“highly significant”

Reduction of seizures of those patients as calculated from seizure diary was still highly significant ( p = 0.001).

Each axis, PC1 and PC2, explained 38.4% and 25.4% of the total variation and both axis returned highly significant P values ( P < 0.001).

The group effect in IgG decline was found to be highly significant ( χ 2 (2) = 22·258, p < 0·001).

The analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) resulted in highly significant effects ( p = 0.001) of the clusters on the molecular variance observed in the GBS SNP dataset ( Table 2 ).

Both traits showed highly significant differences among root positions ( p < 0.001; Fig. 5A–B , Table 1 ).

Hence, adopting the total oocyte number from PVO4b to VTO as our proxy for potential fecundity, the relationship with body size (TL) was positive and highly significant (GLM, P < 0.001; Fig. 5A ), while no differences among spawning seasons was observed (GLM, P = 0.76).

The statistical trend analysis revealed a highly significant increase ( p < 0.001) in both biomarkers ( Table 5 ).

In vitro Killing Kinetics of MDR-EAEC With Indolicidin In groups I, II, and V, the antimicrobial effect of Indolicidin was highly significant ( P < 0.001) at 120 min of co-incubation ( Figure 1 ).

Potential risk factors for calves’ ringworm As revealed in Table 1 , there was a highly significant ( P < 0.001) association between ringworm infection and the investigated risk factors.

When expressed as percent safety of the household (excluding irrelevant items) there was a highly significant improvement (Mean ± SD 71.9% ± 9.5% vs. 87.1% ± 8.6%; t = -16.27, p < 0.001).

A consistent drop in performance in the UKCAT scores occurred with each fall in A level band, and this was highly significant in all cases (P<0.001, Kruskal-Wallis test).

Analyzing the data looking for the prevalence among these patients, the correlation test revealed a highly significant correlation between gingival bleeding index and age, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.361 ( p <0.001).

With men and women combined the decrease in femoral artery blood flow was highly significant (p < 0.001).

For the observers’ freezing, a 6 epoch (baseline, shock 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) × 2 preexposure (preexposed versus nonpreexposed) ANOVA on observer freezing revealed highly significant main effects for epoch (F [3.406,54.497] = 21.682, p < 0.001), preexposure (F [1,16] = 35.97, p < 0.001), and epoch × preexposure interaction (F [3.406,54.497] = 5.804, p = 0.001).

Further evidence for consistent ranking of the apps’ performance across the different subclasses was the highly significant Kendall’s coefficient of concordance ( W = 0.88, P < 0.001).

In a linear model with “Sex”, “Julian date”, and “Year” (continuous variable), the year parameter estimate was highly significant (t = −7.6, p < 0.001), representing 13.8% reduction of the calf body mass during 1992–2018.

Furthermore, the box plot showed a highly significant difference in the mean expression levels of RBMS3 between NPC tumors and non-tumor samples (p<0.001; Fig. 1B ).

Spearman’s rank correlation analysis yielded a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.001) between all three cognitive scoring systems (MMSE, MoCA, and CCS).

Also, a highly significant association was observed between SPF and ploidy (p<0.001), as 23% of the tumors with SPF, less than 7.5% were aneuploid, compared to 74% of the tumors with higher proliferation rates [ 30 ].

The association was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) with a medium effect size (from 0.51 to 0.73) were observed for the following parameters: sTfR, CHr, LowCHr, MCVr, MCH, MCV, CH, LowCHm, and MICROm.

65 Similarly, compared to the healthy controls, a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.001) was noted between the salivary glucose and serum glucose levels in diabetic patients. 66 Despite no significant changes in serum phosphate levels between healthy adult controls (52.3 ± 8 years) and diabetic patients (48.3 ± 7 years), the salivary phosphate level was significantly ( p < 0.01) higher in diabetic patients ( n = 60; 13.7 ± 4.4 mg/dl) as compared to the healthy controls ( n = 60; 8.3 ± 1.9 mg/dl). 66 This shows a trend of elevation of salivary phosphate levels, even before apparent changes in serum level of phosphate in metabolic diseases.

The inability to undertake a baseline power analysis decreases the evaluation of type 1 and type 2 statistical errors, but the relatively large numbers of subjects and also the very highly significant values found (p < 0.001) would make the chance of such errors very small.

However, SH showed significant differences between genotypes ( p < 0.01 and p < 0.001 in 2018 and 2019, respectively) and highly significant differences between WM ( p < 0.001; for both seasons).

The statistical analysis using the Mann–Whitney U test confirmed that these differences are highly significant (U = 225, p < 0.001).