Highly significant community level differences were observed between Fraction (PERMANOVA p-value < 0.001), Collection (PERMANOVA p-value < 0.001) and feed (PERMANOVA p-value < 0.001) based on the Bray–Curtis distances while less significant changes were contributed by breed (PERMANOVA p-value = 0.037) (Table 1 ).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Monthly testing of febrile cases increased from a health facility mean of 31.2% to 76.3% following implementation across the three intervention districts, a highly significant improvement compared with the control district, where mean monthly facility testing rates declined from 50.8% to 41.8% (Z = 4.71, p < 0.001, adjusting for all facility-level covariates).
The mean TAS was significantly lower in OC users (0.79 ± 0.19 mmol Trolox equivalent/L) compared to non-users (1.17 ± 0.18 mmol Trolox equivalent/L), with a highly significant difference (z = 9.451; p < 0.001).
Results The mean AOFAS score at follow-up was 78.4 ± 21.8, and the modified Cincinnati rating was 6.6 ± 2.6; the improvement from the preoperative values was highly significant in both scores ( P < 0.001 in the paired, 2-sided t test).
The difference between the observed pattern among the firefighters and that expected for the community based on over 19,000 cases from 19 studies [ 45 ] was also highly significant (p < 0.001) (Figure 2 ).
Post-hoc contrasts comparing QoM averages between conditions revealed a highly significant effect ( t(69.8 )=4.86, p <0.001; see top left panel of Figure 5 for QoM averaged across PMs).
Similarly, for serum MTL ( Figure 3C ), the NMs level was profoundly lower than that of the NC ( p < 0.001), and the HF demonstrated a highly significant increase compared to the NM ( p < 0.001).
Genetic variation revealed among 5 group was statistically highly significant at 1 % (P < 0.001).
Among controls, associations between NGAL and other serum markers were attenuated for sTNFR-1, and sTNFR-2, although being highly significant (p < 0.001).
The last model had a log-likelihood of -496.43 against the null log-likelihood of -631.86, and the likelihood ratio test showed that the model was highly significant more than the null( p < 0.001). 4.
The data in Table 1 show highly significant differences about (“Age (years)” and “Exercise (years)”) ( p = 0.001) between prescribers and non-prescribers.
Other predictors (covariates or control variables) in the models The predictors birthdate, breed and growth phase were highly significant (P value<0.001) in our regression models for all five outcomes).
The final regression model was highly significant ( p < 0.001), with a correlation coefficient of 0.609.
We observed a highly significant difference in percent survival between these two genotypes (P<0.001).
Data was considered statistically significant if the p value is < to 0.05 and highly significant at p < 0.001.
This model remained highly significant, F (2, 163) = 32.296, p < 0.001, accounting for 28.4% of variance in PPD symptoms ( R 2 = 0.284, Adjusted R 2 = 0.275).
Furthermore, the model’s structural stability was confirmed by CV-ANOVA diagnostics, which revealed a highly significant distribution ( p < 0.001), establishing the definitive validity of the chemometric classification.
This difference was highly significant (T = 6.847, df = 108, p < .001).
While all factors contributed highly significant to the structure of the data ( P < 0.001), the denominator ‘site’ was the most pronounced factor as indicated by the highest Pseudo-F value (Pseudo-F = 10.40).
There was a highly significant difference in the BSFS score between T0 and T4 ( β = 2.07 ± 0.20, t188 = 10.46, p < 0.001; Figure 2 ) and between T0 and T5 ( β = 1.69 ± 0.20, t188 = 8.575, p < 0.001; Figure 2 ).
Finally, the three-way interaction (R/P) × pH × MFR turns were found to have a highly significant impact on the average particle diameter ( p = 0.001), unlike the second-order interactions involving the number of turns ( p > 0.05). 3.4.3.
The estimate for sertraline was highly significant ( p < 0.001), meaning the null hypothesis can be rejected on the basis of the theoretical model.
In contrast, analysis of US specimens yielded a highly significant result ( r statistic = 0.515, p = 0.001).
Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05, and highly significant results were reported as p < 0.001.
Overall, there was a highly significant linear trend from 7 to 11, p < .001.