“marginal significance”

Limited to the cases of preoperative SUV max <3, we find out the statistical significance between PD-L1 expression on OS ( P = 0.0005) and marginal significance on RFS ( P = 0.0693).

However, strong trend for decreased SPARC expression in large tumors (stage T3) compared to stages T1 and T2 was observed and reached marginal significance (p=0.0696, Kruskal-Wallis test) suggesting inhibitory role of SPARC in tumor growth ( Supplementary Figure 1 ).

We next investigated the incidence of NPC between females and males and found 4.9-fold more NPC cases in males (n = 34) than females (n = 7), with a Chi-square statistic of a marginal significance ( p = 0.07; Figure 1 B).

During‐RT ΔMTV (cut‐off: 42%) had marginal significance for PFS ( P = 0.07) and was significant for OS ( P = 0.02).

treated groups compared to controls to day 24 showed marginal significance (between subject effects p < 0.07 and p < 0.09 respectively).

In models not shown, arrest is positively associated with receipt of sterilization (e b = 1.62, p = 0.014); however, the association is diminished to marginal significance with the inclusion of controls ( p = 0.07) (see Table 2 ).

5B ), and proliferating Ki-67 positive cells were decreased with marginal significance (P = 0.07; Fig. 5B ) in aCXCL16-treated group compared with the control group.

Autonomy and User Experience SDT-based autonomy scores were higher in the exploratory group and showed marginal significance after covariate adjustment (ANCOVA P =.07, η2=0.168).

When testing for specificity of the above findings by controlling for each other impact in dyskinesia- and parkinsonism-related neurotransmitter systems using multiple linear regression, we found that among both significant associations between dyskinesia-related grey matter alterations and dopaminergic neurotransmitter systems, the dopamine transporter survived at a marginal significance level ( P = 0.070).

Risk for recurrence showed marginal significance for survival (p=0.07), while site of relapse (p=0.11), treatment modality (p=0.45), and complete resection of recurrent tumors (p=0.22) did not show prognostic significance for recurrent endometrial cancer in our patient cohort.

Stress Induced hyperthermia showed that Chd7 +/Whi mutants had a lesser response (+1.42 °C ± 0.13 versus +1.84 °C ± 0.16 in mutants and controls, respectively) although reaching marginal significance ( p = 0.07).

While there was no significant difference of the postoperative FEV 1 of each lobe between the CSS and single segmentectomy, the value of the CSS was higher than that of the multiple segmentectomy with marginal significance (p = 0.07).

MR Egger regression found mostly non-significant associations, with only the association between SHBG levels and thyroid malignancy showing a marginal significance (P=0.07).

The only predictor that approached marginal significance was current mental health service use ( p = .07), with a higher percentage of clients in the 5-week course not receiving treatment (71.9 %) compared to the other courses. 4.2.

The difference between the survival and visualization conditions reached marginal significance, p = .07.

The level of prosodic boundaries achieved marginal significance (χ 2 = 9.91, p = .07).

We observed that high viral loads (>10 5 copies) at baseline reached marginal significance ( P =0.07) in predicting disease progression among women with LSILs, consistent with Castle et al (2005) .

Changes in knee pain were associated with changes in perceptions of General Health with marginal significance (p = .07).

Additionally, TFS showed a relatively high GDW, consistent with its marginal significance ( p = 0.07) in the regression model.

Two pathways (Phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan biosynthesis; Riboflavin metabolism) reached marginal significance ( p = 0.07).

fMRI Findings Evoked Back Pain Analyses Open-label placebo vs usual care led to reduced pain ratings in the back pain evocation task with marginal significance (β = −6.97 on the 0- to 100-point pain scale; t [78] = −1.84; P = .07).

A history of cancer was reported in 35.7% of the cancer group, compared to 9.6% in the control group, which approached marginal significance ( p = 0.07).

However, when entered into our regression models, this predictor had no significant effect on either perceived arousal (F (1, 217.67) = 0.79, p = .38) or dominance (F (1, 218.79) = 0.59, p = .44) and only achieved marginal significance with regard to perceived valence (F (1, 218.43) = 3.32, p = .07), indicating that female posters (EMM = 3.62, SE = 0.16) tended to be perceived as feeling slightly more positive than male posters (EMM = 3.43, SE = 0.18), albeit not within a conventional level of significance.

Although in the expected direction, this change reached only marginal significance ( t (45) = 1.86, p = .07).

Despite the marginal significance of the difference, a superior OS was observed in the adjuvant CCRT group (5-year: 37.9% vs. 27.5%, p = 0.07), and in subgroup analysis, adjuvant CCRT increased the OS rate of patients with multiple N2 (p = 0.02).