentrations, as can be appreciated from the linear relationships depicted in Figure 20 , which is a comparison of R 2 values, demonstrating the highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) between the methods without DAC-shifting and with DAC-shifting. 4.

Lastly, the multivariate analysis showed a highly significant positive correlation between cytokine IL-10 levels at the baseline and after one year of DRT in PD patients (r = 0.71, p < 0.001) and in controls (r = 0.66, p < 0.01) ( Figure 3 A,B).

The mean deviation of surface roughness SMD gets highly significant correlation value ( p < 0.001) to tensile properties.

This showed a highly significant correlation between genes’ expression levels, which were determined by the two methods (Pearson R = 0.913, p < 0.001; Figure S2 ).

Results Our results showed highly significant increase in the level of lipid peroxidation in group IV when com pared to the control group, group II and group III (p<0.001).