“highly significant”

However, school fees were not included as bivariate analysis consistently showed a highly significant relationship between school fees and the subgroup of children labelled with dyslexia (p<0.001 in every sweep); yet the numbers of cohort members in the school fees cells were very small ( Table 2 ).

The results were considered significant when p (degree of significance) is less than 0.05, very significant when p < 0.01, and highly significant when p < 0.001.

Consistent with this interpretation, the Shapiro-Wilk values for all items at all time points were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Effect of Strain on Hatchability Genetic strain had a highly significant effect on hatchability ( P < 0.001).

This is also a highly significant relationship ( p < 0.001).

We observed a highly significant reduction of evoked EPSCs in burst firing neurons (to 45±6% of baseline levels, p<0.001; control: 374±21 pA vs.

This difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

A comparison between the ASERT subscores and the relevant clinical scales, using an LME model, showed a highly significant association both for the sum of the depression-oriented questions (Q1-Q4) versus the sum of the coincident MADRS scale ( P <.001) and also for the sum of the mania-oriented questions (Q5-Q8) versus the sum of the coincident YMRS scale ( P <.001).

Collectively, the correlation between cytology and histology was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Despite the variability, Bacteria-to-Archaea gene copy ratios follow a highly significant, exponential relationship with temperature ( R 2 = 0.67, p < 0.001 (two-sided Spearman correlation coefficient); Supplementary Fig. 8 ).

Highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) were found in five categories: general COVID-19 information level (37.3% vs. 26.2%), concerns (24.1% vs. 12.2%), isolation (21.4% vs. 13.7%), uncertainty (21.2% vs. 8.5%), and prioritization (15.2% vs. 23.4%).

These decreases were statistically highly significant as determined by One-way ANOVA analysis (P < 0.001).

Using a paired t -test, the difference between starting and ending dosage was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

SNP rs160087383 at CD14 had a highly significant effect on the milk yield ( p < 0.001) and coagulation, and CC homozygous ewes showed both higher daily yields and better coagulation traits than TT, i.e., faster rennet coagulation times and larger curd firmness ( p < 0.05): dMY 2012 vs. 1654 g/day, RCT 7.60 vs. 9.28 min, and a 30 52.52 vs. 48.03 mm, respectively.

For total active behaviors summed across the 12 time points, the effect of treatment was highly significant ( p < 0.001, Figure 3 b).

The overall effect between the groups in the chemical composition (crude protein, intramuscular fat) in the breast and leg muscles was shown to be highly significant ( p < 0.001).

There was a highly significant mucosal enhancement ( P <0.001) and significant bowel wall dilatation in patients with NE when compared with the second group ( P =0.002).

The main effect of the year was highly significant (F(1, 31) = 222.8, P < 0.001), while the main effect of sex alone was not significant (F(1, 31) = 3.34, P = 0.077).

Results Development of insects reared in laboratory The linear mixed-effects model applied to the morphometric data confirmed a highly significant effect of the developmental stage ( F = 4323.5, p < 0.001) and the interaction between stage and generation ( F = 1.6, p < 0.001) on insect weight, with similar significant results for all other morphometric variables (length, width, and area).

The difference was highly significant (p<0.001)( Table 3 ).

There was a highly significant and positive correlation between dose and baseline K-ARS scores (r=0.275, p=0.001) and also a positive correlation between dose and endpoint K-ARS scores (r=0.365, p=0.001).

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin sampling adequacy measure was 0.80 and Bartlett’s sphericity test was highly significant ( P<0 . 001 ).

Correlation of all three histological grades with the Glucksberg stage of intestinal GvHD was highly significant in terms of the maximum, median, mean, and even minimum of all three grading system scores (each p ≤ 0.001) ( S1 – S3 Figs).

Those patients who had past history of diabetes were 5 times at risk of developing MetS as compared to others when adjusted for other variables in the model (AOR: 5.3; 95% CI: 1.0–74) and was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

We pooled the absolute errors from both computations and applied matched pairs t-test and Wilcoxon signed rank test, which were highly significant with p = 0.001 and p = 0.003 for the two-tailed test, respectively.