“highly significant”

lingzhi The applied microbiological assay to estimate the effect of Reishi supplementation on the growth rate of the applied stains revealed the potential prebiotic effect of the studied mushroom that was confirmed by the highly significant MANOVA overall test (Wilk’s λ < 0.001; p < 0.001) together with the follow-up tests for the measured E. coli and L. casei initial and end count growth rates (F(5;12) > 8.97; p < 0.001).

For those participants, the alcohol content was unknown; 36(66.7%) were using 1–3 times a day hand sanitizer while those sanitizers had single alcohol were used more than 20 times/day by 21(63.6%), which was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

One way ANOVA test showed highly significant alteration within different groups in Shear bond strength with a p-value < 0.001 (Table 3 - see PDF).

The analysis demonstrated a highly significant positive effect of song familiarity on the degree of fun perception (B = 0.774, p < 0.001), confirming Hypothesis H1a.

In conclusion, this systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates, through two different models, a highly significant ( p < 0.001) benefit of pinaverium treatment over placebo in relieving/resolving symptoms in patients with IBS.

In flexibility and balance, the differences between respective mean values between the 6th week and the 12th-week end were highly significant (P < 0.001).

The effect size in the pooled analysis of balanced studies (ie, studies in which major clinical indicators are similarly distributed between arms) was 1.417 (95% CI 1.171-1.715), and the P value was highly significant at P <.001.

Across-environment ANOVA showed highly significant differences ( P < 0.001) for environments, genotypes, and genotype × environment interaction (GE) for all traits studied.

The calculation of the ICC indicated, as shown in Table 8 , that the precision of the instrument’s estimates was highly significant ( p < .001), for the total scale and for the four subscales, and that the values for temporal stability were all satisfactory in the interval estimate of 95% confidence ( A.

Notably, the increase in CD127 + γδ Tcell frequencies was highly significant in BAL at d1 (P<0.001) and 1-week (P=0.001) that returned to baseline by 3-week time-point, when BCG was likely cleared as no live bacteria was recovered from BAL fluid at that time.

In the depression model for females, age and income were found to be highly significant (p < 0.001).

However, the main effect of SOA was highly significant ( F (1.98, 31.66) = 78.62; p = 0.001, ηp 2 = 0.83), showing that the interval between stimuli determined their temporal discriminability.

Both difference were found to be highly significant by applying a generalized linear model in R (p < 0.001) 64 .

This effect was most pronounced in the age group of 0-39 years, where the decrease was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The difference was statistically highly significant, especially during the recovery period, i.e., at 1 min and 5 min after exercise ( P = 0.001 each).

Here, * p < 0.05 stands for significant, ** p < 0.01 for highly significant, *** p < 0.001 for extremely significant and **** p < 0.0001 for most significant, ns not significant.

Quantitative analysis revealed a highly significant increase in the ratio of green-to-red fluorescence signals in cells treated with cfChPs ( p < 0.001; Fig. 4d ).

The hematologic recovery (following the withdrawal of rEPO) with and without immunosuppressive therapy was highly significant (57% vs. 2%, respectively, P < 0.001); and nearly 95% had complete recovery following renal transplantation ( n = 19 cases).

Generally, a higher percentage of persons were infected by increasing overall COVID-19-JEM score, with a highly significant difference between score group 0 (10.5% infected) and score group 21–24 (16.2% infected), Χ 2 ( 1 )= 601.5, P<0.001.

For instance, although the categorical NRI of 0.038 was not significant when comparing BMI + TyG to BMI ( P = 0.105), the IDI of 0.003 was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The mean MRD 1 at the 1st week was greater in group A than group B and this difference was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

At T 1 , the between-group reduction in bleeding was not significant for C (22%, p = 0.03) and highly significant ( p < 0.001) for CX and P (29% and 44%).

From post-wounding day 4 onwards, 5% (w/w) aqueous fraction ointments showed highly significant ( p < 0.001) wound contraction when compared to all simple, 5% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction, 10% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction, 5% (w/w) hexane fraction, and 10% (w/w) hexane fraction ointments.

This habitat-driven structure was verified with a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) test on the NMDS1 & NMDS2 coordinates, with habitat being a highly significant variable ( p < 0.001) in explaining the variance in the combined NMDS coordinate distributions and each coordinate separately.

A three factor ANOVA testing for the effects of zeitgeber period, day length and genotype on the phase of E activity (done for T22 to T28) revealed highly significant effects of all factors on the timing of E activity, zeitgeber period: F (3,663) = 496.96; p < .001; day length: F (2,663) = 2943.38; p < .001; genotype: F (1,663) = 2716.92; p < .001.