“marginally significant”

P3 The main effect of group was marginally significant [ F (1, 50) = 4.03, p = 0.050, η p 2 = 0.075]; the HTA group had a larger P3 (2.88 ± 0.18 μV) compared with LTA group (2.39 ± 0.18 μV; Figure 4 ).

The four factor interactions for object orientations, background orientations, target types and scene consistency was marginally significant, F (4, 156) = 3.814, p = 0.05, η 2 p = 0.089.

A paediatric investigation found only a marginally significant (P = 0.050) difference in sodium thiosulfate's protective effect on cisplatin-related ototoxicity for patients with Hispanic ethnicity. 15 There have been, however, a number of pharmacogenomic studies of cisplatin-related hearing loss (reviewed by Hong et al., 17 ) so it is likely that genetic variants more prevalent in certain populations could account in part for our findings.

First, the associations of the selected risk alleles were marginally significant [α (significance level of Bonferroni correction for multiple testing < P <0.05; α=0.05/35 SNPs/three genetic models=0.00048).

[ 7 ] set the cut-off values of FIB and PLT as 2.75 g/L and 215*10^9/L, respectively, and they found a marginally significant relationship between elevated PLT and unfavourable PFS ( P = 0.05) and no prognostic role for FIB.

1 a) and a marginally significant effect on average spot size ( t = 1.97, p = 0.05) (Fig. 1 b).

A 2 (context) × 2 (relative outcome magnitude) × 2 (valence) repeated measure analysis of variance (ANOVA) conducted on the response time (RT) for making the initial choice in the trial following presentation of outcomes, yielded a marginally significant effect of valence factor, F(1, 17) = 4.456, p = .050, with a longer response time after wins (769.495±378.808 ms) than after losses (649.482±227.666 ms).

Briefly, patients with and without VH did not differ for any demographic, clinical or neuropsychological characteristics, except for the NPI total score ( p = 0.01) and the presence of rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder, which was marginally significant ( p = 0.05).

Table 4 shows also marginally significant ( P > 0.05 but < 0.010) trends of higher Vitamin D intake in pregnancy and breastfeeding (85.4% vs. 72.6%, P = 0.087) and in the case of no previous history of Vitamin D deficiency (83.5% vs. 77.0%, P = 0.070).

Higher intakes of yogurt were associated with reduced risk of breast cancer (OR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.46, 0.82) and higher intakes of American, cheddar, and cream cheeses were associated with a marginally significant increased risk (OR: 1.53; 95% CI: 0.99, 2.34; P = 0.05).

Time trends for isoniazid prevalence (increase) and MDR TB (decrease) among new cases were marginally significant ( F = 3.33, p<0.05, and F = 1.13, p<0.05) but in opposite directions.

However, they did show a marginally significant (ρ = -0.091; p = 0.05) negative correlation between reflectance and altitude.

In the realm of inhibitory control, two studies highlighted a marginally significant difference between the NFT and control groups ( SMD = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.00–0.69, Z = 1.96, p = 0.05), with no heterogeneity detected ( I 2 = 0%, p > 0.05) (Fig. 8 A).

However, this effect was marginally significant (P = 0.05).

During presumptive sleep, there was a marginally significant interaction of genotype and age on Type I post-sigh apnea frequency (F 2,64 = 3.113, p = 0.050, 2-way mixed effects ANOVA), driven by a significantly higher sigh frequency in aged rTg4510 mice (1.1 ± 0.3 apneas/min) vs . young (0.6 ± 0.2; p = 0.019) and age-matched nTg controls (0.1 ± 0.1; p < 0.001; Figure 4E ).

The pattern of results was highly similar: a significant main effect of BART condition: F (2,343) = 8.00, p < 0.001, η p 2 = .05, no main effect of Raven’s SPM: F (1,343) = 0.16, p = 0.69 η p 2 < .001, a significant BART condition by Raven’s SPM interaction: F (2,343) = 1.56, p = 0.02, η p 2 = .02, and a marginally significant three-way interaction between BART condition, Raven’s SPM and sex: F (2,343) = 3.02, p = 0.05, η p 2 = .02.

All three messenger conditions produced statistically significant or marginally significant negative effects: President Tokayev ( β = − 0 . 074 , p < . 05 ), the Grand Mufti of Kazakhstan ( β = − 0 . 066 , p < . 05 ), and the Chief Sanitary Doctor ( β = − 0 . 063 , p < . 10 , where marginal significance indicates p-values between .05 and .10).

IAcc The ANOVA for IAcc revealed a marginally significant and small to medium‐sized time by group interaction ( F [1, 89] = 3.93, p = .050, Wilk's λ = .958, η p 2 = .04) for the HTT (Figure 3 A) with no significant main effects for time ( F [1, 89] = 2.41, p = .124, Wilk's λ = .974, η p 2 = .03) and group ( F [1, 89] = 0.09, p = .771, η p 2 = .00), respectively.

Hypothesis testing As predicted, ANOVA analysis (scarcity appeal × need for uniqueness) with purchase intention as the dependent variable indicated that the interaction between the two independent variables was marginally significant ( F (1, 122) = 8.32, p = 0.05, η p 2 = 0.064).

Low anxiety was related to a marginally significant effect of emotion, with poorer performance (that means, i.e., enhanced suppression) for negative compared to neutral scenes, p = 0.05.

Age shows a marginally significant trend, with younger professionals slightly more likely to have adequate knowledge (OR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.95–1.00; p = 0.050).

Among the variants used in the gene-based test, four, including I349F, were marginally significant ( P <0.05) ( Supplementary Table 5 ).

In the model including all men regardless of diabetes status, the association between testosterone and AMI was marginally significant in the age-adjusted analysis (HR = 0.950 95%CI 0.90–1.00, p = 0.050).

Although the main effect of time on SE was marginally significant ( p = 0.050), the effect size (η 2 p = 0.429) was large, and the observed power was approximately 0.75, suggesting that the conclusion is relatively reliable.

We retained DERs that were at least marginally significant (p < 0.05) in this replication dataset, yielding 50,560 (80.1%) genome-wide significant DERs that were also differentially expressed in this independent DLPFC dataset, which were used for the analyses described below.