“marginal significance”

Region-wise, the prevalence of past natural infection at baseline was similar across all regions, with the exception of the slightly higher prevalence in Kilimanjaro, a difference that had marginal significance (χ 2 = 9.21, p =0.056).

IOP fluctuation during the follow-up period (standard deviation of IOPs obtained during the follow-up) was higher in patients with retinoschisis with marginal significance (P = 0.056).

Significant interannual differences in the annual cumulative CH 4 uptake were observed across all treatments, and the stimulating effect of moss cover on annual cumulative CH 4 uptake varied with years at a marginal significance level ( p = 0.056) ( Table 1 ).

Mural nodules were more often observed in BCCA with marginal significance (41.7% vs. 5.9%, p =0.056).

The univariate analysis revealed that elevated postoperative CA19-9 (95% CI, 1.45-43.92; P = .017) was significantly associated with poor OS, and positive resection margin was associated with marginal significance (95% CI, 0.96-34.48; P = .056).

We found that there was a marginal significance for RFS in ER-negative (ER-) group with higher PA1-nuc level ( Figure S1 B, P = 0.056).

The interaction between gender and exposure showed marginal significance ( P = 0.056), suggesting potential gender-based differences in the effect of social disadvantage on long COVID.

For 0° face, there was also a negative correlation between the proportional fixation time and the total score and reached the marginal significance ( p = 0.056).

Only the copula term associated with IC → TA approached marginal significance at the 10% level (β = −0.298, t = 1.908, p = 0.056).

Stage 2 modeling indicated that change in the mindfulness score at 3 months (MAAS-D2) could be a potential mediator of intervention effects ( P < 0.05 for both β and γ pathways) on the ARI illness severity (optimism, positive emotion, social support, and mental health models) as well as duration (exercise intensity, optimism, and social support models; and marginal significance in the mental health model, P = 0.056 for β 13 pathway).

Water potentials of intact branches declined with marginal significance throughout the day ( P = 0.056), whereas excised branches exhibited no significant diurnal variation ( P = 0.26; Figure 2 ).

Greenhouse gas emissions showed marginal significance in Model 1 ( p = 0.056) and were excluded from Model 2, indicating a weak and inconsistent association.

Decomposition of the interaction revealed that mothers' amygdala response was significantly greater for happy than sad faces of their own infant (coefficient = 0.23, z = 2.67, p = 0.008), whereas the reverse pattern was observed for unknown infant faces, with marginal significance (coefficient = −0.16, z = 1.91, p = 0.056).

The number of S2 was positively correlated with GAD-7 score at a marginal significance ( P = 0.056).

Additionally, CVAI showed marginal significance with menopause ( P = 0.056), suggesting a potential association between visceral fat accumulation and menopause.

Attitude had marginal significance ( P = 0.056), where those with an unfavourable attitude had a reduced likelihood of participation (OR = 0.292, 95% CI: 0.083–1.034).

However, OR for obesity of girls in the UC was 1.47, showing a marginal significance ( p = 0.056). 4.

IL-8 demonstrated only marginal significance in ROC analysis (adjusted P = 0.056) yet emerged as a robust independent predictor in Cox regression analysis.

Down-regulation of 15-PGDH was revealed in the patient group with increased preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, indicating a statistically marginal significance (P = 0.056).

Second order partial difference between the square-radial and the square-paraboloidal figures was significant [ t (28) = 1.14, p = 0.006], whereas the partial difference between the square-radial and the square-elliptic figures reached marginal significance ( p = 0.056).

However, maternal TG (log-transformed) tended to be associated with LGA offspring, whereby this difference showed marginal significance by the end of pregnancy (visit 3: OR:3.25, 95%CI:0.97 to 11.42, p = 0.056, visit 4: OR:3.84, 95%CI:1.01 to 15.61, p = 0.048).

Male subjects are shown to have a higher risk of presentation delay compared to their female counterparts, although the association demonstrates marginal significance (odds ratio (OR) = 1.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99–2.88, p = 0.056).

The LD between CAPN1 316 and CAPN1 4751 was intermediate in terms of D′ (0.2672), but showed very low allelic association (r 2 = 0.0212), with the chi-square test indicating marginal significance (χ 2 = 3.649, p = 0.056).

However, the difference in EMIC stigma score showed marginal significance between grade II and grade 0 combined with grade I (p = 0.056), not shown in table.

MV showed a strong, although the p value indicates marginal significance, association with CA-UTI (OR: 7.300, p = 0.056).