“highly significant”

Regarding our main conclusion (i) that colour lightness is consistently correlated to the thermal environment, we found that all 24,000 regressions were highly significant ( t -test, P <0.001) with positive slopes throughout the models, indicating that different evolutionary models do not alter the positive relationship between colour lightness and the thermal environment ( Supplementary Fig. 7 ).

The ANOVA of the quadratic regression model (Table 2 ) demonstrated that Eq. ( 1 ) is a highly significant model ( P = 0.001).

Associations around balance and body pain were highly significant between fallers and non‐fallers (OR = 4.45, 95% CI [2.10, 9.40], z = 3.91, p = 0.001 and OR = 3.51, 95% CI [1.88, 6.55], z = 3.94, p = 0.001, respectively).

TG showed a significant negative correlation with HDL-C (P < 0.01), while a highly significant positive correlation was observed with VLDL-C (P < 0.001).

The difference in the mean time of rescue analgesia was statistically highly significant when Group A (gabapentin) was compared with Group C (placebo) (P value<0.001) and when Group B (pregabalin) was compared with Group C (placebo) (P value<0.001).

The difference between mFPR1 -/- mice and WT-mice was highly significant either among the CD11b + - (153±32 vs 102±24 (p<0,001)) and the Ly6G + -cells (WT126±21 vs mFPR1 -/ 85±22 (p<0,001)).

The authors reported that regression of body height, body length and heart girth had highly significant ( P < 0.001) effects on body weight.

Mean SAS-SV scores differed substantially between these two stratified groups and the comparison was highly significant (t (262) = -19.97, p < .001).

The association between OFP and OHRQoL was strong and highly significant in all models ( P < .001).

The results were highly significant in both Helse Nord (p < 0.001) and Helse Midt (p = 0.004).

Comparison between sites using paired t-test and linear regression demonstrate a highly significant (f = 9.99; df = 44; P<0.001) difference between the Philippines site and the other four non-fished sites (vs.

The model assessing the effect of vegetation structure (three categories) was also highly significant ( χ 2 = 198.95, df = 2, p < 0.001), harvested fields being preferred as foraging locations over both vegetated and ploughed crops, whereas no differences in selection occurred between ploughed and vegetated fields ( Table 1 ).

This difference was highly significant in a simple two-group comparison ( p -value < 0.001).

The quadratic models ( Table S4 ), containing only significant terms (p < 0.05), were highly significant (p < 0.001) and accurate (p-values of lack-of-fit > 0.05) for all variable responses.

Significance level was set at p < 0.05, highly significant p < 0.001 and non-significant p > 0.05.

The univariate analysis revealed that the HLA-A*01 allele was associated to the low PDA group with a very highly significant p = 0.001 ( Table 1 ), respectively, significant for A*30 ( p = 0.048).

Importantly, all p-values were found to be highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Performance in cognitive tests All four cognitive domains had highly significant intercorrelations (P<0.001 each) as shown in Supplementary Table S1 .

The p < 0.05 level was assumed as a statistically significant relationship (*); p < 0.01 is a highly significant relationship (**); p < 0.001 is a very highly statistically significant relationship (***).

The shade matching scores were highly significant with the light-correcting device as compared with natural light 11.4 ± 1.9 and 10.4 ± 2.0, respectively ( p < 0.001), while gender and experience were not found to be the factors affecting shade matching [ 26 ].

Both the differential COVID-19-year effect and age trends are highly significant for both sexes ( p -value < 0.001).

As result, the test was highly significant for both the 10S pattern, χ 2 (24) = 185, p < 0.001, and the 10M pattern, χ 2 (24) = 145, p < 0.001, indicating that they were probably not produced by a homogeneous Poisson process.

The genes displayed diverse expression patterns, with 20 genes demonstrating highly significant differential expression ( P < 0.001).

Results The differences in the total physical activity Mets for the patients with schizophrenia were highly significant (p = 0.001), showing a lower degree of physical activity compared to the control group.

Incident reports that GRMs rated as error containing were plotted against the group error scores for these 119 organisational units, and the correlation coefficient of 0.66 was highly significant (95% CI 0.54 to 0.75, p<0.001)( figure 4 A).