The analysis of variances revealed a marginally significant group effect ( F (2, 50) = 3.15, p= .05).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
Correlations of factor 5 are either marginally significant (PSD: p < 0.05) or not significant (PC).
On the other hand, the freeze-dried EVs led to a slight, marginally significant GSH increase (116% ± 5, p = 0.05), while the positive control N-acetycysteine (NAC) at 5 mM produced a robust response of 200% (±3, p < 0.0001), as expected.
As we have shown previously, inactivation of A8 has little impact on fasting levels of plasma TGs, cholesterol, and nonesterified fatty acids (NEFAs) ( Figure 5, A and B ) (although a modest, but marginally significant [ P = 0.05] reduction in mean TG levels was seen in the A8-KO mice when compared with WT animals).
This region also shows a marginally significant response to the speech relative to silence contrast, voxelwise t(7) = 2.63, p < .05.
The variable for moderator/developer is marginally significant in Model 1 (p < .05) but does not remain significant in Models 2-4 when the key explanatory variables are introduced.
On the day of oocyte retrieval, an analysis of follicular fluid hormone levels indicated a marginally significant difference in β-hCG concentrations among the eNOS genotypes ( p = 0.050), with the GT group displaying slightly higher mean values than the GG and TT groups.
The analysis revealed a marginally significant condition × test event interaction, F (2,42) = 3.21, p = 0.050, η p 2 = 0.13, but no significant main effects.
When individuals with psychiatric CNVs were removed, these findings became marginally significant ( p = 0.05).
Current income status also showed a marginally significant negative relationship (B =-1.448, p = .050).
However, a marginally significant association (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.00-1.55, p = 0.05) was found with the urinary concentration of DMAs III .
There was a marginally significant effect of session on the N400 effect, (F (1, 45) = 4.1, p = 0.05, ηp 2 = 0.08).
A marginally significant difference was observed between the WM and Primed conditions (t(18) = 2.104, p = .05) such that confidence ratings were slightly higher in response to WM items.
More interestingly and in line with our predictions, we also observed a marginally significant interaction effect between status relevance and 2D:4D ( F (1,105) = 3.90, p = 0.05, partial η 2 = 0.04).
The marginally significant interaction effect between education and severity, β = 0.57, t (1171) = 1.95, p = 0.05, was also tested.
Equality constraints were then imposed upon the autoregressive parameters, which did lead to a marginally significant decrement in model fit, χ 2 change = 9.59, df = 4, p = 0.05.
As shown in Figure 4B , there were significant or marginally significant difference among the three levels (i.e., all-same , bottom-different and all-different ) for both aligned ( F (2,76) = 15.032, p < 0.05) and misaligned ( F (2,76) = 2.717, p = 0.072), respectively.
In addition, there were main effects of Source ( F 1,38 = 5.33, p = 0.03; indicating higher accuracy for self than other conditions) and Distortion ( F 1,38 = 54.82, p < 0.001; indicating higher accuracy for undistorted than distorted conditions), and a marginally significant Diagnosis × Source × Distortion interaction ( F 1,38 = 4.08, p = 0.05).
Compared with sham rTMS group, the BDNF level in active rTMS group demonstrated a marginally significant increase ( p = .05) at T1.
The result revealed a marginally significant pooled effect size (Hedges’ g = 3.108, 95% CI: 0.008 to 6.208, p = 0.050), with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 87.3%, Q = 37.291, p < 0.001), although all included studies reported statistically significant higher expression of SP in teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis compared to healthy controls.
Among former shift workers, each year since the cessation of night shift work was associated with a significant increase in TL (β = 0.01, p = 0.001) and a marginally significant decrease in AA (β = −0.08, p = 0.05) (Table 3 ; Fig. 2 ).
The RiskScore was marginally significant ( P ≈ 0.05) between Grade 2 + 3 groups proving that the more advanced the stage is, the higher the RiskScore would be.
The intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis indicated patients in the GCE group had a lower fasting blood glucose (FBG) concentration compared to the placebo group; however, this decreasing was marginally significant (8.48 ± 8.41 vs. 1.70 ± 5.82 mg/dL, p = 0.05).
Cytoplasmic PER fluorescence also cycled in FB cells (Table 2 ) and SG cells (Table 3 ) with troughs at AZT 7, which were highly significant when compared to the preceding point AZT 1 ( P < 0.01 for both cell types) and marginally significant when compared to the following point AZT 19 ( P = 0.05 for either cell type).
This represented a marginally significant association between CPN and CSS (HR 1.78, p = 0.05).