“highly significant”

Except for the factor loadings of the first indicator of each latent variable (e.g., PC1, IN1, CU1), which are set to a fixed value of 1.000 to achieve model recognition, the nonstandardized path coefficients of the remaining observed variables are statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).

In Saudi females, six equations (hand and finger measurements) were all highly significant ( p < 0.001), with R values from 0.593 to 0.904.

the relationship between excitability score values and percent excitability (percentage of goat with particular excitability score) for different excitability score group 3 h post-transportation was positive and highly significant ( p < 0.001), in both experimental and control goats.

Mandibular cortical index Chi-square analysis revealed a highly significant association between Mandibular Cortical Index (MCI) categories and study groups ( p < 0.001) (Table 2 ).

In all the above tests, P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant; P value >0.05 was taken to be statistically not significant; P value <0.01 was taken to be statistically highly significant and P value <0.001 as very highly significant.

Tables 3 and 4 show statistically significant ( P < 0.05) or highly significant ( P < 0.001) associations between overall QoL and its domains with several sociodemographic and clinical variables, including age, education level, tumor size at diagnosis, income, health insurance, mastectomy, presence of metastases, cancer stage, and treatment type.

Near add power requirements decreased significantly in both groups, from 1.34 ± 0.33 DS to 0.95 ± 0.24 DS in Group A (29.7% reduction) and from 1.36 ± 0.38 DS to 0.84 ± 0.25 DS in Group B (37.8% reduction), with the between-group difference being highly significant ( P < 0.001).

In a linear mixed model, the effect of AirP on RVP was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

All DD coefficients were highly significant from the reference level (P < 0.001).

The replicated cross-validation of the logistic model resulted in a highly significant Spearman-correlation ( p <0.001; correlation coefficient r s = 0.945) between the test and training sets, confirming the model's robustness.

Highly significant genotype by temperature interactions were found (two-way ANOVA, F 4,71 = 12, P <0.001).

In demented persons aged 80–84 and ≥85 years compared with non-demented, the risks of HF were lower (2.2–2.7 and 1.5, respectively) but still highly significant ( p =0.001) for women and for both genders combined.

Smooth term analysis indicated that temporal trends were highly significant in the polluted site (Ambient, polluted: edf = 5.777, p < 0.001; Warmed, polluted: edf = 5.818, p < 0.001), but were non‐significant in the non‐polluted site (SI Table S16 ). 3.2.4 Green Microalgae Concentration For green microalgae, only the June data provided sufficient variation to fit a GLM; on all subsequent sampling dates, concentrations were essentially zero.

A mixed-design ANOVA on the total efficacy score indicated a highly significant main effect of Time, F (1, 479) = 311.17, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.39.

Similarly, comparisons against LightGBM (our strongest non-neural baseline at 0.841 accuracy) demonstrate highly significant advantages ( p < 0.001, 95% CI: [0.046, 0.056]), validating claims that multi-modal fusion provides meaningful benefits beyond optimized gradient boosting approaches.

The model also illustrates that education remains highly significant, with higher education, secondary and primary education groups showing ORs of 2.693, 2.672 and 1.474, respectively (p<0.001 for secondary and higher education).

In terms of sequence identity, all three clades show highly significant genetic divergence from each other (all P < 0.001), indicating they have evolved into three distinct genetic lineages.

The association between this variable and motivation levels was highly significant [ χ 2 (16) = 105.58, p < 0.001, Cramér’s V = 0.14], supporting the hypothesis that ‘higher usage frequency leads to stronger learning motivation’, which aligns with the theoretical connotations of the “Relevance” and “Satisfaction” dimensions in the ARCS model.

The interaction was highly significant ( P <0.001), supporting the SEM result that the effect of larval size on pupal size was strongly modulated by salinity condition ( Table S2 ).

Bartlett’s test was also highly significant, χ 2 (45) = 1668.659, p < 0.001, rejecting the null hypothesis that the correlation matrix is an identity matrix and confirming that the inter-item correlations are sufficient to justify factor analysis.

We also found a highly significant negative correlation between the duration of psoriasis and serum vitamin D level (r = -0.49, P value <0.001) [ Figure 1 ].

Specifically, it demonstrated the largest and most highly significant positive predictive effect on both Social Responsibility ( β = 0.344, p < 0.001 ) and Prosocial Behavior ( β = 0.271, p < 0.001 ).

However, high SFA concentration led to a highly significant increase in NFκB expression in the adipose tissue explants in the presence of L- and H-Glc ( P <.001 and P <.001 respectively; Fig. 2C and 2D ). 3.3 Effects of chronic treatment with SFA and glucose on JNK1 and JNK2 protein expression No statistically significant differences in treatments were obse

However, the interaction effect between the earthquake and the use of CGM device was found to be highly significant ( F = 17.257, P < .001), indicating that the change in HbA1c levels between the 2 time points varied significantly based on whether participants were using CGM device.

The McNemar’s test showed this change to be highly significant ( P < 0.001) [ Table 2 ].