“highly significant”

For the cleavage rate (D3), a significant drop was observed for follicles with a volume > 800 μL ( p = 0.039), which became highly significant at >1200 μL ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 2 A).

The results revealed highly significant positive correlations ( p < 0.001) between TP content and all three antioxidant assays ( Figure 9 ).

The Young’s modulus values were less dispersed in late-mature enamel ( Figure 4E ) than in early maturation ( Figure 4D ), with a highly significant difference for more mineralized late-mature enamel ( p < 0.001 ) of DEHP-treated mice.

Nevertheless, the interaction context X phases presents highly significant differences (F (4, 88) = 11.361, p < 0.001).

Correlation analysis between ANGPTLs and atherogenic lipid biomarkers performed in the whole study group indicated a highly significant positive association of ANGPTL3 and ANGPTL8 with TG (R = 0.375 and R = 0.528; p < 0.001), TG/HDL-C (R = 0.33; p = 0.001 and R = 0.52; p < 0.001), sdLDL-C (R = 0.29; p = 0.004 and R = 0.38; p < 0.001), and remnant-C levels (R = 0.25; p = 0.015 and R = 0.36; p < 0.001).

The extended method using single cusp scoring (EM-S and EM(R)-S) had higher intra-species resolution, with highly significant differences in both cusp and tooth positions between D. bicornis, R. unicornis and C. simum (LME: p <0.001) ( Table 2 ).

These correlations were highly significant (p < 0.001 in two-sided Spearman rank correlation test).

These observations were also substantiated by a highly significant ( p <0.001) interactive effect between the variables on biomass production.

The results revealed that the linear effect of time was highly significant for both the receptive (F = 89.484, p < 0.001, partial eta squared = 0.519) and productive (F = 36.368, p < 0.001, partial eta squared = 0.305) aspects.

As shown in Figure 5 , biofilms of 18 out of the 21 isolates suffered a significant biomass reduction with 10 isolates having a very highly significant biomass reduction ( p < 0.001).

The heterogeneity accounting for the differences in effect sizes among the studies included in the meta-analysis was large and highly significant (Q (51) = 179.742, p < 0.001).

This study showed a highly significant ( p < 0.001) association of PRO and an increased risk of muscle loss [ 5 ].

Highly significant ( p < 0.001) differences mainly in the percentage of actinomycetes, the conductivity, and the granulometry parameters (fine silt, large silt, fine sand, large sand, and clay) were observed ( Table S1 ).

In the present work, the level of serum HDL-c showed a positive, highly significant correlation with interstitial testicular tissue area (r=0.73; p<0.001) and STs area (r=0.61; p<0.01).

All correlations were highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Leaf area [ cm 2 ] : The interactions of Azolla and nitrogen fertilizer on leaf area were highly significant ( P ≤ 0.001) ( Table 1 S).

The 12 week EWL was highly significant (p < .001).

The difference between the groups was statistically highly significant (p <0.001).

There was a highly significant difference in concentration of clopidogrel carboxylic acid between the measurement time points in sheep ( p ≤ 0.001) and in lambs ( p = 0.005).

There was no association between prognostic factors such as patient age, tumour size, PASS score, extra-adrenal location or genetic mutations, and tumour recurrence in this study; however, two of the three node-positive patients had recurrence, and this was highly significant at P < 0.001.

The differences in the mean number of SCEs per cell between the control and all test variants (solution, dose, and time) were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Dance activities before the accident happened Highly significant gender differences (p<0.001) (Figure 2 ) were observed with movement contents where explicitly named jumps ( allegro , grand allegro, cabriole, grand jeté ) resulted in the most frequent traumatic injuries in males (sprains, pulled muscles).

A highly significant ( P < 0.001) effect was observed between the groups.

Similarly, the perceived adequacy of the training was highly significant ( p < 0.001): 7.8% of those who considered it adequate reported high scores, compared to 33.3% of those who judged it “not entirely adequate”.

Again, the highly significant ability of inhibiting the formation of new blood vessels by S. triloba were obvious ( P = 0.001), the finding that enforced the in vitro observation and voted for the high potential of S. triloba as inhibitor of many crucial steps of the angiogenesis process.