“highly significant”

Although the Pseudo R 2 is 0.0374, the overall model is highly significant (Wald chi 2 = 96.24, p < 0.001), indicating good explanatory power.

Nine genes from this training set were found to have an increased burden of novel damaging mutations in our ‘restricted-eating’ and ‘binge-eating’ groups representing a highly significant, more than four-fold enrichment for known ED genes (OR = 4.2, P< 0.001).

Warfarin (1.25 mg/kg) produced a highly significant ( p< 0.001) decrease in thrombus weight compared with the control group (6.93 ± 0.30 mg and 17.81 ± 0.75 mg, respectively) ( Table 1 ).

RESULTS The NOT-P, MNA ® scores, TC, HDL, iron, and Vitamin D 3 levels ranked higher in the controls, followed by mild/moderate/severe periodontitis groups, with highly significant (HS) differences ( P < 0.001).

All individual effect estimates remained highly significant (p < 0.001) in both models, and the magnitudes of these estimates did not vary appreciably (differences < 30%) except for the covariate for distance from the terminal, which was approximately 50% smaller for the non-fence line dataset (which consisted of points at somewhat greater distances from the airport).

The associations between sleep diaries and the one-channel EEG for TST, actigraphy and sleep diaries for TST, actigraphy and the one-channel EEG for TST and number of awakenings measured with one-channel EEG and sleep diaries were all highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The addition of sodium chloride led to a highly significant increase in renal sodium and chloride excretion ( p < 0.001).

One-way ANOVA (SES group) calculated at the end of each school year showed a highly significant SES effect from grade I to grade III ( p < 0.001), a moderate significant effect ( p = 0.016) at grade IV, and no effect at grade V ( p = 0.245).

Figure 2 showed that BMI was not a prognosticator in post-menopausal patients [log-rank test, p = 0.148 ( Figure 2c )], but was a highly significant prognostic factor in pre-menopausal patients [log-rank test, p < 0.001 ( Figure 2b)] or in all patients [log-rank test, p < 0.001 ( Figure 2a )].

Statistical correlational analysis: Fisher’s exact test Using a two-tailed Fisher’s exact test, the p value indicates a highly significant correlation between the proposed MAMILE-UNI’s predictions and malignancy status in pleural effusion, whether using cytology smear or cell block slides( p < 0.001).

A highly significant correlation between AREG and EREG mRNA expression was observed (Spearman ρ 2 = 0.736, p<0.001 ).

VEGF A & TGF β1 measured in arbitrary units (AU): Both growth factors showed highly significant scores in the CTG immersed in i-PRF analyzed in the CTG + i-PRF group, compared to the CTG alone from the CTG group ( P -value < 0.001), with large effect sizes for both growth factors suggesting a substantial magnitude of difference in growth factors expression between groups ( Table 5 ).

This is a total of 37 tests performed on 25 variables, having five significant values, of which one was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The overall ratio of 66 positive to 18 negative test results was highly significant (binomial test, p < 0.001), and the individual ratios of two of the three birds were significant at the p < 0.05, and that of one at the p < 0.01 level.

The value was found statistically highly significant with respect to age, nationality, and country of qualification respectively and similar p-value (p=0.001).

The highly significant differences observed in temporal synergy parameters (e.g., p < 0.001) suggest that dopaminergic medication substantially affects motor coordination, even within this cohort.

This between-group difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001), with a mean difference of 14.24 (95% CI: 9.81–18.67) and a large effect size (Cohen's d = 1.469).

Hemodynamic instability at presentation emerged as a highly significant predictor of adverse outcomes, with 46.5% of unstable patients experiencing complications compared with 25.2% of stable patients (p < 0.001) (Table 3 ).

There was a highly significant difference (p < 0.001) when comparing the data derived from PET-G moulds to the PMMA and PET-G/EVA moulds ( Table 3 ).

The values of Null allele‐corrected FST between pairwise population comparisons for all loci varied from 0.091 to 0.524 across populations and were highly significant ( p < 0.001) except between the Gilgel Gibe I Dam and Gojeb River (Table 7 ).

This relationship between the magnitude of initial resuscitation and the rate of O 2 D decrease was highly significant ( P < 0.001) and predicted later evidence of cell death and organ failure in 7-day postshock survivors [ 37 ].

Interestingly, we found a highly significant association ( p < 0.001) between VAGs ( ace , sprE , fsrA , fsrB , and cob ) and the formation of strong/moderate biofilms (data not shown).

The analysis revealed a highly significant reduction in alveolar cleft width following NAM therapy (p< 0.001).

For the soil depth treatment, we observed a highly significant main effect of soil depth, with deep soils having much higher NPP than shallow soils ( F 1,40 = 52.01, p < .001).

All bioactive compounds analyzed in the study (including fucoxanthin, chlorophylls (a, b, and c), total chlorophyll content, DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging activities, total polyphenol, flavonoid, phlorotannin, phylloquinone, and cobalamin contents) showed highly significant interactions with drying conditions and sea mustard waste parts ( p < 0.001).