“highly significant”

The mean dose comparison between IMRT with HT and VMAT with HT was highly significant (P = 0.001).

This reduction in IL-1β levels at 1 week, when compared with baseline was statistically significant ( P < 0.05) in the control group, whereas it was highly significant ( P < 0.001) in the test group [ Figure 3 ]. hBD-2 levels (pg/site) at baseline and at the end of 1 week and 4 weeks in the control group were 69.76 ± 10.2, 64.5 ± 18.93 and 66.5 ± 13.09 and were 70.03 ± 12.6, 67.15 ± 12.9 and 69.76 ± 15.89 in the test group, respectively.

Candidiasis, erosive lichen planus and herpes zoster infection were more in patients who were above 40 years of age, whereas herpes labialis, aphthous stomatitis and oral mucositis were more common among patients who were less than 40 years of age (x 2 = 52.129; df = 7; P < 0.001; Highly significant) [ Table 1 , Figure 1 ].

The variation between caries-free and caries group pertaining to tasters and nontasters was found to be statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001) and without any gender variation (data not shown).

The mean scores were not statistically significant between the sexes ( P =0.348), but highly significant differences were observed in year of study ( P =0.001) ( Tables 2 and 3 ).

The residential area showed a highly significant difference ( p value < 0.001), with the Eastern region reporting the highest levels of satisfaction.

The comparison of total scores, D and correct responses was found to be very highly significant with P < 0.001, whereas the comparison of S ( P = 0.202) and O ( P = 0.079) was considered insignificant.

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (release 23.0) with a significance threshold set at p < 0.05 and a highly significant threshold at p < 0.001.

The test confirmed a highly significant difference among groups (F = 5741.35, P < 0.001, Partial eta squared [η P 2 ] = 0.997; Table 4 ).

RESULTS: Upper first molar distalization (U6–VRL) (distance from mesiobuccal cusp of upper first molar to vertical reference line from S point; measures distal movement.) showed a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001, d = 5.96 – very large), with the MLE achieving almost double the distal movement of CMA (−7.65 ± 0.74 mm for MLE Group, −3.03 ± 1.84 for CMA).

In the fungal community, both indices of the Tb groups exhibited lower values than those of the CK groups, particularly in the Shannon index, which displayed highly significant differences across all regions ( p < 0.001).

The test yielded a highly significant P value ( P =0.001), indicating notable differences in the distribution of discussions on stigma, race/ethnicity, and inequities across counties.

The pre-test yielded a median score of 9 (IQR: 6.7, 11), with a highly significant Z -value of −8.245 ( P < 0.001) when compared to Post-Test 1, which had a median score of 24 (IQR: 21, 25), demonstrating substantial gains in knowledge.

According to the stroke risk screening tool, 4 (10.53%) patients were classified as having low risk, 14 (36.84%) patients were classified as having cautious risk, and 20 (52.63%) patients were classified as having high risk, with statistically highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) than their matched controls.

A value of p < .05 was considered statistically significant, p < .01 was considered highly significant and p < .001 was considered extremely statistically significant. 3.

The minimal model for fur and skin, which included age categories 1–3 as a factor, explained 42.74% ( p < 0.001) and 22.23% ( p < 0.05) of data variability, respectively, with a highly significant difference found between age groups 1 and 3 ( p < 0.001) and no difference between groups 1 and 2 (Fig. 2a, b ).

For all the four variables, a highly significant trend was apparent to a progressive increase with age (p<0.001) and more so in the transition from the peri-pubertal age to adolescence.

As depicted in Table 1 , rats treated with a single injection of MTX demonstrated a highly significant increase (p < 0.001) in the serum levels of AST, ALT, and ALP enzymes in comparison to control and crocin-treated groups.

The overall F ST value across 11 loci was 0.111 and was highly significant (P<0.001).

When compared to the control group, it was highly significant (P < 0.001).

Lastly, positive versus negative control showed a highly significant difference ( P < .001) (Table 3 ).

This difference was highly significant (Chi-square, P < .001).

Critical for our hypothesis, the two-way interaction between Valency and N − 1 Valency was also highly significant, F (1, 25,267) = 42.1, p < .001.

As shown in Table 3 , the Pearson correlation coefficient indicated a positive and highly significant correlation between the total UWES-9S and subscale scores (p < 0.001).

This test showed a highly significant main effect of method for both image collections ( p < 0.001).