Show that there was a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.001**) between the total level of food handlers’ knowledge and the total level of practices regarding food safety standards immediately following the implementation of the on-the-job training program.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
In contrast, the ER/MT enriched fractions (#7 and #8) that display low detectable PrP res levels, contained high infectivity levels similar to the lipid raft enriched fractions, with the discrepancy at fraction #8 highly significant (p < 0.001; two way ANOVA).
Similarly, Machiavellianism's effect on cyber dating abuse is also highly significant and positive (B = 0.455; SE = 0.028; t = 16.477; p < 0.001).
In general, the markers were distributed homogeneously along the chromosome as indicated by the highly significant correlation (r 2 = 0.95, P < 0.001) between segment size and number of markers.
Exploratory factor analysis KMO was 0.93, MSA ranged from 0.80 to 0.96, and Bartlett’s test was highly significant ( p < .001), indicating suitability of the data for EFA.
However, both groups demonstrated a highly significant reduction in plaque scores across all tooth regions after brushing ( p < 0.001).
Time main effects were highly significant for all primary and secondary outcomes (all F (1, 18) ≥ 42.465, p < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.70–0.99).
Our primary model of interest (see “Model 1” in “ Statistical analyses ”) on the cooperation scores revealed a highly significant impact of SVO on cooperation (F (1,149) = 20.222, p < 0.001), a significant main effect of the inductions (F (2,149) = 3.785, p = 0.0.025), and a significant interaction between SVO and the inductions (F (2,149) = 5.482, p = 0.005) (the model estimates are plotted in Fig. 4 ).
Highly significant community level differences were observed between Fraction (PERMANOVA p-value < 0.001), Collection (PERMANOVA p-value < 0.001) and feed (PERMANOVA p-value < 0.001) based on the Bray–Curtis distances while less significant changes were contributed by breed (PERMANOVA p-value = 0.037) (Table 1 ).
Notably, highly significant differences in soil temperature and water content at all depths were observed between the freezing and thawing periods ( p < 0.001, Fig. 3 ).
Bathing ability showed highly significant decline during this period (difference = 0.427, p < 0.001), representing one of the most pronounced single-transition deteriorations observed.
Roger test confirmed a highly significant seasonality ( P < 0.001).
The PPI network was highly significant (p-value < 0.001) at medium confidence (0.400) with 88 nodes, 140 edges, and an average node degree of 3.18.
The trend over AUC adj was highly significant ( P < 0.001).
The overall treatment effect (Model) was highly significant for all three enzymes ( P < 0.001).
P ‐value was considered significant (* P < 0.05), very significant (** P < 0.01) or highly significant (*** P < 0.001).
P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, P < 0.01 was highly significant, and P < 0.001 was more significant when compared with corresponding values.
The results revealed highly significant differences in CAI values ( p < 0.001) (Fig. 6 A), N C values ( p < 0.001) (Fig. 6 B), and ω ratios ( p < 0.001) (Fig. 6 C) between ancestral and extant sequences, suggesting distinct evolutionary dynamics in codon usage and selective pressures between the two groups.
Crucially, temporal co-occurrence matrices across Sessions 1 and 2 showed a similar structure ( Fig 2A and 2D ), and the average similarity between the two sessions across participants was highly significant ( r = 0.7, p < 0.001).
Each assessed HBR risk factor showed a highly significant association (p<0.001), reflecting a strong consensus among the respondents regarding their clinical relevance.
The overall F st value of 0.059 suggested moderate but highly significant ( P < 0.001) differentiation between subgroups.
A GLM analysis revealed a highly significant effect of aphid line on sex ratio ( p < 0.001).
The test for an odds ratio DOR of 1 produced a z-value of 10.69 with a highly significant p < 0.001, indicating strong evidence against the null hypothesis (DOR = 1) and suggesting a significant association in the overall analysis.
The incubation of all BODIPY-labeled AMs with LUVs showed a highly significant increment of r ( p < 0.001, unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t -test, Figure 2 A, Table 1 ), suggesting a lower rotational freedom of the probe in the presence of LUVs.
8 -A), pH and SF were found to be significantly positively correlated with eight DEPs, with peroxiredoxin-1 and superoxide dismutase [Cu—Zn] showing highly significant positive correlations with SF ( P ≤ 0.001).