“marginal significance”

There was a marginal significance ( p < 0.11), in a shortening of RT for FCC 100 when compared to FCC 20 .

In the high-saliency condition, however, the misfit approached marginal significance, G 2 (1) = 2.56, p = .11, ω = .02.

The interaction of validity and previous visibility just failed to reached marginal significance, F (1, 20) = 2.84, p = 0.11.

In addition, we only found marginal significance for seed production ( χ 2 = 1.5, P = 0.11).

The mean level of H3K27 trimethylation (associated with gene repression) was significantly decreased in the autism compared with control samples ( P = 0.02), and the mean level of histone H3K4 trimethylation (associated with gene activation) in the EN-2 promoter was increased in autism relative to the matched control samples with marginal significance ( P =0.11).

No other significant correlations were observed, though abnormal_sum demonstrated a negative trend with SIR_3 year ( p = 0.111, marginal significance).

Patients with high Noggin and RBPMS2 expression at the invasive front demonstrated a marginal significance for longer DFS compared with other groups ( P = 0.111, Fig. 3 a), but not in OS ( P = 0.290, Fig. 3 c).

In addition, BMI with marginal significance (P = 0.111) was also included in multivariate analysis because of its acknowledged prognostic value for GC and broad application in clinical practice.

However, the difference between the summary effects in the two continents reached only marginal significance ( Q =2.53, P =0.112).

With these evidences, as well as the almost marginal significance in original recessive model, the non-significant result ( P = 0.114) in our sensitive analysis may be mostly due to the insufficient sample size.

For female respondents, age ( p = 0.016***) and education level ( p = 0.047***) emerged as the strongest predictors, with floor level showing marginal significance ( p = 0.115*), suggesting women’s safety awareness is more strongly influenced by socio-demographic factors and environmental context.

Furthermore, we noted a marginal significance indicating a slight increase in Mu power and a reduction in the subjective sensation of action control following EEG-NFT ( p = 0.119).

Correlation analysis revealed ( Figure 6 D) a statistically significant relationship between Fos and Th1 cells (r = −0.287, p < 0.05), while the correlation between Fos and Treg cells was near marginal significance (r = −0.196, p = 0.12).

For Reflection, none of the post hoc comparisons examined in the process of unpacking the 3-way interaction reached significance after Holm-Bonferroni correction, with only the ΔB1-to-B2 parameter estimate for females approaching even marginal significance, β = −0.64, t = 2.45, p = 0.12, η p 2 = 0.16.

Going back to our choice of the parsimonious model, even though the one we arrived at did not significantly differ with the MMP-Model, there was a trend toward marginal significance ( p = 0.121), and thus one might wonder whether our results would change had we adopted the more complex model.

This creates some noise that may explain why correlation between these two parameters only reached marginal significance ( p = 0.1223).

The nonembedded condition (which was not realized in Experiment 2) showed a significant reaction time disadvantage for targets not embedded in words (931 ms) compared to nonwords (874 ms), t (22) = 5.22, p < .05. However, the previous advantage of targets embedded in words (863 ms) over nonwords (874 ms) was found, but only approached marginal significance ( p = .127).

A marginal significance was also observed for Luminal A in all cases except for DSS in the Validation group ( p -value = 0.128).

Both TEAD gene sets have marginal significance ( Figure 7—figure supplement 2C,D ; p=0.13 and 0.15, respectively).

The association with ferritin was positive while slightly missing the marginal significance level(r = 0.28, p = 0.13), with consideration of the relatively small sample size.

3 ), baseline BCVA (HR,0.31; 95% CI, 0.12–0.81; P = .02) appeared to be a significant prognostic factor, while intraoperative IAI showed marginal significance (HR, 2.73; 95% CI, 0.73–10.13; P = .13).

The tendencies of the main findings were generally maintained regardless of daily sleep duration, in which the analysis showed marginal significance (p-value = 0.1303).

In contrast, the entropy of PH2 was higher for the patient group compared with the control group, although the observed difference only reached marginal significance (Welch's t‐test, family‐wise error correction using the Westfall‐Young method; adjusted P ‐value = 0.131).

In the validation set, marginal significance was likewise obtained on the difference between the two groups ( P = 0.132) ( Figure 2B ).

Although it was with marginal significance, the lower gene expressions of Tlr4 ( p = 0.138, t -test vs.