Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp =0.051.0× alphagold
In addition, the moderating effect of work meaningfulness was marginally significant ( β =0.08, p =0.05), indicating that the positive relationship between performance pressure and workplace anxiety was strengthened when the level of work meaningfulness was higher ( β =0.81, p <0.001) rather than lower ( β =0.67, p <0.001).
marginally significantp=0.051.0× alphagold
Please rephrase L274 add “only” before the vastus medialis L289 why the result on the Fz site is considered as “marginally significant trend” (p=0.05), whereas in the previous paragraph the result of RMS in BF was not (p=0.05)? ********** what does this mean? ).
marginally significantp = .0501.0× alphagold
IAcc The ANOVA for IAcc revealed a marginally significant and small to medium‐sized time by group interaction ( F [1, 89] = 3.93, p = .050, Wilk's λ = .958, η p 2 = .04) for the HTT (Figure 3 A) with no significant main effects for time ( F [1, 89] = 2.41, p = .124, Wilk's λ = .974, η p 2 = .03) and group ( F [1, 89] = 0.09, p = .771, η p 2 = .00), respectively.
marginally significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
This association became marginally significant after accounting for demographic characteristics (Model 2, OR for most vs. least 0.93, 95% CL 0.86–1.00, p = 0.05; OR for mid-high vs. least 0.82 and OR for mid-low vs. least 0.85 with p < 0.01 for both) and past vigorous PA (Model 3, OR 0.92 for most vs. least, 95% CL 0.86–0.99, p = 0.02; OR for mid-high vs. least is 0.88 and is significant at p < 0.001; OR for mid-low vs. least not significant), but was no longer significant after accounting for health-related covariates ( Table 2 ).
marginally significantp < 0.051.0× alphagold
We also found a marginally significant difference in knowledge change across gender identity (H = 6.44, p < 0.05), with respondents who responded with an identity other than male or female (which includes both non-conforming/non-binary and those who preferred not to answer) reporting the greatest change between pre- and post-assessments (mean rank = 182.34).