While SF-1 expression in MUC-1 (100 ± 0.0%) and NCI-H295R (78.3± 12.3%) was comparable (p=n.s.), we detected a highly significant SF-1 overexpression in the pediatric ACC tumor model SJ-ACC3 (348.2± 27.4%, p < 0.001 vs.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
There were large, highly significant improvements in patient ratings when reading the summary versus the original report ( P <.001).
Significant differences were observed across all ROIs (NC, CC, and TC) with highly significant t -values ( t = −9.034 to −9.851, p < 0.001).
Formal comparison of the survival curves using the Mantel–Haenszel test leads to a highly significant result ( P < 0.001).
Concurrently, IL-35 levels in GCF increased progressively and significantly, with a highly significant post-therapy elevation ( p < 0.001) [ 75 ].
At 14 d post feeding (dpf), 69.2% of wild type mosquitoes were infected with DENV, whereas only 16.7% of w AlbB2-F4 mosquitoes were infected, representing a highly significant reduction (Fisher’s Exact test, P < 0.001, Fig 2A ).
Both contrast agents showed a highly significant negative correlation ( p < 0.001) with X-ray tube voltage, with barium sulfate exhibiting approximately twice the sensitivity to kV changes in tube voltage compared to iohexol.
The results of the structural model for the mediation analysis are presented in Figure 2 ; the results show that the coefficients for each path in the model were highly significant ( p < 0.001).
There was a significant effect of cue condition, F (2, 64) = 8.323, p = .001, η p 2 = .206, and a linear contrast respecting the predicted order of cues (ISI, NI, FSI) was highly significant, F (2, 64) = 8.323, p = .001, η p 2 = .206 (see Figure 1 ).
FBG levels increased progressively across all clusters with a highly significant trend ( p < 0.001).
Among food preparation, sushi preparation showed a highly significant positive effect (β = 0.5814, p < 0.001) compared to smoked salmon, while grilled preparation demonstrated a marginally significant preference (β = 0.0879, p = 0.070).
Administration of 3-NP alone shows motor abnormalities, decreased locomotor counts, loss of memory in EPM, decreased motor coordination in beam walking test, decreased hanging latency on hanging wire test and even 3-NP alone treatment resulted in highly significant ( p < 0.001) reduction in body weight.
This difference was highly significant ( χ 2 = 96.522, p < 0.001).
The decrease in TSPYL5 protein expression was found to be highly significant between RWPE-1 and DU145 ( P = 0.001) while moderate difference was observed between RWPE-1 and LNCaP, ( P = 0.04) cells.
This difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001, binomial test) and indicated that HAT-PCR was more sensitive than flow.
Compared to women who were never pregnant, women with a history of pregnancy had substantially higher odds of testing, and this association remained highly significant in adjusted analysis (aOR 6.40, 95% CI: 4.99–8.22, p < 0.001) ( Table 2 ). 3.5.
Furthermore, our analysis revealed a highly significant lower OTU richness in the PAG compared to the RS and the SO (both pairwise comparisons P < 0.001), whereas OTU richness in the RS and SO were not significantly different from each other (Table 2 ).
The analysis of fixed effects revealed that the overall model was highly significant (F(92,36) = 2.758, p < 0.001), indicating that the predictor variables explained a significant portion of the variation in specimen abundance.
598.2 ± 376.4 AU/cm 2 ), demonstrated highly significant differences ( p < 0.001 each) between the groups.
The model provides a highly significant fit as compared to a null model (null −2LL = 11.66, final −2LL = 26.92, χ 2 = 30.52, p < 0.001; Nagelkerke R 2 = 0.73; AIC = 37.32).
The difference between those willing compared to those not willing to be treated was highly significant ( χ 2 = 318.82, P < 0.001). 3.3.
The orientation when moving from one pool site to the next showed a highly significant directionality (expected bearing = 0°, mean bearing = 347.3°, 95% CI = 325°–9.7°, Rayleigh test: P < 0.001, N = 34).
None of the genes showed significant interaction with BMI (results not presented); CDKAL1 *BMI and CAPN10 *BMI interactions were significant only at 10 per cent despite BMI showing highly significant association with the phenotype ( P < 0.001).
On the other hand, the increase of α exponent is large and highly significant (Cohen’s d = 1.07; p < 0.001) in PD participants and evolves in the same way that H exponent (Cohen’s d = 1.05; p < 0.001).
Accordingly, the patients’ evaluation of the information material had a highly significant correlation with patients’ decisions ( p < 0.001).