“highly significant”

observed a highly significant increase in the incidence of anemia ( P <0.001) in pregnant teenagers, 11.1% as compared with 5.2% in the 20-24 year old age group.( 21 ) In this study, the finding was similar, though the incidence, as a whole, was higher in both the groups than that observed by Osbourne.( 21 ) Other authors, howe

Blood pressure reductions 48 hours postdose were 25.6/16.4 mmHg for candesartan/HCTZ and 9.2/4.2 mmHg for losartan/HCTZ, with differences between treatments being highly significant in favor of candesartan/HCTZ (16.5/12.2 mmHg; P < 0.001).

Significant differences are indicated using the standard Michelin Guide scale ( P < 0.05, significant; P < 0.01, highly significant; P < 0.001, extremely significant).

For all six groups, when multimorbid pairs were compared with their respective index condition, there was an increasing and highly significant trend in the association between multimorbidity and recurrent A&E episodes (p<0.001).

Amplitude in supraliminal condition Within the supraliminal presentation mode, the difference between naked and dressed OSS was highly significant with greater amplitudes for naked bodies (t(18) = 5.33, p <.001, Fig. 3A,C ).

A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (*), p < 0.01 highly significant (**) and p < 0.001 strongly significant (***).

Individual pair-wise tests during different years revealed no significant differences in species composition before the NTAR had been fully established, while differences between areas became highly significant (p < 0.001) from 2004 onwards.

The differences between the AZL-M and RAM groups were highly significant ( P <0.001).

Non-linear regression produced a highly significant negative exponential model (a = 190.250, SE a = 2.862; b = −0.172, SE b = 0.037; F = 32.9, p<0.001), in which distance from the breeding sites explained over 40% of the variance in GM female Anopheles gambiae s.l. trapped in villages ( Figure 3a ; R 2 = 0.417).

For the genus data set, when comparing each pair of samples, clustering was highly significant (raw p<0.001 and after the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, p<0.002).

A highly significant increase (P < 0.001) was observed in LDL-cholesterol and total cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol ratio in HFD group in comparison to the control group.

In non-matched force-rotation, interference was highly significant (Figure 5 D CF vs. nFR (7) , post-hoc , p < 0.001).

Although all pairwise comparisons between TMRCA, expansion time, and N e were highly significant ( P < 0.001, table 2 ), the ρ values ranged from 0.61 to 0.75.

These differences were highly significant (in both comparisons, P < 0.001).

Improvement over all groups from baseline to 3 months was highly significant on all three dependent variables: PDA, F 1,149 =160.93, P <.001, with the mean PDA increasing from 44% to 72%; DDD, F 1,149 =61.73, P <.001, with the mean decreasing from 8.0 to 4.6; and InDUC, F 1,149 =122.28, P <.001, with the overall mean decreasing from 40.8 to 19.5.

Using data for 159 districts, we found that the association between dry season and wet season incidence was also highly significant (p < 0.001) overall ( Figure 7 , panel B) and stratified by province or year (not shown), although the proportion of the total variation in epidemic magnitude accounted for by dry season incidence was lower (45%).

Using an independent samples t -test, mean differences between groups were highly significant for all vascular disease risk variables ( p- values<0.001).

Population structure Overall F ST value was highly significant ( F ST = 0.04; 95% Confidence Interval C.I . = 0.017 0.039; P <0.001) and pair-wise F ST revealed significant values for 107 out of 120 comparisons, after Bonferroni correction ( Table 4 ).

The difference between the two groups was highly significant (p<0.001, Student’s test, two-tailed, with Microsoft Excel) in terms of the evolution of the sequences, meaning that recent Guangxi CRF08_BC strains were more evolutionarily different from each other, suggesting perhaps that these strains undergo adaption that allows them to infect people in this locality.

The difference in the two localization patterns of the genomic loci is highly significant (p < 0.001), as evaluated by Mann-Whitney U test.

This number of simulations indicates a PRCC value of above 0.24 or below -0.24 is considered to be highly significant with a p value <0.001 [108] .

Our results show that for serial intervals of less than 2 days the observed effect of proximity (sharing a bay with someone else who was ill) is highly significant (p<0.001) and for serial intervals up to 2.5 days remained significant at the 5% level.

There was highly significant increase in serum Dickkopf-1 levels in postmenopausal females with abnormal T score versus controls ( P < 0.001).

The global tests (Table 3 ) reveal strong associations amongst the class II loci/regions, and, more particularly, amongst DRB , DQA1 , DQB1 and DPB1 , which appear to form a tight linkage group, where each locus/region is in highly significant GLD ( P < 0.001) with the others.

A one-way ANOVA performed on the mean emotion identification times with repeated measures of emotion type ( anger, disgust, fear , happiness , sadness and neutral ) revealed a highly significant effect of emotion [ F (5, 190) = 113.68; p < 0.001].