“marginal significance”

A comparison of the two groups identified that LEDD was the only demographic which reached marginal significance, with participants in the SFG group treated with a higher LEDD ( M = 1015) compared to participants in the NSFG ( M = 694; p =.054).

The findings revealed that higher expression levels of FAM72B, C, and D were substantially linked with lower overall survival (p < 0.001, p = 0.002, and p = 0.002, respectively) while FAM72A showed marginal significance (p = 0.054) ( Table 2 ).

There was a marginal significance that the MTRR 66GG carriers had a higher serum total cholesterol level compared with 66AA carriers (β (SE): 0.14 (0.09), P = 0.054).

Meta-analysis suggested a higher success rate in Biodentine group than CH group at a marginal significance (OR = 6.03, 95%CI: 0.97–37.6, P = 0.054; S5 Fig ).

However, we noticed that the MDA concentrations were lower in PCOS patients with the dominant genotype of VDR-TaqI than in PCOS patients carrying the TT genotype, but the observed difference had marginal significance ( p = 0.054).

In a fully saturated model simultaneously including sex, mechanical ventilation and comorbidity count (six predictors for 33 events, well beyond the events-per-variable limit), the AISI effect retained a comparable magnitude (aOR 2.57) but reached only marginal significance (95% CI 0.98–6.72, p = 0.054), an attenuation attributable to over-parameterization rather than to loss of signal, and one that underscores why the pre-specified parsimonious model was the appropriate primary specification.

Ki-67 was associated with PD, but with marginal significance (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.0–1.04; P = 0.054).

Low BMI was associated with POD with marginal significance ( p = 0.054).

In multivariable analyses, older age (odds ratio [OR], 2.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.49–3.19; P < 0.001), low surgical volume (OR, 5.90; 95% CI, 2.10–17.01; P < 0.001), and high CPB time (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.08–1.18; P < 0.001) were identified as significant independent predictors of early mortality, while blood hemoglobin level showed marginal significance (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.54–0.99; P = 0.054).

Cox regression analysis identified lymph node metastasis as the only independent risk factor for reduced PFS (p = 0.004), with MLH1/PMS2 loss showing marginal significance (p = 0.054) [ 7 ].

In the multivariate analysis, high HCT‐CI (≥3) was the only independent factor for higher NRM (HR, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.11–7.90; p = 0.030), and ECOG score ≥2 was the only independent factor for inferior OS (HR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.15–5.16; p = 0.020) and DFS (HR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.13–4.02; p = 0.020), with marginal significance of disease status at transplantation for DFS (HR, 2.19; 95% CI, 0.99–4.88; p = 0.054) (Table 4 ).

Statistical significance between MRS and endometriosis in the combined model was only observed in the CIR ( p = 0.0072) test set, yet marginal significance was also seen in the UCSF ( p = 0.0541) and IMB ( p = 0.0697) test sets.

Only SNP 9508994 (C/T) in the mother genome was found to interact with SNP 20209376 with marginal significance (p-value = 0.0547).

In addition, although isolated effects of the SNP TNF -857C > T were not observed, the combination of both variants of the TNF gene resulted in marginal significance ( P = 0.0547) in terms of the protection against the disease.

Postoperative tibial end-of-stem pain was reported in 9.8% of the non-screw group, while none (0%) in the screw group, reflecting marginal significance ( P = 0.0548).

After the stepwise multivariable linear regression analysis with adjustment for covariates, fasting insulin, HbA1c and A/G ratio were found to be negatively associated with serum irisin with statistical significance, while waist circumference was negatively associated with irisin level with statistically marginal significance (p = 0.055).

pylori history approached marginal significance ( P = 0.055).

The INFLA score had a partial mediating effect with marginal significance, with PM for 2.4% ( P = 0.055) and NIE for HR (95%CI): (1.0126, 0.9999–1.0256, P = 0.052) (Fig. 3 I).

In HTRA1 , rs11200638 (G>A), showed marginal significance with DR (P = 0.055) while rs10490924 in LOC387715 gave a P = 0.07.

In the multivariate ternary logistic regression, we found that mean training pace (AOR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.80 to 1.04, p = 0.007) and PSQI (AOR = 2.27, 95% CI: 1.27 to 4.06, p = 0.005) were independent predictive factors for half-marathon performance, while monthly running distance shows marginal significance (AOR = 0.997, 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.00, p = 0.055) (Supplementary Table 1 ).

Several hematological ratios demonstrated marginal significance: MLR ( p = 0.055), MHR ( p = 0.027), PHR ( p = 0.039), and SII, SIRI, and NHR approached statistical significance.

001) and specific adversities including emotional abuse (B = 0.244, p < 0.001), emotional neglect (B = 0.319, p < 0.001), physical neglect (B = 0.294, p < 0.001) and with physical abuse showing marginal significance (B = 0.165, p = 0.055).

A lower risk was observed in patients on treatment for thyroid pathology with marginal significance ( p = 0.055).

1-AP also had a negative link (β = −37) with marginal significance ( P = 0.055).

PD-L1 exhibited marginal significance among distinct subtypes (Kruskal-Wallis, p=0.055; figure 1A ) and was still a predictor for PFS (HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.98 to 1.00, p=0.005) when adjusting for PTCL subtypes in the multivariate Cox regression algorithm ( figure 1C and online supplemental figure S1B ), indicating the strong and relatively independent predictive capability of PD-L1.