Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Effects on the number of claims receiving earnings’ compensation (− 0.3 claims [− 10%]; 95% CI − 1.0 to 0.4) and on the total days of earnings compensation paid (− 21 days [− 13%]; 95% CI − 70 to 28) were generally not significant, except for a marginally significant reduction in the number of claims for which the patient received earnings compensation in the first six months after training only.
As presented in Table 3 , the between-level residual variance in the slope of COVID-19 stressors on daily mental health became marginally significant with the addition of level-2 predictors (compared to the significant variance found in the slope-only model), indicating that the variance in the slope was meaningfully explained by the predictors.
Another limitation is that the analyses were based on available data; given that there were marginally significant results, future studies should aim to replicate these findings ensuring that the sample size provides sufficient power to detect the effect sizes reported here.
A significant inverse association was observed for the personal feelings of isolation, and a marginally significant inverse association was also seen for the component of the lack of relational connectedness, with the multivariable-adjusted β coefficients (95% CIs) of -1.26 (-2.22 to -0.31) and -0.93 (-1.87 to 0.00) for the high group compared with the low group, respectively.
As presented in Table 2 , testing associations between schizotypal and psychopathic traits and MSIDT task performance revealed only one marginally significant correlation between schizotypal traits and behavioural reward processing, with the Disorganised dimension correlating with reduced response accuracy towards neutral stimuli, r s (132) = − 0.17, p = 0.045.
After Holm-Bonferroni corrections, the time × group interaction effects on SDMT and d’-CPT were marginally significant (corrected p values: 0.069, 0.096, respectively). 3.3 Intervention effects on the serum IL-6 level For the serum IL-6 level, the LMM analysis showed that the main effects of group (t (72.48) = 0.21, p = 0.84) and time (t (46) = 1.52, p = 0.14) were not significant.
Multivariate analysis showed that perceived negative impact on practical training was the single most important independent determinant of increased concerns (OR, 0.582; 95% CI, 0.446–0.759; P < 0.001), whereas impact on theoretic training (OR, 0.837; 95% CI, 0.697–1.006; P = 0.058) and research (OR, 0.820; 95% CI, 0.668–1.007; P = 0.059) were also marginally significant factors.
Further moderator analyses indicated that (a) for language tasks , TMS induced significant neuromodulatory effects on semantic and phonological tasks, but didn’t show significance for syntactic tasks; (b) for cortical targets , TMS effects were not significant in left frontal, temporal or parietal regions, but were marginally significant in the inferior frontal gyrus in a finer-scale analysis; (c) for stimulation parameters , stimulation sites extracted from previous studies, rTMS, and intensities calibrated to the individual resting motor threshold are more prone to induce robust TMS effects.
There were small and marginally significant improvements favouring CCT relative to control in inattention (SMD = 0.17, 95%CI[0.02 to 0.33), but no significant effects were seen for ADHD total (SMD = 0.12, 95%CI[−0.01to 0.25]) or hyperactivity/impulsivity (SMD = 0.11, 95%CI[−0.04 to 0.27]) symptoms.