Significance thresholds were established at ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, and highly significant differences at ∗∗∗P < 0.001.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Similarly, the rainfall-driven resilience of Fogera cows, reflecting changes in individual performance for average daily milk yield, productive longevity, functional longevity, and heat tolerance index, showed negative effects, ranging from − 4.4 × 10−12 to −1.34 × 10−10, with all resilience phenotypes being highly significant (P < 0.001).
Statistical analysis revealed a highly significant difference between the groups, as demonstrated by a Chi-square value of 26.457 and a P = 0.001 [ Table 1 ].
Two-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of age on PERG amplitude ( P < 0.001), but no significant effect of treatment group ( P = 0.561) or interaction between age and treatment group ( P = 0.990).
All population differentiation statistics were highly significant ( P < 0.001) for both rivers.
Both p_Med and p_NoMed showed highly significant effects of coat color (p < 0.001), sex (p < 10−19), and body region (p < 10−11).
On 42 d, the incorporation of XLE in the diet induced a highly significant increase in the serum CAT ( P < 0.001) and T-AOC ( P = 0.003) levels, along with a highly significant decrease in the MDA content in broilers ( P < 0.001). 3.6 Effects of XLE supplementation on the liver antioxidant capacity and immunoglobulin levels in broilers As shown in Table 10 , the addition of XLE to the diets significantly increased the contents of superoxide dismutase (SOD; P < 0.001) and the contents of T-AOC ( P < 0.001) in broiler livers, while also decreasing MDA content compared to the control group ( P = 0.035).
The total score from the Tromsø SI measure across pre-post measurement, for example, showed a highly significant between-group difference favoring those high on EQ (F = 23.05, p < .001; partial eta 2 = .07).
The results confirmed the robustness of our findings: liver enzyme reductions (ALT, AST, and GGT) and fasting blood sugar remained highly significant (all p < 0.001), while nonsignificant outcomes such as NFS and platelet counts remained unchanged.
In agreement with the results obtained in our cell line models, MIG-6 expression showed a highly significant increase in PTC samples harboring the BRAF V600E mutation as compared to the cases with BRAF WT (P < 0.001; Fig 5A ).
The differences in disease-free survival (DFS) and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) were highly significant (DFS: p < 0.001; MSS: p < 0.001; Figure 5B ).
There was a statistically highly significant relationship between birth cohort and change in BMI (p<0.001).
One-way ANOVA (SES group) calculated at the end of each school year showed a highly significant SES effect from grade I to grade III ( p < 0.001), a moderate significant effect ( p = 0.016) at grade IV, and no effect at grade V ( p = 0.245).
There was a highly significant effect of floor pattern orientation on the extent of veering, F(6.8,139.9) = 21.733, p<.001, partial η 2 = .486, observed power = 1.00.
There was a highly significant positive correlation between class 1 integron prevalence and numbers of 3GC-resistant coliforms (Pearson's coefficient 0.8415; P <0.001).
However, when the tests were done using plates with triclosan in concentrations of 1000 μg/ml a highly significant decrease in zone-diameter was seen towards SXT (p < 0.001) and ENR (p < 0.001) for both T4/74C and TDTU3C (Table 4 ).
The difference between the two types of devices was highly significant (P < 0.001), with a catch index of 3.61 for the target on pirogue.
In the genu valgum group, the MAR improved from 0.753 (range 0.35-1.67) to 0.14 (range 0.01-0.33), while in the genu varum group it changed from 1.02 (range 0.7-1.45) to 0.211 (range 0.05-0.72) both of which were highly significant with P < 0.001 [Tables 2 and 3 ].
There was a highly significant reduction in clinicians citing they had ‘inadequate knowledge’ to provide counselling (from 43% before GA to 11% of the cohort after GA, p < 0.001), although this remained the most commonly cited explanation of why counselling was not provided or was limited (for 17 sets of parents).
However, residual heterogeneity remained (τ 2 = 0·280, I 2 = 90·3%), with the test for residual heterogeneity being highly significant (QE = 167·68, df = 23, p < 0·001).
It is important to mention that highly significant differences were found ( p <0.001) when comparing the average annual frequencies of the three histological types for each biological behavior.
3 Results When comparing the demographic variables between the groups, the mean age was the oldest in the P + CAD group (51.57 ± 5.19 years), showing a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).
As expected, the AR1 diagonal was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The DeLong test indicated a highly significant difference in AUC between the 8-item GDCS (AUC = 0.936) and the BRASS (AUC = 0.518), with a Z-score of 11.929 and a p -value < 0.001, which demonstrated the substantially better performance of the 8-item GDCS.
The mean haemoglobin level and haematocrit, immediately after surgery, showed a highly significant decrease ( P < 0.001) from the baseline value.