“marginally non-significant”

The association with mortality was marginally non-significant (OR = 1.21, 95% CI 0.99–1.48, P = 0.06).

Incidence by month showed a modest (22%) excess of strokes in November to April (193) compared to May to October (158) (marginally non-significant, p = 0.06).

Marginally non-significant evidence was observed for a positive relationship with K. pneumoniae resistant to third-generation cephalosporins (β = 0.172; 95%CI = −0.008; 0.351; p = 0.060), and a negative relationship with MRSA (β = −0.172; 95%CI = −0.350; 0.006; p = 0.059) and E. coli resistant to aminopenicillins (β = −0.219; 95%CI = −0.449; 0.012; p = 0.063).

In contrast, within the clinical group, the RFQ-C showed negative correlations with BPD features, depression, and anxiety, and displayed marginally non-significant associations with internalizing ( p = 0.06) and externalizing difficulties ( p = 0.08).

saxesenii , whose abundance tended to be higher in Georgia than in Italy, although the difference was only marginally non-significant (GLMER; Georgia: Z = −15.73, p = < 0.001; Italy: Z = 1.89, p = 0.06; Georgia vs.

This segmentation was supported by confirmatory CUSUM tests and a marginally non-significant Chow test (F = 2.84, p = 0.060), indicating structural instability in the trajectory.

Similarly, rosemary extract spraying resulted in marginally non-significant reductions in yolk sac weight ( P = 0.06) and yolk sac-to-chick weight ratio ( P = 0.09) compared to other treatment groups by the end of the first week.

A marginally non-significant positive correlation was also noted for Black patients ( ρ = 0.27, p = 0.06).

52.44 ± 8.74 years), with a marginally non-significant difference ( p = 0.06).

There was a marginally non-significant association of FRi and the primary endpoint, presented per 10 mL/m 2 s increase in the supplemental Table 1 (HR: 0.96, 95%CI: 0.91-1.00, p = 0.061).

Nurses working 1–4 shifts/month had significantly higher engagement than the 5–9 shifts group ( p = 0.008), though the difference compared with ≥ 10 shifts was marginally non-significant ( p = 0.061).

Marital status showed a marginally non-significant trend (p=0.061), where married women had a slightly higher mean score (38.90, SD=6.64) compared to divorced/widowed women (36.50, SD=9.20).

For Insulin-DI, the standard linear model showed a marginally non-significant trend (OR = 1.024, 95% CI: 0.998–1.05, p = 0.061).

This analysis largely confirms the original results in Table 2 , except for nausea, which is now marginally non-significant ( P = .061).

In this study, lens wearers blinked more frequently than controls, although the difference was marginally non-significant ( p = 0.061).

2.5 cm and 2.5 cm, respectively; p < 0.05) (Table 4 ).After adjusting for twin pregnancy and gestational duration, the ANCOVA model was marginally non-significant for the overall model, F [ 4 , 25 ] = 2.588, p = 0.061, explaining approximately 18% of the variance in SPL (Adjusted R2=0.180).

There was a marginally non-significant interaction between animation and positive expressions (F(1, 112) = 3.591, p = 0.061, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\eta }_{p}^{2}$$\end{document} η p 2 = 0.031), suggesting a trend where animation and positive expression might jointly influence the amount of visual attention allocated to the virtual humans.

The rate of pancreatitis was higher when the pancreatic duct was catheterized two or more times, although this difference was marginally non-significant statistically (5.4% vs 2.5%; P = 0.062).

We found a significant association between NREM AHI and overnight change in MST under the NOS condition (p = 0.028); and a marginally non-significant association under the room-air condition (p = 0.062) in a GEE model adjusted for age, sex, education, APOE4 status, and the corresponding evening MST score (n = 51).

Soft tissue health also improved, though the change was marginally non-significant ( p = 0.062), and no soreness or inflammation was reported.

There was a marginally non-significant interaction between treatment and day type ( F 1,493 = 3.51, p = 0.062), suggesting that as predicted, this rebound was larger in the Unpredictable group (post hoc pairwise comparison on deprived days: t 13 = 2.61, p = 0.022).

The interaction between affective disorders and spring was marginally non-significant (b = − 1.11, p = 0.062, adjusted p = 0.083).

Cross-country comparison to track campaign’s effect on Daily active devices The Poisson GLMM (AIC = 9613.3, logLik = −4792.7) indicated a significant immediate increase in daily active devices (DADs) in Cameroon following the campaign (β = 3.133, SE = 0.111, p < 0.001), with a marginally non-significant negative post-intervention slope change (β = −0.001, SE = 0.001, p = 0.063).

In contrast, case-control studies showed a potential for publication bias, with Egger’s test reaching statistical significance ( p = 0.012), while Begg’s test was marginally non-significant ( p = 0.063).

A chi-square test of independence revealed a marginally non-significant association between EF groups and the presence of Atrial Fibrillation (AF), with a Pearson Chi-Square value of 5.536 (df = 2, p = 0.063) and a Likelihood Ratio of 5.757 (p = 0.056).