Barely Significant
← all phrases

marginally non-significant

516 sentences · 516 papers · 1,823 search hits before verification

In the literature

marginally non-significantp -value > 0.061.2× alpha
Funnel plot asymmetry evaluation using the Egger’s test revealed significant asymmetry (t = 3.58; p -value < 0.002), indicating potential publication bias, while Begg’s test yielded a marginally non-significant result (z = 1.87; p -value > 0.06), suggesting weaker evidence against funnel plot symmetry (Funnel plot in Supplementary Figure S1A ).
marginally non-significantp = 0.061.2× alpha
A high frequency of CN8 (mCAF-rich) was marginally non-significant as a prognostic factor for a higher probability of recurrence ( p = 0.06; HR (95%CI) = 4.54 (0.94–22.01); Supplementary Fig. 4 A) and distant metastasis ( p = 0.07; HR (95%CI) = 3.46 (0.91–13.10); Supplementary Fig. 4B) in the Cox regression model.
marginally non-significantp = 0.061.2× alpha
Although there appeared to be some indication of sex-specific differences in Gpc3 expression in liver ( Table S2 ), this was largely due to a marginally non-significant sex-by-genotype interaction in β-actin levels used to normalise Gpc3 expression ( p = 0.06), which generated the pattern shown in Table S2 ; untransformed liver Gpc3 levels did not show a significant sex-by-genotype interaction ( p = 0.13).
marginally non-significantp = 0.0601.2× alpha
For the proximity scores extracted from the random forest trained to predict bond group, belonging to the same bond group was a marginally non-significant predictor of call similarity (gamma regression, χ 2 = 3.5, p = 0.060) and genetic relatedness was not significant (gamma regression, χ 2 = 0.133, p = 0.715) (electronic supplementary material, figure S2, table 3 ). 4.
marginally non-significantp = 0.0601.2× alpha
Marginally non-significant evidence was observed for a positive relationship with K. pneumoniae resistant to third-generation cephalosporins (β = 0.172; 95%CI = −0.008; 0.351; p = 0.060), and a negative relationship with MRSA (β = −0.172; 95%CI = −0.350; 0.006; p = 0.059) and E. coli resistant to aminopenicillins (β = −0.219; 95%CI = −0.449; 0.012; p = 0.063).
marginally non-significantp = 0.0611.2× alpha
2.5 cm and 2.5 cm, respectively; p < 0.05) (Table 4 ).After adjusting for twin pregnancy and gestational duration, the ANCOVA model was marginally non-significant for the overall model, F [ 4 , 25 ] = 2.588, p = 0.061, explaining approximately 18% of the variance in SPL (Adjusted R2=0.180).
marginally non-significantp = 0.0611.2× alpha
There was a marginally non-significant interaction between animation and positive expressions (F(1, 112) = 3.591, p = 0.061, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\eta }_{p}^{2}$$\end{document} η p 2 = 0.031), suggesting a trend where animation and positive expression might jointly influence the amount of visual attention allocated to the virtual humans.