“marginal significance”

However, this particular association was diminished to marginal significance with the inclusion of other factors ( p ≤ 0.10).

The three-way interaction of AI complexity, intangibility, and reliability was found to reach marginal significance [Pillai’s trace=0.074, F (24, 1,359)=1.43, p <0.10, with an effect size of ηp 2 =0.025], implying that approximately 2.5% of the variance of the dependent variable is associated with the interaction of the three factors.

The simple main effect of the content conveyed for the ear animation with voice (voice & movement) showed marginal significance ( F (2,46)=2.74, p < 0.1, η 2 = 0.12).

Significance was defined as P ≤ 0.05 and marginal significance as P ≤ 0.10.

Statistical significance was set at p -value < 0.05, while statistical trend (marginal significance) was set at 0.05 < p -value < 0.1.

To have the latent change model identified, first, we fixed the residuals to zero; second, we fixed non-significant effects of control variables to zero one by one until we obtained the final model with the links of at least marginal significance ( p < 0.10) only.

The thresholds for statistical significance is set at p < 0.05, and marginal significance is set at p < 0.1.

We then examined multiple linear regression models to determine whether race was associated with HbA 1c level after adjustment for variables that were found to differ by race in the bivariate analyses at a P value of at least marginal significance ( P < 0.10).

Furthermore, the association between ICP and mRS was weak and only reached marginal significance ( p < 0.10).

Among these, 18 classified families showed marginal significance after the FDR adjustment (adjusted p < 0.1).

2 b, the difference scores (concrete minus abstract) were significant in the predicted direction for eight of the nine measures ( p < 0.05, two-tailed; cognitive factors reached marginal significance in the predicted direction, p < 0.10).

All tests were two‐sided, with significance defined as p < 0.05 and marginal significance as 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10.

Self‐efficacy showed marginal significance in class 2 ( p < 0.1) but without significant difference between‐class. 4.4.

Substantial associations ( p -value < 0.05) with the eGFR slope were established for GPX3, FERMT3, CFHR1, and RARRES2, while marginal significance ( p -value < 0.1) was observed for SERPINF1, AFM, and elevated Mayo classes; conversely, age, sex, and eGFR did not retain statistical significance.

Among the 21 tested SNPs, 16 showed the same direction of allelic effects in our samples compared with previous studies; 6 SNPs achieved nominal significance ( p < 0.05) at one-tailed test, and 2 additional SNPs showed marginal significance ( p < 0.10).

Subsequently, the binary logistic regression analysis was performed in which nurse‐patient dispute (Yes = 1, No = 0) was the dependent variable and indicators with statistical significance ( p < .05) and marginal significance ( p < .1) in the univariate analysis were included as independent variables to determine the factors influencing the dispute.

Results at the p < .05 level are reported as statistically significant, while marginal significance is assigned to those at the p < .10 [ 39 ].

The result of the KMP database indicated that high expression levels of USP10, USP14, and USP39 were significantly related to a poor OS in PDAC patients while USP18 expression showed a marginal significance (0.05 < P < 0.1) and USP32 and USP33 were not significant associated with the OS of PDAC patients.

Estrogen receptor-positive status (mean cost USD 6548.34, 95% CI 2094.05–11,002.63 compared to estrogen receptor-negative status) showed marginal significance, p -value < 0.1.

14%, with marginal significance p = 0.10).

Sample size control and clustering variables showed marginal significance ( p ≈ 0.10), indicating that methodological rigor and sampling strategies have an effect on the observed results.

Conversely, differences in female and partner ages were statistically significant ( p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively), with habits of tea consumption showing marginal significance ( p < 0.10).

Independent-samples t -tests revealed that such differences reached marginal significance for total creative potential as well as the fluency and originality dimensions ( p < 0.1).

Down-regulation of Atg7 in β-TC6 cells also reduced the expression of complexes I and II, with marginal significance ( P <0.1).

Entered factors were those with at least marginal significance ( P < 0.1) with a univariate analysis.