“marginal significance”

The group of obese women in our study reached only marginal significance (p<0.10) though.

As for the cases of deaths due to COVID-19, the association is observed with temporality of the epidemiological weeks (χ2 = 2599.84; df = 1; p-value <0.001), PHC coverage strata (χ2 = 24.85; df = 2; p-value <0.001), PHC quality strata (χ2 = 55.42; df = 1; p-value <0.001) and social isolation rate (χ2 = 9.48; gl = 1; p-value = 0.002) as well as the demographic density (χ2 = 3.12; df = 1; p-value = 0.07), bed/population ratio (χ2 = 2.75; df = 1; p-value = 0.09) and the quantity of COVID-19 cases (χ2 = 3.10; df = 1; p-value = 0.07) diagnosed with marginal significance ( p-value <0.10), Table 3 .

While some of the associations for obesity reached marginal significance ( p < 0.10), there was no discernible association with general health and injury.

The incidence of postoperative complication was higher in the lower extremity group but with marginal significance (0% vs 36.3%, P = 0.1).

All tests were two‐sided, with significance defined as p < 0.05 and marginal significance as 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10.

These analyses were performed using R 4.1.0 (R core Team) with significant differences defined at p < 0.05, and a marginal significance at p < 0.1.

We observed a small but significant increase in PGE 2 in HaCaT exposed to calcipotriol; pre-incubation with AVX001 reduced the stimulatory effect, reaching marginal significance ( p < 0.1) at the highest dose used (3 μM) ( Figure 1 C).

The level of statistical marginal significance was set at 0.05 < p < 0.10, as described in [ 53 ]. 3.

Marginal significance (0.05 < p < 0.10) was also reported for group main and interaction effects, as these values may indicate trends toward statistical significance (Amrhein et al. 2019 ).

( 2015 ) criterion for “marginal significance” ( P < 0.10).

A positive effect was also observed at a marginal significance level in the “equal subjective age” group ( p < 0.1, Model 2).

A Moran’s I test also indicated significant spatial autocorrelation ( p = 0.001) in the rates for TROs and marginal significance for VSOs ( p = 0.10).

Statistical significance was indicated if P < 0.05 and marginal significance if 0.05 ≤ P < 0.10.

Most incremental validity tests (step 2) were significant, with exceptions being that the dissatisfied/inefficient phenotype only reached marginal significance (i.e.,.05 < p < .10) over most sleep characteristics in the M2 sample and the irregular sleeper phenotype did not significantly predict cardiovascular conditions above any individual sleep characteristics in the MR sample.

The result of the KMP database indicated that high expression levels of USP10, USP14, and USP39 were significantly related to a poor OS in PDAC patients while USP18 expression showed a marginal significance (0.05 < P < 0.1) and USP32 and USP33 were not significant associated with the OS of PDAC patients.

While occupation approached marginal significance (F = 1.64, p = 0.103), education level (F = 0.57) and species preference (F = 0.38) proved irrelevant (both p > 0.05).

Meta-regression analysis showed significant effect size modification for studies adjusted for SES ( p = 0.033) and marginal significance for studies adjusted for presence of a TB patient in the household ( p = 0.105).

Analysis of ciliopathy genes and their subsets The SKAT rare variant association test between the case ( n = 13) and control ( n = 30) groups showed marginal significance for JBTMKS after Bonferroni correction ( P = 0.1054, Table 3 ) from the Invitae.

For anxiety, vegetable intake showed a nonsignificant inverse trend (β = −0.235, p = 0.141), whereas sweetened beverages approached marginal significance in a positive direction (β = 0.246, p = 0.108).

As found for incongruent-same trials, the alignment × experiment interaction failed to reach at least marginal significance ( F (1,82) = 2.63, p = 0.109), which means that flatter alignment slopes of incongruent trials in Experiment 2 compared to Experiment 1 could not be confirmed at any significance level with the given sample size, neither with incongruent-same trials (see Fig. 6 ), nor with all incongruent trials (see Figs. 4 and 5 ).

Although 2006 approaches marginal significance ( p = 0.109), the overall evidence suggests that spatial clustering had not yet become a stable structural feature during this phase.

Recurrent subgroup tended to have longer follow-up time than ORN one with marginal significance ( P = 0.109).

Specifically, although three EGFR SNPs were statistically significant, we found only marginal significance of EGFR at the gene level (min P = 0.11 and 0.06, respectively) in UCSF and MDA data sets.

Knocking down the mutant p53 and re-expressing WT p53 in T47D Palbo-R cells reduced synergy with marginal significance ( P < 0.11), but significantly reduced the sensitivity to the combination treatment (Supplementary Fig.

Marginal significance was observed for the relationship describing increased epithelial TLR4 staining and decreased OS (p = 0.11).