“marginal significance”

On the contrary, the estimated cell count increase rate was higher in the young group at distances between 1200 μm and 2400 μm (young, 29.8 cells/μm; old, 28.4 cells/μm), and the linear mixed model analysis showed a marginal significance in interactions between age groups and the distance from the center of the optic disc in this range (β =1.35; P = 0.068) ( Fig. 2 I).

In addition, a marginal significance was found with patients drinking less than 7 drinks per week, with an OR of 4.1786 (95% CI 0.8995–19.4103, p = 0.0680).

Repeated-measures ANOVA was also performed for the N2 latency of the target, and the main effect reached marginal significance ( F (2,58) = 2.813, p = 0.068, ηp 2 = 0.088).

Hepatic triglyceride (TG) content of Osr1 +/− mice was higher than the WT mice with marginal significance (P=0.068) ( Fig. 3J ).

Force is also statistically significant ( p -value = 0.027), while feed rate shows marginal significance ( p -value = 0.068).

The ADONIS test revealed that habitat structured bird community composition with marginal significance (P=0.068).

Only the diagnostic criteria of ATDH may explain the source of heterogeneity under the recessive model (R 2 = 100.00%, P = .039), and marginal significance was observed in the causality assessment under the dominant model (R 2 = 81.56%, P = .068). 4.

Clusters showed marginal significance ( p = 0.068) in the same direction, and all other comparisons were non-significant.

Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that sinus thrombosis increased the risk of embolic stroke by 10.2 times with marginal significance (p=0.068).

Folin–Ciocalteu TPC showed a moderate-to-large effect size (η 2 = 0.684) but marginal significance ( p = 0.068), likely influenced by limited sample sizes, while acidity, pH, and reducing sugars exhibited only small-to-moderate effects.

Regarding the ADHD group, four of the six above-named SNPs were found to be significantly linked to ADHD with a fifth one (rs7113016) at marginal significance ( p = 0.0685).

Contrarily, a lower rate of overall adverse events was observed in the non-switching group with marginal significance ( p = 0.069).

However, the behavioral merit sensitivity was reduced to only marginal significance ( S merit : beta = –0.05, 95% CI [–0.10, 0.00], t (21) = −1.92, p = 0.069).

Food handler behaviour regarding maintaining cooked food at a high temperature before serving showed marginal significance (67.5%; P = .069 ), suggesting a partial understanding of this precautionary measure.

The inclusion of H B (block 3) did not show significant contribution to the model in all these domains, although marginal significance was found in memory ( β = 0.10, ∆ R 2 = 0.011, p = 0.069).

After making adjustment, household income was positively associated with animal protein intake with a statistical significance in females ( p = 0.030) and with a marginal significance in males ( p = 0.069).

However, the VATS group had a better RFS rate than the thoracotomy group, albeit with marginal significance ( p = 0.069) (Fig. 3 B).

Although the FMS groups showed lower propionate levels compared with those of the control group, only marginal significance was observed (0.82 [0.051] mg/g in FMS vs. 1.16 [0.077] mg/g in the control group, p = 0.069).

Its negative direct effect on offensive VEI (we use β for SDM coefficients throughout) survives spatial adjustment in every bivariate specification ( Table 1 ) and is the only predictor that retains significance in Model 6 (β = −0.416, P = 0.046), though the total effect drops to marginal significance ( P = 0.069; Table 2 ).

In fully adjusted models, the TyG-BRI index in the ECDRAHC cohort showed marginal significance for ischemic stroke incidence (HR 1.13, 95% CI: 0.99–1.30, p = 0.069).

Univariate analysis demonstrated mutated NRAS to be associated with a superior LFS in the entire t(8; 21) cohort, with marginal significance ( P = 0.069).

PESA and PISA values in the control group were higher than in the hospital group but only with marginal significance (p=0.069 and p=0.065, respectively).

The odds of HA-ASM in subjects with PA were 10.63-fold (95% CI: 0.83–135.50) higher, with marginal significance ( P = 0.069) than in those with NFAI.

After adjusting for demographic characteristics (Model 2), the protective association remained robust for the upper-middle SES group (OR = 0.66, 95%CI: 0.54–0.81, P < 0.001), while the high SES group maintained a similar magnitude of protection albeit with marginal significance (OR = 0.41, 95%CI: 0.13–0.97, P = 0.069).

p‐Tau 217 levels measured by the remaining assay platforms showed similar trends across BMI groups, but reached only marginal significance: Fujirebio (0.20 [SD = 0.26], 0.17 [SD = 0.27], 0.10 [SD = 0.08]; p = 0.069), Alzpath (0.40 [SD = 0.27], 0.38 [SD = 0.29], 0.30 [SD = 0.17]; p = 0.103), and Janssen (0.06 [SD = 0.04], 0.05 [SD = 0.04], 0.04 [SD = 0.03]; p = 0.083).