“highly significant”

The 2-cluster solution was differently distributed over the 5 variables and according to the type of diagnoses (ICD-10; Table 1 ), and it was highly significant ( P< .001).

We apply a correction for multiple comparisons called False Discovery rate (FDR) to mitigate this effect, and we only retain highly significant p -values p < 0.001 from the corrected z-map.

This result was confirmed by the ML-HKA test [25] , for which a model allowing selection for PDS showed highly significant improvement to the likelihood compared with the neutral model (χ 2 = 19.62, df = 1, P <0.001).

Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test showed that this difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

We found a highly significant effect of clinical group [F (1,63) = 12.892, p <0.001] and a significant effect of age group [F (1,63) = 5.988, p = 0.017] with no interaction between clinical group and age group [F (1,63) = 0.133, NS], indicating a similar deficit in visual activation in both children and adults with NF1.

Furthermore, Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The results show highly significant group differences as well as high effect sizes (Cohen’s d) in all four indicator variables of acceptance ( Suitability ( t (58) = −3.64, p = 0.001, d = 0.94), Convenience (t (57) = −4.52, p < 0.001, d = 1.18), Ease of use (t (58) = −5.10, p < 0.001, d = 1.32), Preference (t (58) = −5.33, p = < 0.001, d = 1.38), as well as for Overall Acceptance (t (58) = −5.89, p < 0.001, d = 1.52).

Log-rank testing confirmed highly significant differences in survival distributions among trajectory groups ( P < 0.001 in both cohorts).

baumannii -infected mice treated with AMX (10 mg/kg) exhibited a 100% survival rate on day 30 post-infection ( Figure 8 C), which is highly significant as compared to the saline-treated mice ( p < 0.001).

A positive, statistically highly significant correlation was found between the BMCS barrier subscale and MLHFQ subscale and total scores (p<0.001; Table 5 ).

Despite a non-significant effect of treatment, the interaction between the Line × Treatment was highly significant ( F (1,178) = 20.96; p < 0.001), meaning that the effect of NLX administration on ethanol intake was more prominent in HA mice.

Differences were considered statistically significant with p < 0.05 (*), highly significant with p < 0.01 (**) and extremely significant with p < 0.001 (***). 2.8.

Experiment (1) revealed no negative impact by HEDP on available chlorine (1), while all three experiments showed a highly significant ( p > 0.001) synergistic effect, which was not hampered by HEDP, between NaOCl and ultrasonic activation regarding tissue weight loss (1, 3) and dissolution of gelatin (2).

There was a highly significant interaction between Task and Region for both sets of ROIs, P < 0.001.

These differences were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

At SUMC, the overall difference in time on top of the rotarod was highly significant as well ( p = 0.001).

The researchers considered the observed differences and associations according to the following: Not significant (NS) P greater than 0.05, Significant (S) P < 0.05*, Highly significant (HS) P < 0.001** 3 Results The descriptive analysis of the data is presented below.

When comparing MetS subjects to controls, the findings showed a highly significant difference between these groups regarding measurements of BMI ( p < 0.001), WC ( p < 0.001), fasting blood sugar (FBS) ( p < 0.001), Serum triglycerides TG ( p < 0.001), and WBS ( p < 0.006).

Results of the Mann-Kendall indicate that the warming trend is highly significant in all time series ( p < 0.001) (Table 4 ), except the MEF station data which was likely due to the shorter period of record (1961–present).

Enteromorpha intestinalis had the highest ash content (58.98% ± 1.75%), very highly significant (p < 0.001) than the other species except no significant difference with C. microphysa (57.21% ± 1.91%), while S. flavicans had the lowest (20.44% ± 0.74%).

control PDLs, where both TGFBR2 and TIEG showed highly significant correlation with TIMPs-1–3 and MMP-2 (correlation coefficients over 0.66, p < 10 − 3 , Supplementary Document 2 ).

Association between age group 30–44 years and moderate positive attitude and positive attitude was found to be highly significant ( p <0.001).

Greater consideration in our discussion was placed on highly significant terms (p < 0.001) due to the tendency of GAMMs to overfit, and p values > 0.001 should be treated as ambiguous as recommended in [ 45 ] and [ 55 ].

IL-18 levels among whites showed a highly significant correlation with HDL-C ( P < 0.001), LDL cholesterol (LDL-C; P < 0.001), and TGs ( P < 0.001) and moderate correlation with oxidized LDL ( P = 0.04), but no correlation with nonesterified fatty acids ( P = 0.7).

When tested separately, the contra-ipsilateral difference in the detection task was marginally significant, F 1,33 = 3.95, P = 0.055, η p 2 = 0.11, while in the discrimination task, it was highly significant, F 1,33 = 20.29, P < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.38.