Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the cases screened within three days of febrile illness was a highly significant predictor of LDMI [(aOR = 5.17 (95% CI 3.47–7.70; p < 0.001)], with the controlled effect of all other independent factors such as endemicity, season, and age (Table 5 ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The statistical significance between samples was evaluated by performing Student’s t -test, with p -values less than 0.05 regarded as statistically significant, p < 0.01 indicated highly significant difference, p < 0.001 indicated extremely significant difference. 3.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Degrees of significance were assessed using different rating values: * p < 0.05 (significant), ** p < 0.01 (highly significant), *** p < 0.001 (extremely significant), **** p ≤ 0.0001 (extremely significant), and non-significant ( p > 0.05). 5.
highly significantp<0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Animal trials It was found that there were very highly significant (p<0.001) differences between diet treatments for all the measured parameters (total DMI, LWG and gain:feed, in vivo viscosity, ME:GE, AME content, ME:Gain, DM retention, ileal dry matter, starch and protein digestibility).
highly significantP <0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Contrary to expectations, two-way ANOVA analysis of the skeletal phenotype at 6, 12, and 18 wk of age ( Figure 1b , Table 1 , Figure 1—figure supplement 1c , Supplementary file 1 ), revealed highly significant ( P <0.001) anabolic effects of Rspo3 haplo-insufficiency on structural, cellular, and dynamic parameters in both female and male mice.
highly significantp<0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Correlation analysis of MMP-9/BDNF ratio with parameters of interest for the clinical assessment of the disease severity ( Table 4 ) revealed its negative correlation with IL-10/IL-17 ratio in moderately ill patients (p<0.05) and highly significant positive correlation with MMP-8 in mild (I), moderate (II) and IV (critical) groups (p<0.001).