“highly significant”

A highly significant disparity was observed for plasma cell levels across groups ( p < 0.001).

The fertilization rate in all 125 cycles was 67.2% in the CT group and 53.5% in the non-CT group, with the difference being highly significant ( X 2 = 18.9, P < 0.001).

Moreover, a highly significant positive relationship between a family history of DM and a family history of thyroid disorders was affirmed (p < 0.001 and β = 0.461).

Statistical analysis revealed a highly significant difference between the HMGB-1 and control groups in the ratio of regenerated bone volume ( p < 0.001), while a significant difference was also detected between the HMGB-1 and rhBMP-2 groups ( p < 0.05) (Fig. 3 A).

The results showed that exposure of the organotypic cultures to Aβ1-42 peptide caused a highly significant increase in GFAP immunocontent ( P < 0.001; Figure 6A and B ).

A highly significant relationship between drug-induced mitochondrial toxicity and DILI occurrence in patients was calculated ( p < 0.001).

The results show that decorin protein core (henceforth designated decorin) was capable of retarding the growth of the breast carcinoma xenografts ( Figure 1A–D ), which was highly significant at day 23 ( Figure 1B, P <0.001).

The result is statistically significant when P ≤ 0.05 (α = 5.00%) and highly significant when P ≤ 0.001 (α = 0.10%).

On the basis of the additive model, the effect of normalized leaf position was highly significant, and normalized leaf area was well explained ( r 2 = 0.792, p <0.001) ( Fig. 3 ).

While m/z parameters showed moderate differences that didn’t reach statistical significance ( p = 0.082), intensity parameters demonstrated highly significant variations between groups ( p < 0.001), with notably lower Mean_Intensity values in cancer patients (Cohen’s d = 1.64).

Quantitative analysis confirmed a highly significant interaction between age and TZ size ( Fig. 2L ; ANOVA, F(4,18) = 298.03. p<0.001).

The decrease in viability was highly significant (p<0.001 by unifactorial ANOVA for all cell lines), Post-hoc testing reveals that the difference between solvent control and salinomycin treatment is significant for all concentrations >1 μM for all tested cell lines after 72 hrs; the difference is significant for 1 μM only in MDA-MB-453.

Statistical analyses showed that strain type had a highly significant impact on hydrophobicity ( p < 0.001), while left versus right contact angles did not significantly differ ( p > 0.05).

The difference in the inhibition effect between RAJI and THP-1 was statistically significant for the 25 μM treatment ( p < 0.01) and highly significant for the 50 μM and 100 μM treatments ( p < 0.001), as shown in Figure 4B .

Ecological functions in relation to plant diversity As shown in Figure 4 , among the taxonomic diversity, Margalef index had highly significant negative correlations with both NO 3 – –N and URE ( p <0.001) and significant positive correlations with NP ( p <0.05).

Regarding the color coordinates, the difference between the tested groups was highly significant in lightness (ΔL∗) ( p < 0.001), while no significant differences were found in green/red value (Δ a ∗) and yellow/blue value (Δ b ∗) ( p > 0.05).

Preoperative SEC (≥grade 3) was a highly significant predictor of postoperative sludge or severe SEC (p < 0.001), along with non-paroxysmal AF, cardiomyopathy, RAAI, and mean left atrial pressure ( Table 2 ). 3.4.

The bias towards the right hemisphere was strongest for area SP, and when tested statistically was highly significant (t(5) = 62.7;p < 0.001 This clear laterality effect is further considered in the ‘ Discussion ’.

1 ): the strain with the mutation for the methionine regulator MetR showed a highly significant, severe defect (CI = 0.028 ± 0.021; P < 0.001), while the strain with the mutation for a regulator of unknown function encoded by the locus VC1947 exhibited a less significant defect (CI = 0.719 ± 0.632; P < 0.05).

We found that all results using the K–S test are consistent with those using the t -test, and show highly significant differences in the δ parameters between age cohorts ( p < 0.001).

The indicators of cooperation all show highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 9 ) and large effects (up value d = 1.727) in the comparison of school gardening vs. classroom.

Each of the mean performance metrics was highly significant (empirical P = 0.001 for accuracy and precision, P = 0.028 for recall), indicating that the model's ability to differentiate patients from controls is substantially greater than chance.

The P value obtained was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

A highly significant correlation (R 2 = 0.78; p<0.001) was observed between these two estimates and we obtained the following simple linear regression: Chl-a probe = Chl-a spectro * 0.1445 + 2.9809.

We found that the slopes β 1 were highly significant for all traits (*** P < 0.001), except DM14 (* P < 0.05), and DM08, PY14, SG14, and ST14 ( P > 0.1) (see Supplementary Table S2 ).