“marginal significance”

S7 , the low NLR cutoff subgroup exhibited predictive value for AKI (OR 1.526, 95% CI 1.38–1.68, p < 0.001) without significant inter-study heterogenicity ( I 2 = 29.1%), whereas the high-cutoff group showed limited predictive utility with marginal significance (OR 1.334, 95% CI 1.00–1.79, p = 0.0535) and the heterogenicity in this subgroup remained significant ( I 2 = 93%).

In addition, IL-1RA concentrations differed with a statistically marginal significance ( p = 0.0535) between the two severity subgroups.

( 42 ), NLR had a statistically significant association with ORR (p = 0.016), while PLR had a marginal significance (p = 0.0536). 3.2.6 Head and neck cancers A study by Lee et al.

The variant rs7726414 in TCF7 showed marginal significance in the discovery population ( P = 5.37 × 10 −2 ), while no solid evidence of associations was observed for the others (with P values of 0.16–0.77).

Grade 3–4 fatigue was more common in the IPE arm with marginal significance (2 vs 11%, P =0.054).

This pattern was also seen in the multivariable model adjusted for SES factors (TC-BC, P = .016; TC-1st, P = .006; BC-1st, P = .789) but not in multivariable adjustment for both SES factors and tumor characteristics (all P > .05), except for an HR of 0.568 (95% CI, 0.319-1.011) for TC-1st vs TCnoBC, showing a marginal significance ( P = .054).

Cox regression analysis identified lymph node metastasis as the only independent risk factor for reduced PFS (p = 0.004), with MLH1/PMS2 loss showing marginal significance (p = 0.054) [ 7 ].

More, marginal significance was observed for loss of liberty (U = 70.98, p < 0.054).

Furthermore, the presence of IICP symptoms before surgery showed a marginal significance (HR: 2.29, 95% CI: 0.99–5.30, p = 0.054).

On the other hand, there was no reduction in total bacterial load over time, but there was a marginal significance (p = 0.054).

Notably, certain variables exhibited marginal significance in univariate analysis (e.g., BUN in the internal validation cohort, p = 0.054).

Low BMI was associated with POD with marginal significance ( p = 0.054).

While high TROP2 showed a marginal significance with high Ki67 at 20% cutoff ( P = .054).

A potential interaction (multiplicative effect) between smoking and inactive TB in the development of airflow limitation was identified, with marginal significance ( P = 0.054).

There was a marginal significance that the MTRR 66GG carriers had a higher serum total cholesterol level compared with 66AA carriers (β (SE): 0.14 (0.09), P = 0.054).

A similar pattern was observed for the left caudate, but the negative associations in both male and female participants reached only a marginal significance level ( P = 0.054 or 0.055, respectively) (Fig. 2 ).

In a fully saturated model simultaneously including sex, mechanical ventilation and comorbidity count (six predictors for 33 events, well beyond the events-per-variable limit), the AISI effect retained a comparable magnitude (aOR 2.57) but reached only marginal significance (95% CI 0.98–6.72, p = 0.054), an attenuation attributable to over-parameterization rather than to loss of signal, and one that underscores why the pre-specified parsimonious model was the appropriate primary specification.

Silicone oil tamponade was more frequently used in the open group than in the closed group with marginal significance (75.4% vs. 56.8%, p = 0.054).

Further sLORETA brain source estimations performed at different moment in time showed marginal significance ( t = 1.221, p = 0.054) between prime type (stranger vs. friend) in Brodmann area 6 between 570–580 ms, and significant differences ( t = 1.588, p = 0.047) in Brodmann area 40 between 740–750 ms ( t = 1.588, p = 0.047).

Body weight showed marginal significance ( p = 0.054), indicating a potential but inconclusive trend.

As evident from the table, the inhibition [(RT differences between incongruent and congruent trials)/congruent trials] of the Flanker task exhibited a negative correlation with general anxiety, albeit with marginal significance ( r =-.292, p =.054), which suggests that weaker ability of inhibition (higher score) is associated with lower anxiety.

The ABCB1 3435TT genotype was also associated with a lower risk of death with marginal significance not shown to be an independent prognostic factor (HR 0.245, 95% CI = 0.059–1.026; P = 0.054).

The clinical remission rate showed marginal significance ( p = 0.054), whereas MH was significantly more frequent with IFX than placebo ( p = 0.006).

Notably, the intraoperative diagnosis section showed marginal significance for conciseness ( p = 0.054), failing to reach the significance threshold.

However, we noticed that the MDA concentrations were lower in PCOS patients with the dominant genotype of VDR-TaqI than in PCOS patients carrying the TT genotype, but the observed difference had marginal significance ( p = 0.054).