marginally non-significantp = 0.063
In contrast, case-control studies showed a potential for publication bias, with Egger’s test reaching statistical significance ( p = 0.012), while Begg’s test was marginally non-significant ( p = 0.063).
In contrast, case-control studies showed a potential for publication bias, with Egger’s test reaching statistical significance ( p = 0.012), while Begg’s test was marginally non-significant ( p = 0.063).
Overall, a moderate to large, statistically significant reduction in SBP was noted in the common effect model (SMD = −0.72, 95 % CI: −0.89 to −0.5484, p < 0.0001) but was marginally non-significant in the random effects model (SMD = −0.75, 95 % CI: −1.5486 to 0.0561, p = 0.0638) ( Fig. 3 ).
For the Walking Capacity only model, the difference was statistically significant for medical technicians ( p = 0.026), while the result for medical beds was marginally non-significant ( p = 0.064), suggesting walking capacity plays a more substantial role in access to human resources than physical infrastructure.
Moreover, treatment group comparisons relative to sodium alginate were not statistically significant, although Glycyrrhiza 5% was only marginally non-significant, showing a trend toward faster wound healing (β = −0.082, SE = 0.044, p = 0.064). 2.1.4.
Sperm longevity trade-offs and their effect on sperm responses to female reproductive fluid There was a positive correlation coefficient between random slopes and intercepts in the model of PC1 in seawater ( ρ 01 = 0.79; full model summary in the electronic supplementary material, table S4), although this effect was marginally non-significant (LRT: χ 2 = 3.44, d.f. = 1, p = 0.064).
(2019) [ 19 ] found a marginally non-significant association in univariate analysis (cHR 1.046, 95% CI: 0.997–1.097, p = 0.064) that was lost in multivariate models.
3a ) with non-significant raggedness index (rg = 0.097; p = 0.711) but a marginally non-significant sum of squared differences (SSD = 0.004; p = 0.064), indicate a recent population expansion.
The difference between the groups is marginally non-significant (P = 0.064), two-sample t-test with Welch’s correction (t = 2.07, df = 10.38).
Yet, on an individual species level, the drought-induced 2 H-enrichment in leaf and tree-ring OM was marginally non-significant in leaf OM of AA and PA and very low in tree-ring OM of AP ( P = 0.065 to 0.084, Fig. 2 ).
While the unadjusted model was marginally non-significant (p = 0.065), the adjusted model revealed significantly higher odds among users (aOR = 2.470, 95% CI = 1.365-4.471, p = 0.003).
Egger’s regression test was marginally non-significant (t = 2.02; p = 0.065).
A contingency test on pooled data indicated that there was a marginally non-significant difference among floors (from ground to 17th) ( χ 2 = 13.071; d.f. = 6; p = 0.065).
The relation to feeling comfortable was marginally non-significant ( r s = .225, 95% BCa CI [-.021, .446], p = .065).
Positive associations were detected between pregnancy complications and PD: GDM [OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.03–2.32; HR 2.32, 95% CI 2.02–2.67], PE [OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.26–1.85; HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.39–1.96] and PG [HR 2.61, 95% CI 0.79–6.42], While the association for PG was marginally non-significant ( p -value = 0.065), likely due to limited sample size, the results indicate a compelling trend that warrants further investigation.
For fish consumption during the same period, children with CP reported a higher intake (mean = 1.33, SD = 0.78) than those with ASD (mean = 0.71, SD = 0.76), again with a marginally non-significant difference (U = 88.5, p = 0.065).
Additionally, H15b (CON → PU → CI) had a marginally non-significant mediation effect ( β = 0.080, t = 1.838, p = 0.066).
Marginally non-significant trends were observed in clinical practice (p = 0.066) and administrative function scores (p = 0.054), where male faculty exhibited slightly higher mean ranks.
Concomitant vestibular syndrome ( n = 5) showed a marginally non-significant trend ( p = 0.066) towards less improvement.
The difference between unresolved and organized patients was marginally non-significant ( M difference = −11.27, SE = 5.88, p = 0.066, 95% CI [−23.33, 0.78], d = −0.82).
The most substantial annual growth occurred between 2019 and 2020, with a 12% increase, although this difference was marginally non-significant ( p = 0.0667).
Presepsin Levels in Study Groups When the sum of study participants was included in the analysis, presepsin was found to be almost twice higher in the obesity group than in the control group; however, the difference was found to be marginally non-significant (8.09 vs. 4.45 ng/mL, p = 0.067).
oestroides in dressing form on the 13th day was marginally non-significant ( p = 0.067), but by the 15th day, the differences for this intervention became statistically significant ( p < 0.02).
Furthermore, SG showed a longer, but marginally non-significant DOR compared to TPC among prior CDK4/6i-treated (HR, 0.58 (95% CI: 0.32–1.04); p = 0.067) and fast-progressors population (HR, 0.68 (95% CI: 0.32–1.46); p = 0.324) due to lower number of patients with complete response or partial response in both trials ( n = 155, 116 and 76 for overall, prior CDK4/6i-treated, and fast-progressors population, respectively; Figure 6 ).
However, the population also affected this antifungal effect since its interaction with treatment was also significant in the case of infection intensity (z = 3.58, P < 0.001) and marginally non-significant in the case of Bd prevalence (z = 1.83, P = 0.067).
Additional Cox regression including a quadratic term (baseline HbA1c2), showing a marginally non-significant trend ( p = 0.067) suggested potential nonlinearity (data not shown).