“highly significant”

As shown in the leftmost column of Figure 7 A, integrating bin 1–10 together yields highly significant P < 0.001 and q = 6.67E-04 (length = 15–30).

The fixed effect of experiment was always highly significant ( P < 0.001) and is thus never provided.

The ANOVA revealed highly significant individual differences ( p < 0.001) among the items explored by each animal, with partial eta squared ( η 2 p ) values ranging from 0.360 to 0.442, indicating large effect sizes ( η 2 p > 0.14).

This difference was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Figure 2 showed that BMI was not a prognosticator in post-menopausal patients [log-rank test, p = 0.148 ( Figure 2c )], but was a highly significant prognostic factor in pre-menopausal patients [log-rank test, p < 0.001 ( Figure 2b)] or in all patients [log-rank test, p < 0.001 ( Figure 2a )].

Results Analysis of phenotypic data Statistical analysis of plant architecture variables, obtained on the 266-pea-line collection at 8 and 14 days after sowing in Exp#1 and Exp#2, respectively, revealed highly significant G effects ( p-value < 0.001) for all the variables (Supplementary Table 1 ).

The χ 2-test value, for all tested traits, shows the difference in the variability between control and children with FS and this difference is highly significant (Σ X 2 cn/fs = 109.02; p <0.001), which shows that it is their genetic dispositions that differ.

The percentage of inflammation in the group (Carr) was increased progressively, and in a highly significant ( p < 0.001) way over time, it was increased from 65% at the first hour to 120% at the 6th hour.

Result: Combination of both Swetashankhapushpi and Clinical Yoga Techniques showed highly significant relief ( P <0.001) than single therapy, providing overall improvement in Generalized Anxiety Disorder.

The correlation analysis of various stress-related symptoms demonstrated a highly significant association (p < 0.001).

There was no main effect of prey size on pre-capture all-occurrence behaviors, but the comparison for behaviors surrounding consumption (post-capture all-occurrence behaviors and timed variables) was highly significant (MANOVA: Hotelling’s Trace = 2.3, F 24,82 = 3.9, p < 0.001).

Formal nested-model comparison confirmed this interpretation: adding ΔR(M–C) to a reduced model already containing Cobb_XR, TK_XR, and anthropometric covariates produced a highly significant improvement in model fit for FVC% (partial F = 103.0, p < 0.001; ΔAIC = −86.7), indicating substantial information gain rather than redundant variance.

The mean score of teamwork perceptions increased from T0 (91.02 ± 31.10) to T1 (145.27 ± 12.87) and T2 (142.30 ± 15.74), with highly significant values in repeated measures two-way ANOVA (f = 307.06, p < 0.001) and paired t-tests results (p1 < 0.001, and p2 < 0.001).

RESULTS Evaluation of benefits for retinal imaging Analysing the time needed to achieve correct positioning of the eye-to-camera angle and scanning area in OCT measurements of 11 independent mouse eyes, we observed a highly significant (p<0.001) time benefit when using the rodent holder ( figure 2 ).

These effects are usually highly significant (P < 0.001, see Figs 4 , 6 , 7 ).

There was a highly significant separation between the Bale monkeys and the combined vervet and grivet populations (Fig. 5a ; p < 0.001 ANOSIM), with the first NMDS dimension providing the main distinction.

Bartlett’s test of sphericity was 3.181425e-182, which is highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating that the variables were sufficiently correlated to justify the use of PCA.

While most of these relationships were non-significant ( S6 Fig ), there was a highly significant, positive relationship between parrotfish biomass and cover of live coral (r 2 = 0.25, p < 0.001; Fig 7 ).

The 50% excess over the expected number was highly significant (95% CI 1.3-1.7, P<0.001).

All dosage groups exhibited a highly significant suppression of MPO protein secretion ( p < 0.001), consistent with DAI and colon length measurements.

Relationships among leaf traits, root traits and RGR As expected, SRA and SRL showed highly significant negative correlations to root diameter across the sample ( p < 0.001, r = −0.52 and −0.70, respectively; Table 5 ).

Highly significant values ( p <0.001) are marked with an asterisk (*).

Assessing the effect direction of the identified neonatal mortality predictors using logistic regression The top three variables most relatively important in the XGBoost model were also highly significant in traditional logistic regression (early breastfeeding, birth weight, and household size, all with p-values <0.001).

The effect was highly significant in UACC-62, UACC-257, RPMI7951, and WM1366 cells ( p < 0.001), and significant in FB789 ( p < 0.01), confirming the specificity and efficacy of ASO-mediated silencing.

Both Wilk’s Λ and Pillai’s trace were highly significant ( p < 0.001) for each of the single IVs (treatment, exposure time and cultivar), for the two-way interactions (treatment ∗ exposure time, treatment ∗ cultivar, exposure time ∗ cultivar) and the three-way interaction treatment ∗ exposure time ∗ cultivar.