Other notable findings include glucose (carbohydrate) with an I 2 of 11% and no significant pleiotropy (Egger intercept p-value = 0.3449), and 1-oleoylglycerophosphocholine (lipid) with I 2 = 7% and a marginally non-significant pleiotropy p-value (Egger intercept p-value = 0.1477).
For the entropy score, differences with TumblinTurk, Pattanaik, Durand, Drago, YeePattanaik, Mertens, Bruce and Liang were not statistically significant (adjusted p = 0.999), and the comparison with Ashikhmin was marginally non-significant (adjusted p = 0.156).
However, in matched CSCLC and pure SCLC patients, there were marginally non-significant differences in OS (median: CSCLC, 10.00 vs. pure SCLC, 9.00 months; P=0.17; Figure 2E ) and LCSS (median: CSCLC, 11.00 vs. pure SCLC, 10.00 months; P=0.66; Figure 2F ).
These simulations were carried out for response variables that showed marginally non-significant (p < 0.2) differences between treatments.
Kruskal–Wallis test revealed marginally non-significant differences among species ( p = 0.212), though notable trends emerged.
Compared to participants in the highest tertile of pulmonary function, those in the lowest had higher risk of arterial stiffness (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.51, 95% CI 1.09–2.10 for FEV 1 and AOR 1.69, 95% CI 1.22–2.33 for FVC), but the higher risk of PAD was marginally non-significant (AOR 1.64, p = 0.42 for FEV 1 and AOR 1.65, p = 0.24 for FVC).
In the fully adjusted Model 3, Q3 (HR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.79–1.00.79.00, P = 0.043) exhibited a significantly negative association with all-cause mortality, whereas Q2 (HR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.80–1.01, P = 0.070) showed a marginally non-significant negative trend, and Q4 (HR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.85–1.08, P = 0.493) had no significant association.
The sex effect (Wilks' lambda=0.59; F 8,24 =2.05; P =0.08) was marginally non-significant and the interaction between sex and population (Wilks' lambda=0.78; F 8,24 =0.89; P =0.56) was not significant.
However, post-hoc tests did not reveal statistically significant differences between the groups at any measurement time, with p -Values being marginally non-significant ( p -Value = 0.65 in the 12-month measurement and p -Value = 0.56 in the 18-month measurement) ( Table 2 ).
KM analysis for IV CSCLC, IV SCLC and IV NSCLC after PSM After PSM, the mOS and mCSS for patients with IV CSCLC were both 6.00 months, while those for SCLC patients were 5.00 months, there were marginally non-significant differences in OS (P = 0.730; Fig 5A ) and CSS (P = 0.685; Fig 5B ) between IV CSCLC and IV SCLC groups.
When stratum II is also included, the SDR shows a marginally non-significant divergence in the female (female d S : mean = 0.006402, p = 0.89; female d N : mean = 0.004020, p = 0.061; male d S : mean = 0.005052, p = 0.99; male d N : mean = 0.002084, p = 0.94, Mann-Whitney U test relative to the genome) despite the presence of sex-linked markers in this region (Additional File 1 : Fig.
Mean scores of sheltered-site (n = 16) and exposed-site snails (n = 51) differed on RW1 but not on RW2 or RW3, although difference on the latter was marginally non-significant (MANOVA: Box's M, P = 0.894; Wilk's lambda,P<0.001; Levene's test: RW1, P = 0.400; RW2, P = 0.032; RW3, P = 0.250.
940 nm: p = 0.067 (marginally non-significant). 660 nm vs. 810 nm: p = 0.999 (non-significant).
Chronic larval exposure to olfactory cues increased the baseline firing activity of MCs for all treatments ( S3 Table and Fig 4B , dark blue bars of the lower panels), except for the marginally non-significant difference of the group conditioned with cr.1.
There was marginally non-significant association between child loss and fertility desire (OR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.40,1.1).
Actually, two meta-analyses of observational studies [ 23 , 46 ] reported a positive association between increased BMI and CM in males, and our findings are in the same direction, showing a marginally non-significant positive association in males (OR: 1.59, 95% CI: 0.95–2.67, and in females, OR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.32–1.30).
9 It is noteworthy that a recent MR study found a marginally non-significant positive association between CCT and POAG. 10 This suggests that the causal relationship between CCT and POAG may follow an opposite direction compared with what has been observed in most observational studies.
The co-supplementation of vitamin D and protein tended to increase muscle mass, although this effect was marginally non-significant.
There was a marginally non-significant interaction between PC1 and biome ( Fig. 5A , C ; Table 4 ).
[41] found that, intervention women reported a lower, albeit statistically marginally non-significant, adjusted rate of IPV victimization [Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR) 0.86, 95% CI, 0.73–1.01] and a significantly lower rate of perpetration (IRR 0.83, 95% CI, 0.72–0.96) than the control group.
We found a decrease of annual accumulated rainfall from 1975 to 2022 of ~25 %, which was marginally non-significant, probably owing to the high interannual variability in precipitation, which is characteristic of the Mediterranean region ( Deitch et al. , 2017 ).
Compound 14b caused a statistically significant accumulation of PC-3 cells at G 2 /M phase, significantly reducing, in parallel, the percentage of cells at G 0 /G 1 phase (the accumulation of cells at S phase was marginally non-significant).
When lung cancers were removed from the set of four cancers (not shown), the effect sizes remained the same, but the CIs widened, becoming marginally non-significant.
Although marginally non-significant, a trend was observed for appropriate ICD therapy and all-cause mortality (12% vs. 3.5%, p -log-rank = 0.076, Figure 3 C).
However, given the small sample size in the group with LDH levels ≥ 1.5 × ULN at day 183, the differences among the three groups were marginally non-significant at a 5% confidence level.