“highly significant”

In the principal component analysis of PQS scores, the first detected component, which explained about 32% of the variance of PQS items over time, was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Our findings support these trends as we observed highly significant differences (p<0.001) between the hostility scores of the depressives and the control groups.

The difference between these two values was highly significant (F=50.45, p<0.001).

In Panel A, the association between Lp(a) and SV dilatation is highly significant ( p < 0.001) with potential nonlinearity ( p = 0.077), suggesting increased odds with higher Lp(a) levels.

From Table 10 , it can be observed that the difference among the 10 features of all three time-series matrices under two different EMF exposures is highly significant ( p <0.001), indicating that the differences in the selected time-series features of the zebrafish locomotion are important for the EMF exposure in this study.

This difference is highly significant (x2 = 11.62, p <0.001).

The difference was highly significant (p<0.001).

p -values <0.05 were considered statistically significant at p < 0.01 as highly significant and p < 0.001 as extremely significant. 3 Results 3.1 Celastrol alleviates HCC in an orthotopic HCC rat model We constructed a rat model with orthotopic HCC by treating the rats with DEN and administrated the model rats with celastrol or normal saline in gavage for 10 weeks.

The difference was highly significant in the Mann–Whitney U test ( p < 0.001).

This difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 2 ). 3.3.

Statistical analysis showed that the treatment with 20E, PonA, or MakA, as well as starvation, had a very highly significant, negative effect on larval weight evolution (p < 0.001).

Analysis based on the intervention program revealed that for the resistance + aerobic exercise group, the results of the meta-analysis were highly significant (MD = 3.98; 95% CI: 1.89 to 6.06; I 2 = 98.0%; P < 0.001).

The dmft and DMFT within the four BMI categories by one-way ANOVA were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

PASI showed a highly significant, direct and very strong correlation with severity and vice versa (0.993; p < 0.001 ***). 4.

However, the effect of the sleeve net protection treatment was highly significant ( F = 229.26; df = 1,178; P < 0.001) and cohorts eclosing in the wet season (2 nd brood) had significantly lower survival than those eclosing in the dry season (1 st brood) ( F = 12.49; df = 1,178; P = 0.02).

Assessing the association of individual metabolites of these factors with TJA revealed a highly significant association between Fatty Acid Chain Length (FALen) and Any OA or TJA (P < 0.001).

AMOVA analysis showed highly significant (p < 0.001) genetic differentiation among regions.

The result showed that there was a highly significant difference (P value < 0.001) in the urine iodine content of volunteers before and after consuming iodine enriched eggs.

The term for lantana density in a given cell was found to be highly significant (Likelihood Ratio Test, LR statistic = 52.96, P <0.001), indicating that lantana density in the previous time step was an important predictor of lantana density in the next time step.

The difference in haplogroup distribution between these two regions was highly significant (χ 2 = 15.8; P < 0.001).

The majority of the rat tumors displayed an almost total loss of expression of Gpx3 whereas the non-/pre-malignant endometrial samples displayed a normal/high expression, as also shown by the highly significant difference among malignant and premalignant/normal samples, (p < 0.001, Figure 1 , Table 1 ).

The post-hoc pairwise McNemar test is highly significant (p < 0.001) for all permutations (all frame pairs).

Results were considered statistically significant when P -value≤0.05 and highly significant when P -value≤0.001 [ 30 ].

Overall the statistical association between the hypoplasia of PCoA in relation to sex and side was found to be highly significant ( P <0.001) ( Table 2 ).

Highly significant ( P = 0.001) differences were observed in the structure of the active portion of the microbial community across granule size, regardless of substrate ( Fig. 3 ), with fewer significant differences between the substrate-supplied and no-added-substrate control tests.