“marginal significance”

In regard to Vocalization during the NI phases, however, there was only marginal significance between the occurrence rate at age 9 months and the responsiveness score at age 18 months (the estimate of standardized regression weight was −.18, P = .064); instead the path between ages 4 and 9 months (the occurrence rates) was significant and the estimate of standardized regression weight was .23 ( P = .023).

While for cumulative brain metastasis incidence, YVMA insertion also associated with higher incidence of 12-month brain metastasis incidence as 24.4% compared with 3.6% in the non-YVMA group with marginal significance (P=0.064).

Nevertheless, marginal significance (p = 0.0641) was observed for FDiv between the 1990s and 2010s for locomotion function ( Fig 3C ).

Specifically, in the poorly performing model GLS-2 (“AIC” = 67), Chlorophyll during the “June–July” and “July–August” periods showed marginal significance ( p = 0.0642 and p = 0.0610, respectively) ( Table S2 ).

1B ; Student’s t-test, p = 0.0642, marginal significance).

Only haplotype A - G - C of rs12461727, rs73038469, and rs4803406 in LD block B2 in CYP2A7P1 and CYP2B7P1 showed a dose-response pattern and had a p value near a marginal significance level (raw p = 0.0644).

This difference reached marginal significance ( P = 0.0646).

The Fisher exact test indicted a significant difference between the non-polluted sites and P2 ( P < 0.001) and marginal significance for the non-polluted sites and P1 ( P = 0.0646).

During sessions 1–4 group C10 shows a slight improvement of approximately 2° reduction in the mean error, with marginal significance (Tukey’s HSD test, p = 0.0647).

Although these results were not statistically significant due to insufficient patient numbers, QT interval prolongation risk was associated with rosuvastatin use with marginal significance ( p = 0.0647).

All variables were significantly associated with FoG occurrence in the univariate and multivariate analysis except MDS-UPDRS Part I Fatigue score which showed a marginal significance ( p = 0.065 ) in the multivariate analysis.

Moreover, the prevalence and frequency of dental visits for temporomandibular joint disorders were slightly higher in the RA cohort with marginal significance (1.6% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.065).

There is marginal significance between the areas of the subjects treated with delayed ST266 and those not treated with ST266 ( p =0.065) 72 h post SSR.

It should be noted that the two-way ANOVA revealed a marginal significance for an interaction between the group and test condition in the CoP MV ( P = 0.065).

The annual health budget showed marginal significance for facility deliveries ( p = 0.065), suggesting a potential resource effect on maternal health service utilisation (Table 6 ).

In the present study, macular dragging was more frequently observed in the LIO-alone group with a marginal significance ( p =0.065).

In fact, a one-way RM ANOVA with Greenhouse-Geisser correction revealed a significant difference for AI within prism distortions (F (1.86, 20.45) = 5.091, p = 0.018; η 2 p = 0.316; 1-β = 0.74, n = 14 to achieve 1-β = 0.8; post hoc NK test: 0° vs 15°, p = 0.004, and 5° vs 15°, p = 0.024) and only a marginal significance for MT within prism distorsions (F (2.19, 24.06) = 2.987, p = 0.065; η 2 p = 0.214; 1-β = 0.55, n = 19 to achieve 1-β = 0.8, post hoc NK test: 0° vs 15°, p = 0.05).

Moreover, in the original eCura system, SM2 or SM3 tumors also were not independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis after non-curative ESD, but had marginal significance ( p = 0.065).

However, it reduced the richness of the microbiome with marginal significance ( p = 0.065).

Consistent with Munkhbayarlakh et al.’s 2019 published data [ 14 ], ApaI (rs7975232) was also not found in association with the disease in the Taiwanese and Mongolian groups; however, the VDR FokI (rs2228570) GG genotype played significant roles in terms of conferring the risk of asthma and showed marginal significance in the Taiwan group ( p = 0.065).

MiR-422a was up-regulated with marginal significance (P = 0.065) in the low compared with the high BMD group in the array analysis.

Conner’s Teacher rating Scale (CTRS) showed a significant reduction in inattention compared to the beginning ( p = 0.07) and compared to the placebo ( p = 0.049), and the score for hyperactivity of Conner’s Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) decreased with a marginal significance compared to the placebo after 1 month of treatment with Pycnogenol ® ( p = 0.065).

There is a significant difference in how the Tai-chi group and the waitlist group faired on the displacing test ( Z = −2.28; P = 0.023; r = 0.42) and marginal significance the one-hand test ( Z = −1.95; P = 0.065; r = 0.36).

Post hoc tests revealed significant gender differences in trials with moderate payoff ( t 42 = 2.16, p = 0.04, d = 0.65) as well as high payoff ( t 42 = 3.29, p = 0.003, d = 0.99), but marginal significance in trials with low payoff ( t 42 = 1.91, p = 0.065, d = 0.58) ( Figure 2 ).

Global mean network strength during rest showed only marginal significance for positive connectivity between TBI (M = 2,139.24, SD = 332.06) and HCs (M = 1,944.74, SD = 251.40) [( t ) = −1.835, Cohen’s d = 0.66, p = 0.065] and for negative connectivity between TBI (M = 1,183.84, SD = 258.53) and HCs (M = 1,036.80, SD = 167.53) [( t ) = −1.979, Cohen’s d = 0.68, p = 0.057], see Figure 2 .