“marginal significance”

CNLs and TNLs We did not find a significant relationship between CMI and TNL counts ( p = .695, Figure 5d , MS region = 14.072, MS error = 86.559, F = 0.1626; Degrees of freedom from Satterthwaite's method: df region = 1, df error = 10.215), and only a marginal significance with CNL counts (Figure 5c ; p = .0634, MS region = 651.19, MS error = 150.22, F = 4.3349; Degrees of freedom from Satterthwaite's method: df region = 1, df error = 10.22).

Correlation analysis Spearman correlation analysis showed that proportion of people >60 years old was positively correlated with fatality rate with a marginal significance (r = 0.1778, P = 0.064), while Polio-3 vaccination among 1-year-olds was negatively and significantly correlated with fatality rate (r = −0.189, P = 0.044), Fig. 2 .

Our results revealed that the L1 group showed a positive correlation between their task performance and connectivity strengths ( r =0.52, p =0.006), whereas the L2 group showed a similar trend but with a marginal significance ( r =0.38, p =0.064).

The polymorphism rs11977526 had marginal significance ( p =0.064) in allelic frequency.

n [HR: 1.999, 95% CI: 1.622–2.646, p < 0.001], poor performance status [HR: 1.463, 95% CI: 1.221–1.751, p < 0.001], and ALBI grade 2 [HR: 1.531, 95% CI: 1.285–2.823, p < 0.001] were independent predictors associated with a decreased survival; ALBI grade 3 was associated with a decreased survival at marginal significance [HR: 1.525, 95% CI: 0.967–2.38, p = 0.064] in the Cox model.

Postoperative 3-month RUSFs were significantly better in the group that received the intramedullary allogenic fibular bone strut ( p = 0.021; Table 2 ), while postoperative 1-year RUSFs were slightly better in the group that received the intramedullary allogenic fibular bone strut with marginal significance ( p = 0.064; Table 2 ).The mean bone union period was 7.4 ± 2.2 months with no significant difference between groups ( Table 2 ).

Strong exons with DS CTCF peaks had a larger proportion of cases with HNRNPL binding US from CLIP than weak exons, with marginal significance (9 of 381 vs. 2 of 381; Fisher's exact test P-value = 0.064,).

An MR study using a large dataset demonstrated that HbA1c indicated marginal significance ( p = 0.064); however, combined with the UKBB and FinnGen project dataset, the HbA1c indicated a possible causal association (OR: 1.28 95% CI, 1.01–1.61) [ 63 ].

Marginal significance of having cardiovascular diseases was found for smoking ( p = .064), health insurance ( p = .066), and sex ( p = .071).

Treatment with Nezavist (20 mg/kg/dose) reduced the amount of alcohol ingested by drinking the 20% solution (2.16‐g/kg body weight, marginal significance, p = 0.064), and there was an increase in the quantity of alcohol consumed by drinking the 10% solution (also 2.16‐g/kg body weight for the 10% solution, p = 0.151 compared with vehicle‐treated animals) (Figure 1E ).

While pairwise comparisons in the sigma band only reached marginal significance, very large effect sizes suggested higher sigma power during the acclimation night compared to the other conditions (acclimation vs baseline: p =0.064, d = 1.23; acclimation vs 0–100%: p =0.069, d = 1.23; acclimation vs 0–600%: p =0.100, d = 1.14).

Multivariate significant effects were found for Sex and Age Group ( p < 0.001), and a marginal significance for the interaction was found ( p = 0.064).

In multivariate models, β-CTN/m-CK index < 0.5 (HR 2.230, 95% CI 1.106–4.500; p = 0.025) was the independent predictor of shorter RFS, and TSR ≥ 13% showed marginal significance for CSS (HR 2.536, 95% CI 0.947–6.790; p = 0.064).

These include delayed surgical intervention,[ 26 , 27 ] advanced age, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, cognitive function, function or mobility before hip fracture, and number of pre-existing medical conditions.[ 11 , 13 , 28 ] Although we could not find a statistical significance between two groups, there was a marginal significance in one-year mortality between SCH group and control group in this study ( P =0.064).

144 months; Log-rank p = 0.014) ( Figure 3 F), but a marginal significance for apparently early stage (median OS: 10 months vs. 22.5 months; Log-rank p = 0.064) ( Figure 3 D) in SCCO.

In regard to Vocalization during the NI phases, however, there was only marginal significance between the occurrence rate at age 9 months and the responsiveness score at age 18 months (the estimate of standardized regression weight was −.18, P = .064); instead the path between ages 4 and 9 months (the occurrence rates) was significant and the estimate of standardized regression weight was .23 ( P = .023).

PD-L1 positivity in Sq (44%) and La (67%) were larger than in Ad (21%), with a marginal significance (p = 0.064).

The same pattern occurred when the degree of heterozygosity was measured by the microsatellite-specific parameter d 2 , although with only marginal significance values ( P = 0.064 for females collected from tandem pairs vs. both single males and single females, 2-tailed Mann–Whitney U -test).

For example, strong leaf antioxidant capacity was observed in PR-grafted plants although the leaf ABA content was decreased by heat stress with marginal significance ( P = 0.064), and root FRAP was the lowest in MA-grafted plants despite their high root ABA contents under heat stress conditions ( Figures 3E–H , 5A–D ).

Second, in an additional regression model to predict initial C p by using both MVPSS of the hypothalamus and the last C p of the previous trial, we found that MVPSS of the hypothalamus significantly predicted the initial C p (beta = 0.17, t = 3.38, p = 0.0007) after regressing out the effect of the last C p of the previous trial, which affected initial C p negatively with marginal significance (beta = −0.03, t = −1.85, p = 0.064).

In subgroup analysis consisting only of T2–T3 disease, the use of HDR-ISBT showed marginal significance for favorable 5-year LCR (88.9% vs 46.9%, P = 0.064).

Results Outcomes of independent sample t -tests and χ 2 -tests revealed there were no significant differences at T0 between ACT and both control conditions on all included potential moderator/predictor variables, although the difference between ACT and WL in the percentage of people working full/part-time reached marginal significance, with ACT participants working full/part-time more often than WL participants [χ 2 (1) = 3.439, p = 0.064].

The proportion of patients with ASA-PS ≥ 3 was higher in the grade II AC group than in the grade I AC group, showing a marginal significance between the two (31.1% vs. 38.0%; p = 0.064).

As in previous studies, SVO and Honesty-Humility are moderately correlated ( r = 0.22, p < 0.001), but the interaction effect persists on a marginal significance level also when controlling for SVO and its interaction with decision time ( p = 0.064).

In a model adjusted for age, sex, type of surgery, and preoperative horizontal angle of deviation, simultaneous vertical rectus muscle recession showed marginal significance (β = -0.389, P = 0.064).