“marginal significance”

The pretreatment predictors or factors could be associated with poor/good outcomes even in the successfully recanalized AIS patients, and univariate logistic regression (Table 3 ) showed an association between volume of Tmax > 12s (critically hypoperfused region) and favorable outcome, but only had a marginal significance (OR, 0.986; 95% CI, 0.971-1, p = 0.055).

The model including shape, margin, and internal enhancement as predictor variables could significantly distinguish between malignant and non-malignant lesions ( p = 0.038; pseudo R 2 = 0.24), round shape independently reaching significance (OR: 12.91; 95% CI: 2.33-71.45; p = 0.003) and rim enhancement reaching marginal significance (OR: 7.15; 95% CI: 0.96-53.19; p = 0.055).

In HTRA1 , rs11200638 (G>A), showed marginal significance with DR (P = 0.055) while rs10490924 in LOC387715 gave a P = 0.07.

On multivariate analysis, higher RT dose was identified as favorable prognostic factor with marginal significance (p = 0.055) for the LC of lesions where RT was applied ( Table 3 ).

Additionally, miR-4497 in the AR group was downregulated by 1.665290 times compared to the control group (raw p = 0.00492151); however, after FDR correction, the p value showed marginal significance (corrected p = 0.05563991).

4B ), while a marginal significance was observed for fiber as a mediator of the relationship between Lachnospiraceae UCG-001 and UPPS-urgency ( p = 0.056; Supplementary Table 6 ).

With a marginal significance ( p = 0.056) and a contribution of 6.46% to the variation, Cr2C3 may have a small but significant impact that merits further investigation.

Water potentials of intact branches declined with marginal significance throughout the day ( P = 0.056), whereas excised branches exhibited no significant diurnal variation ( P = 0.26; Figure 2 ).

The variable “Type of Pulmonary Resection—Pneumonectomy” showed marginal significance (OR = 2.38, 95% CI: 0.98-5.80, P = 0.056) and was retained in the final model despite a significance level slightly above the conventional 5% threshold ( P < 0.06).

However, the difference in EMIC stigma score showed marginal significance between grade II and grade 0 combined with grade I (p = 0.056), not shown in table.

However, a marginal significance for glycaemic response was noted between UKMRC9 and Jasmine ( p = 0.056) ( Figure 1 a), which was also reflected by their IAUC glu ( p = 0.06) ( Figure 1 a i ).

LDL-C showed marginal significance (AUC=0.607, P=0.056), while TC failed to show discriminatory ability (AUC=0.584, P=0.134).

However, TD children exhibited significant differences between TC and nTC ( p = 0.043), marginal significance for nTC and Onset ( p = 0.056), and no significant difference between TC and Onset, as demonstrated in Figure 3 .

IOP fluctuation during the follow-up period (standard deviation of IOPs obtained during the follow-up) was higher in patients with retinoschisis with marginal significance (P = 0.056).

The light intensity for the average depth of the Chaoborus population under ALAN conditions was thus two orders of magnitude higher (with marginal significance according to the Wilcoxon rank sum test, W 1, 9 = 22, p = 0.056) and demonstrated a two orders of magnitude higher variability of this parameter (Fig. 4 ).

The one-way ANOVA reached marginal significance [ F (6, 112) = 2.123, p = .056, η 2 = .10]; however, corrected Bonferroni post hoc tests did not show statistical differences between different emotions in accuracy (all p s > .10).

A similar tendency was observed for median ATI; however, it had only marginal significance ( p = 0.056).

We found that there was a marginal significance for RFS in ER-negative (ER-) group with higher PA1-nuc level ( Figure S1 B, P = 0.056).

Although the latter outcome should be interpreted with caution due to its marginal significance ( p = .056), the directionally positive change provides initial evidence that positive affect priming has the potential to spillover and influence how people interpret COVID‐19 vaccines.

Marginal significance ( p = 0.056, LSD test) suggests this difference may be clinically relevant, likely reflecting its transitional role in transmitting tensile forces from tendons.

The annual injury incidence did not differ by family status except that the incidence was higher, with marginal significance, for children living with their father only than mother only (18.9% vs 13.5%, P = 0.056, Table 1 ).

Decomposition of the interaction revealed that mothers' amygdala response was significantly greater for happy than sad faces of their own infant (coefficient = 0.23, z = 2.67, p = 0.008), whereas the reverse pattern was observed for unknown infant faces, with marginal significance (coefficient = −0.16, z = 1.91, p = 0.056).

Additionally, CVAI showed marginal significance with menopause ( P = 0.056), suggesting a potential association between visceral fat accumulation and menopause.

In comparison, fractional anisotropy of the right FAT exhibited marginal significance in its correlation ( p = .056) with Picture Vocabulary Test.

Significant interannual differences in the annual cumulative CH 4 uptake were observed across all treatments, and the stimulating effect of moss cover on annual cumulative CH 4 uptake varied with years at a marginal significance level ( p = 0.056) ( Table 1 ).