MV showed a strong, although the p value indicates marginal significance, association with CA-UTI (OR: 7.300, p = 0.056).
← all phrases
“marginal significance”
Sighted at
p=0.07
In the literature
okinavana (15.8 ± 1.6) (marginal significance, P = 0.0561), which also leads to a higher pulse frequency of the former (10.8 ± 1.0 pulses/sec vs. 8.4 ± 0.3 pulses/sec; P < 0.01).
Also, although with a marginal significance, the authors can say with some degree of certainty that it is expected that 64% of the French Bulldogs present CAT (p= 0.0562).
The minimal pressure which showed marginal significance ( P = 0.0566) in the previous study, 15 was significant in our study ( P = 0.003).
In the Cox PH regression analysis, marginal significance for in-hospital mortality was observed in Model 4, which examined whether PCT and PSP were above Q1 ( p = 0.0566).
After cluster adjustment, the group effect for total verbal peer aggression was attenuated and reached only marginal significance, B = −1.299, SEcluster = 0.430, t (3) = −3.017, p = 0.057, 95% CI [−2.668, 0.071].
For the chest press, the comparisons between trained college students and both older adult groups showed marginal significance that did not reach the adjusted threshold (trained vs. recreationally active: estimate = -0.070, p = 0.057; trained vs. sedentary: estimate = -0.066, p = 0.057).
3 , 7 , 11 In addition, in subgroup analysis according to stage, mucinous histology had marginal significance for stage III ( P = 0.057).
The cumulative incidence of reintervention was also lower in the PVT group with a marginal significance (2.2% vs 5.2% at 5 year, P = 0.057) (Fig. 3 ).
The interaction between time and group demonstrated marginal significance with a large effect size ( F (2, 6) = 4.788, p = 0.057, η 2 = 0.615).
The 3‐year coronary CT angiography examination demonstrated that the patency of thigh SV grafts was higher than that of calf SV grafts, with marginal significance (53/71 [74.6%] vs. 62/102 [60.8%], respectively, p = 0.057).
Effectiveness analysis regarding the behavioural change Lifestyle profile After 24 weeks of intervention (T2), the ITT analysis demonstrated a significant improvement in the physical activity indices of the experimental group participants (∆ M = 0.14 ± 0.49; Z = −2.242; p = 0.025) and a marginal significance in the variation of the index of nutrition (∆ M = 0.09 ± 0.33; Z = −1.903; p = 0.057).
IPA in interaction with Time and Time 2 showed marginal significance with B = −1.13, t (58.2) = −1.94, p = 0.057 and B = 0.06, t (43.6) = 1.90, p = 0.098, respectively, indicating that higher IPA was related to a stronger linear decrease of SBP and a stronger quadratic response.
Similar results but with marginal significance were observed in the Tromsø Study (Linear trend: −4.94, p = 0.057) .
The results of simple effects indicated that the cue type effect was significant only in the fatigue state, F (2, 48) = 5.10, p = 0.010, = 0.18, there were marginal significance on overall performance between cue types when participants were not fatigued, F (2, 48) = 3.04, p = 0.057, = 0.11, are shown in Fig. 11 .
The treatment maintenance duration was longer in the pharmacotherapy group (t = 5.58, p < 0.001); however, this result had only marginal significance after adjusting for age, depression, and GD severity (F = 3.64, p = 0.057) (Table 1 ).
While the piecewise regression identified a breakpoint at 232.5μm, the change in the slope of HOA induction beyond this point showed marginal significance (P = 0.057).
A trend toward lower ΔHbO concentrations in pwMS was also noted, with marginal significance in VR (p = 0.057) and AP (p = 0.053), indicating potential deficits in oxygen delivery and cortical recruitment.
It was notable that the core region harboring DGAT1 gene merely showed a marginal significance ( p = 0.057), although DGAT1 gene has been suggested as being under selection and been reported for many times.
When looking at the values of the conditional effect of the focal predictor at values of each moderator, results showed that the p -values associated with the conditional effects of both Model 1b and Model 1c ( Figure 2 ) were higher and the established significance value and the 95% confidence interval included zero; in addition, a trend to a marginal significance was observed for revenge (i.e., p = 0.057) on the association between grandiose variant and cyberbullying behavior.
Moreover, the difference between attend and ignore M100 amplitudes at baseline achieved only marginal significance ( t [20] = 2.0; p = 0.057) for FEP, where the main effect of M100 enhancement with attention across groups and timepoints was strong ( F [1,48] = 45.8; p < 0.001).
fNIRS analyses There was marginal significance in the six ROI of the prefrontal cortex for the two groups during the dots–triangles task (Hotelling's trace = .505, F (6, 28) = 2.358, p = 0.057).
In the washout groups, no significant correlations were observed, only marginal significance ( p = 0.057) was found for liver EB-GII and bis -N7G-BD.
The “Warm Compression” subgroup (three studies) demonstrated the highest effect size (SMD = 0.305, 95% CI: −0.009 to 0.619), with marginal significance ( p = 0.057).
However, when the first trimester fetal loss was analyzed according to the site of the HP, there was marginal significance (37.5% vs. 6.9%, P = 0.057) between the HP-interstitial and HP-tube.