“marginally significant”

Soil available P was positively correlated with NaHCO 3 -Pi ( R 2 = 0.15, with a marginally significant level of 0.059; Figure 3B ) and soil NaOH-Pi ( R 2 = 0.19, p < 0.05; Figure 3D ) but was negatively correlated with soil residual-P ( R 2 = 0.25, p < 0.05; Figure 3I ).

The characteristics of the two groups were similar, with a marginally significant difference in their distribution ( P > 0.05).

We fitted the same model as for the shuffled baseline and found that the R 2 of the experimental sets was significantly higher than that of the rotated sets (β = 0.08, SE = 0.03, t = 2.57, p < .05), and that the R 2 increases more over generations in the experimental sets, compared to the rotated sets, indicated by a marginally significant interaction between dataset and generation (β = 0.02, SE = 0.00, t = 4.28, p = .05).

Similarly, the left middle temporal gyrus showed a marginally significant difference (β = 0.0003, SE = 0.0002, p = 0.05).

Regarding the outcomes in these two groups, table 2 shows statistically significant differences in the recanalization rate at the end of the procedure (eTICI 2c or greater) for the HCG (74.8% vs 61.0%, P<0.0001), and marginally significant differences in first pass eTICI 2c or greater for the HCG (48.2% vs 39.4%, P=0.05).

ER-positive status was found in 98.8% of ILCs versus 86.6% of IDCs (p<0.01), and PR-positive status was found in 82.9% of ILCs and in 73.0% of IDCs, with a marginally significant difference (p=0.05).

The present meta-analysis indicated a marginally significant difference between the two groups, with better outcomes with ACE inhibitors (fixed-effects model analysis: OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.49-1.00; P=0.05; I 2 =44%; Fig. 4 ).

The first MANCOVA yielded a marginally significant overall effect of group ( F Wilks (2,110) = 3.02, p = 0.05, η 2 = 0.05).

However, there was a significant difference between groups for onset of symptoms (p<0.001) and NIHSS score at admission (p<0.001) and marginally significant difference for serum triglyceride levels (p=0.05).

In addition, the presence of intracerebral hemorrhage was marginally significant (β = 0.544, OR = 1.723, 95% CI: 1.000–2.970, p = 0.050).

Between-subjects analysis (n = 16) showed a marginally significant reduction in DOMS scores at 48 hours ( P = 0.05 in right legs and P = 0.053 in left legs).

Across provenances, seedling performance tended to decline as annual precipitation at the planting site exceeded that at the provenance origin (ΔPRT; β ≈ −1.26), although this effect was marginally significant ( p ≈ 0.05, Fig. 3 ).

The interaction of the BCKA/BCAA ratio with sex was marginally significant ( P = 0.05); sex-stratified analysis then revealed that BCKA/BCAA was associated with steatosis grade in female participants (OR [95% CI], 1.7 [1.2–2.3], P = 0.002), but the association was completely absent in the male cohort (OR [95% CI], 1.0 [0.7–1.5], P = 0.9) ( Supplemental Figure 1 ).

An association reported by deCODE and Olink was considered as significant at levels of P < 5 × 10 −8 and as marginally significant P < 0.05 and P > 5 × 10 −8 .

Plant height had a marginally significant positive effect, with taller plants tending to cause more secondary extinctions (estimate ± SE = 0.405 ± 0.209, p = 0.05; Table S4 ).

In patients who underwent PCRT, the difference in mean cancer-specific survival between the LE and TME groups was marginally significant (84.6±5.4 months vs. 100.5±5.8 months, P=0.05), which is likely because the mean follow-up period was approximately 10 months longer in the TME than in the LE group.

The difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.05; Table 3 ). 2.3.

In terms of subtype analysis, although the efficacy of the PD-1 inhibitor on acral melanoma patients was marginally significant ( p = 0.05) as compared to the conventional therapy group (IFN+OBS), we still reached a non-statistically significant result, wehile the non-significance among the three groups in DMFS could be caused by the inherently poor outcome of PD-1 inhibitors in BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma patients in real-world clinical practice [ 36 ].

There was a statistically significant moderate positive correlation between total brain volume (%ICV) and EZ-RPE volume in PD group (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.482, P = .04), normal cognition control group (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.514, P < .01) and a marginally significant moderate positive correlation in AD dementia group (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.526, P = .05) ( Fig 3 ).

found that a marginally significant decrease in SBP ( p = 0.05) associated with oral thiamine for 3 months was only observed in subjects (> or = 65 y) with persistently low erythrocyte thiamine pyrophosphate concentrations ( n = 35), and no obvious effect was found in subjects without persistently low RBC thiamine concentrations ( n = 41) [ 20 ].

Individually significant F st values were only found in pairwise comparisons involving Anchorage Island (Binomial proportions test, P <0.05) and this pattern became even stronger when marginally significant P -values (0.08< P <0.05) were taken into account (14/21 versus 0/15 for comparisons excluding Anchorage; Binomial proportions test, P = 0.0002).

In comparison between ICD users and pacemaker users in terms of the SF-36 general health survey, a marginally significant difference was noted in the role of limitations due to emotional health (63 ± 28.6) for ICD patients compared to pacemaker patients (81.8 ± 28.1), (p=0.050).

19 , 20 , 22 – 24 , 28 , 29 , 32 The pooled results indicated a marginally significant reduction in CSM risk among BB users (HR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.81–1.00; Z = 1.95; P = 0.05).

Regarding dental flossing frequency, a marginally significant difference was observed between the two groups ( P = 0.050).

For the MCH, there was a marginally significant reduction post-treatment (29.25 Q1–Q3: 27.4–30.6) compared to values before the treatment initiation (29 Q1–Q3: 27.1–30.4) in male patients ( p -value < 0.05).