Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP < 0,0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Statistical evaluation of raw data before and after training in preparations (mV for Pa2/3 and frequency in % for other neurons) showed that changes in responsiveness in serotonergic #4 pedal neurons and premotor withdrawal interneurons #2/3 after training were highly significant (Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test, P < 0,001), while changes in the metacerebral neuron (MtC1) involved in feeding behavior were non-significant.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Before interventions, the experimental group presents higher stiffness (0.49 ± 0.09, 0.60 ± 0.08, 0.96 ± 0.08 Nm/°) under different dorsiflexion angle level (0°, 10°, and 20°) than the control group pre-interventions (0.24 ± 0.06, 0.42 ± 0.09, 0.57 ± 0.09 Nm/°) due to ankle spasticity, and the differences are highly significant ( p < 0.001, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Statistical versus practical significance: As noted in Table 2 , the p-values for pre- and post-event comparisons of all subgroups, as well as the overall population, were highly significant (p < 0.001), which may reflect large sample sizes and/or meaningful shifts [ 50 ].
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A significantly higher proportion (112; 88%) belonged to laborer categories (skilled/unskilled/Agriculture labor) when compared to other occupations (small or large business, private or government services) [16; 12%] with this difference is statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Behavioral data analysis Behavioral analyses demonstrated systematic variations across occlusion levels, with repeated-measures ANOVAs (Greenhouse-Geisser corrected) revealing highly significant main effects on all measured parameters: NASA-TLX scores (F(2,128) = 38.40, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.375), recognition accuracy (F(2,128) = 616.95, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.906), and reaction time (F(2,128) = 244.43, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.792) (Fig. 8 ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This was reflected in a highly significant three-way interaction of stimulation, patient, and effector ( F(4,123) = 9.547, p < 0.001), with post hoc t tests confirming in LW a vocal (p = 0.030), but not manual, effect (p = 1.000), and in DH a manual (p < 0.001), but not vocal, effect (p = 0.098, all Bonferroni adjusted).
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
To evaluate whether transcriptional signatures based on differential expression analysis could segregate subjects from distinct states of infection, we applied an unsupervised hierarchical clustering on expression data from highly significant DEGs between all groups (ANOVA P < 0.001, 2232 genes), shown in Fig 1C .
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The naphtoquinone significantly ( p < 0.05) diminished the protozoan proliferation at 20 μM and the inhibition was highly significant ( p < 0.001) at 30–50 μM, producing 19 μM IC 50 . 3.2 Cytotoxicity In order to test its possible selectivity, the compound was assayed on mammalian cells.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
It was found that: (a) LHIP/RHIP connections that were significant in the best 5-source model remain the same in 6-source model (except one RIPC to RHIP connection that fell slightly below the significance threshold), (b) connections from LHIP to mPFC, LIPC and RIPC are significantly ( p < 0.01) stronger than the same connections from RHIP, (c) there is a very strong (0.44 Hz) and highly significant ( p < 0.001) connection from LHIP to RHIP and no connection in the opposite direction.
highly significantp value < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
No major changes in vital signs and weight were noted across the three arms throughout the 6-month treatment period. Secondary outcomes The increases in the percentage of CD4 + FoxP3 + CD25 high Treg from the baseline levels were highly significant ( p value < 0.001) across all the six timepoints (D8, D36, D64, D92, D120, D148) throughout the treatment phase in both the IL-2 q2wk and IL-2 q4wk arms, compared to the placebo arm.