“highly significant”

Firstly, there existed a highly significant relationship between FDU and the diet of Chinese older adults (B = 0.068, SE = 0.022, P < 0.001).

A multivariable logistic regression using only significant predictors in each domain and the CMS category as the dependent outcome identified the oral parameters of the salivary flow rate and PISA as highly significant parameters of the CMS category ( p < 0.001).

Table 4 below presents the detailed reasons for not being on HRT among those non-HRT users. There was a highly significant difference between mean knowledge scores and level of education ( p < 0.001).

Participants were asked, “During the past week, how many times did you play an active sport, such as baseball, softball, basketball, soccer, swimming, or football?” We used χ 2 tests of association to test the relationship between intended sport participation and frequency of playing these sports at W1 and W2 and observed a highly significant association at both W1 (χ 2 = 1007.4, P < .001) and W2 (χ 2 = 696.2, P < .001).

The summary of between-subjects’ effects in Table 1 indicates that both Age and Instruction have a highly significant influence on rate of reading scores ( p < 0.001).

The results demonstrate a highly significant overall effect for weight-age % category (Wald = 16.6, P = .001), age group (Wald = 30.38, P < .001), and ESI (Wald = 140.561, P < .001).

Results: Both TNM7 and PRSC showed highly significant prognostic impact ( p < 0.001 each).

The Pearson intraclass correlation coefficient reliabilities were high (0.897), and the correlations were highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Additionally, a highly significant association between high levels of FBP1 and high tumor cell proliferation rate (Ki-67) (p = 0.001) was noted.

There was a highly significant difference in fGCM concentrations between sites (Kruskal-Wallis test, chi-squared = 15.499, df = 2, p < 0.001), with multiple comparisons showing values from Wildendürnbach to be significantly lower than those at Czech sites, which showed no significant difference.

Results demonstrated that iPFS2 (24.0 months, 95% CI: 19.270–28.730) and OS (38.0 months, 95% CI: 30.074–45.926) for the combination of third-generation TKIs and brain radiotherapy were significantly superior to those for brain radiotherapy alone (iPFS2: 8.0 months, 95% CI: 6.695–9.305; OS: 20.0 months, 95% CI: 24.108–23.116), with a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001; Table 5 , Fig. 6 G-H).

control PDLs, where both TGFBR2 and TIEG showed highly significant correlation with TIMPs-1–3 and MMP-2 (correlation coefficients over 0.66, p < 10 − 3 , Supplementary Document 2 ).

The simplified model showed that the proximity of moga neighbours had a highly significant effect ( z = 9.267, P < 0.001): the rate of aggression by mogas directed to the intruder was much higher when there was a moga territory in the vicinity of the focal convict cichlid territory (Fig. 3 a).

When differentiating the nodules according to texture, it emerged that the correlation of GTV ref and the volume provided by the manufacturer were highly significant for both solid and subsolid volumes: p < 0.001, r = 0.999 and p = 0.009, r = 1.000.

The DeLong test indicated a highly significant difference in AUC between the 8-item GDCS (AUC = 0.936) and the BRASS (AUC = 0.518), with a Z-score of 11.929 and a p -value < 0.001, which demonstrated the substantially better performance of the 8-item GDCS.

For OCT imaging regression analysis showed highly significant results for the absence of vesicles with detached cells (OR 0.01 [0.0006–0.012]; p < 0.001).

In the medial TH, one-way ANOVA indicated a highly significant effect of circadian time on neuronal activation (F 6,23 = 8.47, p < 0.001).

The cohort*time interaction is highly significant (P<0.001).

paratyphi B (3.2%), with a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001).

3 Results When comparing the demographic variables between the groups, the mean age was the oldest in the P + CAD group (51.57 ± 5.19 years), showing a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).

7A ) but was highly significant when pH 3 gastric samples were derived from patients “on PPI” therapy (p = 0.001) (Fig. 7B ).

However, residual heterogeneity remained (τ 2 = 0·280, I 2 = 90·3%), with the test for residual heterogeneity being highly significant (QE = 167·68, df = 23, p < 0·001).

There was a highly significant reduction in clinicians citing they had ‘inadequate knowledge’ to provide counselling (from 43% before GA to 11% of the cohort after GA, p < 0.001), although this remained the most commonly cited explanation of why counselling was not provided or was limited (for 17 sets of parents).

The difference between mdx and WT was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The results showed a highly significant colocalization ( p ≤ 0.001) between recombinant ANKRD55 isoform 001 and either RPS3 ( Figure 7 ) or β-tubulin isoforms ( Figure 8 ) in both the cytoplasm and cell membrane.