“highly significant”

Heart Rate Linear mixed model analysis demonstrated a highly significant main effect of Timepoint on heart rate (F(3, 84) = 4973.270, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.994), indicating a substantial increase in HR during the TRAINING phase, followed by a return toward baseline values at POST 24 h ( Figure 6 ).

For relative conductivity, both G, W and their interaction were highly significant ( p < 0.001) ( Table 2 ).

The reason for not having surgery was excluded from the Cox model because this factor is partly derived from the stage of disease, and, as would be expected, the association between the two was highly significant ( χ 2 =37, P <<0.001).

The difference in powers used with the conventional and the Pascal lasers for these 22 patients was highly significant (p<0.001), being 396 mW for Pascal compared with 235 mW for conventional laser.

The frontal lobe's volumetric w-scores differed statistically highly significant between both dementia types for both the right and left frontal lobes (Welch's t-test, left frontal lobe: t = 8.94, df = 147.0, p < 0.001; right frontal lobe: t = 9.17, df = 150.1, p < 0.001).

At SUMC, the overall difference in time on top of the rotarod was highly significant as well ( p = 0.001).

The male and female models were both highly significant (Rs = 0.98, p < 0.001).

The number of spermatocytes was lowest in the Heat Control group, showing a highly significant reduction compared to Control at day 30 ( P < 0.001), while the Niacin 1 and Niacin 2 groups exhibited significantly increased spermatocyte counts relative to Heat Control at both time points ( P < 0.05 to P < 0.001), with Niacin 2 displaying the highest counts at day 30.

In contrast, the follow‐up data showed a highly significant between‐group difference ( p < 0.001), with only the combined and ECHT groups maintaining MCID benefits (76.7%, 60.0%, respectively). 3.2.3.

This difference was highly significant (p < 0.001), showing that knowledge strongly influences practice.

Correlation analysis The crude correlation among the two dietary instruments was highly significant for total fluid consumption in mL/d ( r = 0.73; p < 0.001).

Changes within each supplement group were analyzed by paired t -test using http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/Service/Statistics/Student_t_Test.html Group comparisons were done by unpaired t -test using http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/Service/Statistics/2Sample_Student_t_Test.html Results After 10 days of supplementation, both supplements produced highly significant increases in plasma lutein values (Fig. 1 , p < 0.001 for each treatment, paired t -test).

The overall ANOVA was highly significant (F(4) = 16.54, p < .001), indicating that the D1 was able to discriminate between therapeutic security profiles of mentally disordered offenders.

Molecular targets with highly significant ( p < 0.001) differences are given in the Supplements, Figure S2 .

Interestingly, the three patients with the highest mean APOBEC3A/B mutation rate stood out from this trend, and if data from these three patients were excluded, then the association between APOBEC3A/B and SBS89 mutation rates became highly significant ( p < 0.001). 3.3.

These differences were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Both main effects and their interaction were highly significant ( p < 0.001), jointly explaining 96.7% of the variance in mechanical force.

As a sensitivity check, a Monte Carlo chi-square test was also applied to the full table, confirming a highly significant association between subframes and channel type (Monte Carlo χ 2 35 =585.12; P <.001).

Whereas in the 250 mg/kg body weight of benzene extract treated animals showed a highly significant decrease (p≤0.001) in total sperm count (56%), total number of motile sperm (45%), forward velocity of sperm (49%) and a highly significant increase (p≤0.001) in the percentage of abnormal sperm (544%) when compared to control animals ( Table I ).

All the path coefficients were highly significant ( P < 0.001), indicating that all hypothesized relationships between constructs were supported.

The change was highly significant ( p = 0.001).

Regarding the Demoralization Scale (DS), the difference between the two groups was statistically highly significant (F=1.49; t=9.44; p<0.001, d=1.6).

However, after sleep, there was a strong and highly significant change in the time to peak of the PETH (i.e., “temporal coupling shift,” Fig 3B , Kolmogorov-Smirnoff p < 0.001) and a smaller but significant change in task-related modulation ( Fig 3C , p < 0.05, paired t test comparing modulation for Reach 2early to both Reach 1 blocks).

The Kruskal–Wallis test demonstrated highly significant variation in mean daily volumes of total calls, accepted calls, and ambulance dispatches (Table 4 ; all p < 0.001).

Influence of road, animal and weather on persistence time “All taxa ” The Cox model for the “all taxa ” data set (stratified by taxonomic group) was highly significant (P<0.001), and explained 9.9% of the variance in carcass persistence time.