“marginally significant”

Gender also had a marginally significant interaction with the within subjects factor F (1, 99) = 3.64 ( p = 0.05) η 2 = 0.04, observed power was 0.47 and this interaction effect is presented in Figure 4 .

Group-specific analyses showed that this relationship was driven primarily by the expert group, which demonstrated a significant medium positive correlation (ρ = 0.4006, p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.2617, 0.5233]), and the Gemini group, which showed a marginally significant correlation (ρ = 0.3121, p = 0.050, 95% CI [0.0007, 0.5684]).

There was a marginally significant effect of gender on R, F (1,158) = 3.90, p = .050.

1 ; the infected brother showed more attrition compared to sham in 9 out of 11 pair-wise comparisons) and infected females also showed a marginally significant difference from controls (Z = −1.75, N = 10, P = 0.05; Fig. 1 ; the infected sister showed more attrition than sham in 4 out of 5 pair-wise comparisons).

Results Neither MMP-2 SNPs nor MMP-9 SNPs revealed significant association with PDR in single-locus comparisons; similarly, MMP-2 haplotype frequencies did not differ notably between groups, although the C-allele of the −1306C/T polymorphism and the C-allele containing haplotype (CGCG) in MMP-2 exhibited marginally significant association with PDR in males (p<0.05, p corr =NS).

The manipulation of context (i.e., context relation or context saliency) did not affect reaction times, whereas a marginally significant main effect of context relation was found in error rates, F (1, 146) = 3.88, p = .05, η p 2 = .03, with a relatively higher error rate when the context was repeated ( M error rate = .12) than when it was changed ( M error rate = .11).

Six OTUs had an abundance of more than 2% of the total sequences, and four of these (OTU00026, OTU00034, OTU00037, and OTU00046, all classified as Ascomycota) showed a significant or marginally significant difference between the Early Stage and the Late Stage (p ≤ 0.05).

A trend towards higher eczema presentation was reported in Group B infants, but the difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.05).

However, “diet” alone seemed to have a marginally significant effect on microglia numbers [ F (1,14) = 4.46, p = 0.05].

To investigate this further, analysis of the continuous measurements (Figure 2 ) demonstrated evidence of a positive correlation of GDF9 with ovarian volume ( p = 0.02; Figure 2A ) and with AFC ( p = 0.004; Figure 2B ), as well as marginally significant evidence of a positive correlation with AMH ( p = 0.05; Figure 2C ).

Two further triple interactions emerged: Group × Gender × Gender of Stimuli, F (1,56) = 4.80, p = 0.03, partial η 2 = 0.08 and a marginally significant Emotion × Gender × Gender of Stimuli, F (2,112) = 3.18, p = 0.05, partial η 2 = 0.05.

Mortality difference by site was marginally significant ( p =0.05; Figure 1 ).

The distribution of years of education between groups is marginally significant, X 2 (1) = 3.84, p = 0.050.

This marginally significant association remained even when all other material hardship indicators are controlled for in Model 5 (b = −0.86, p < 0.05). 3.2.4.

The interaction effect between posture and temperature difference was marginally significant ( F (1,13.98) = 4.40, p = 0.05, β = 16.52, CI [2.06–30.98]).

Differences between treated and non-treated control samples were considered not significant ( P ≥ 0.05), marginally significant ( P < 0.05) ∗ , or significant ( P < 0.01) ∗∗ .

The Pearson’s Chi-square test suggested a marginally significant difference between the number of isolates in the current and previous flowering season’s infructescences ( X 2 = 3.68, df = 1, p = 0.05), but this was not supported by the Mann-Whitney U test (U = 81.5, p = 0.09).

Females were slightly older than males, with a mean age of 43.53 ± 3.01 years compared to 36.63 ± 12.80 years for males, a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.05); regarding ethnicity, the sample was predominantly Caucasian, with no statistically significant difference between the two sexes ( p = 0.323).

There was a marginally significant difference in AST and bilirubin (P = 0.05), which might be affected by the nodules of HCC.

We found that AC016876.1 showed marginally significant lower expression in Basal-like than Her2 patients with uninvolved lymph node (stage ;N0; P=0.05; Wilcoxon test; Figure S1H ).

8.76 ± 3.77 in participants who did not display JTC); this difference was marginally significant [t(51) = 1.975, p = 0.05].

Lesion LSM Lesion LSM produced a marginally significant solution for #CIUs (optimal sparseness = 0.70, CV correlation = 0.24, P = 0.05) and a statistically significant solution for CIUs/min (optimal sparseness = 0.49, CV correlation = 0.36, P = 0.003) but not for %CIUs (CV correlation = 0.15, P = 0.22).

The association between breastfeeding with aeroallergen sensitisation was marginally significant in Cuenca only, but the OR was around 1.0 (Cuenca: aOR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94–1.00, p = 0.05; Santa Isabel aOR 1.02, 95% CI 0.97–1.06, p = 0.43).

For fasting blood glucose, a marginally significant difference between subgroups was observed ( p = 0.05), with the moderate-dose group showing the largest effect (SMD = −1.9), though heterogeneity remained high ( Figure 5A ).

Among the five dimensions measured, Perceived Safety showed a marginally significant trend ( F ( 2 , 145 ) = 3.06 , p = 0.050 , η 2 = 0.041 ).