“marginally significant”

Postoperative nasal packing was associated with reduced rates of diabetes insipidus and thyroid-stimulating hormone abnormalities ( P < 0.05) and a marginally significant reduction in cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea ( P = 0.05).

Differences between the materials were statistically marginally significant ( P = 0.05).

The SMD for surgery versus sham surgery was non-significant for pain-related conditions (n=15, SMD=0.13, p=0.08), marginally significant for studies on weight loss (n=10, SMD=0.52, p=0.05) and significant for gastroesophageal reflux disorder (GERD) studies (n=5, SMD=0.65, p<0.001) and for other conditions (n=8, SMD=0.44, p=0.004).

In addition, trust in people had a marginally significant effect on social empathy ( β = 0.100, p ≤ 0.05), and had a significant effect on subjective well-being ( β = 0.223, p < 0.001).

Overall results suggested a marginally significant interaction between condition and language, χ 2 (3) = 5.84, p = .05, a significant main effect of language, χ 2 (1) = 79.18, p < .001, and a significant main effect of condition, χ 2 (1) = 68.77, p < .001.

Additionally, the interaction with off-farm income is marginally significant (p = 0.050), indicating that the effect of self-provisioning on agroecology transitioning is more pronounced for those with higher off-farm income.

The only SNP that was marginally significant in the meta-analysis was rs3219489 ( MUTYH Q338H), both under a recessive model (summary OR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.17; p = 0.05) and assuming additive allelic effects (summary OR = 1.07, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.14; p = 0.06).

And sexual dimorphism in eye morphology was significant in both size‐related and size‐corrected values in DL ( p = 0.003) ( p < 0.05), and significant in size‐related values ( p = 0.000) ( p < 0.001) but marginally significant in size‐corrected residuals ( p = 0.05) in LS (Table S12 ). 3.1.2 Allometric Growth Reduced Major Axis Regression (RMA) showed that male T. strauchii from Dacao Lake grew significantly faster than females in long torso ( p < 0.01) and snout length ( p < 0.05), whereas females grew significantly faster than males in body width ( p < 0.01) (Figure 3 ).

Second, although the analysis of negative control outcomes showed a marginally significant association between semaglutide 2.4 mg use and sensorineural hearing loss (HR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.01–1.17; p < 0.05), the effect size is small and above 1, suggesting that even if weak residual confounding exists in the current study, it would likely bias our findings from the main analyses conservatively toward the null.

In addition, the moderating effect of work meaningfulness was marginally significant ( β =0.08, p =0.05), indicating that the positive relationship between performance pressure and workplace anxiety was strengthened when the level of work meaningfulness was higher ( β =0.81, p <0.001) rather than lower ( β =0.67, p <0.001).

With the exception of stearic acid, which is not considered proatherogenic owing to the ability of humans to desaturate stearic acid to oleic acid, SFAs only exhibited marginally significant (P<0.05) positive correlations with AI, TI, DFAs, and UDFAs.

The difference between groups for the FEV1/FVC ratio was marginally significant (p = 0.05).

The direct association between screen time and well-being was small, positive, and statistically marginally significant (β = 0.05, p < 0.05, 95% CI [0.000, 0.093]).

Similarly, PTSPC mean score was higher among clinical students than preclinical students (M = 17.2, SD = 5.2 vs M = 15.8, SD = 5.1; p value = 0.01; Table 3 ). In contrast, preclinical students in Nepal had a higher perception of atmosphere than the clinical students, and the results were marginally significant (M = 28.0, SD = 6.8 vs M = 26.3, SD = 5.8, p value = 0.05; Table 3 ).

The only metabolite that maintained a robust, marginally significant P value ( P <0.05) on VTE after MVMR was the triglyceride/total lipid ratio in small HDL (β=−1.91; P =4.49×10 −2 ).

A one-tailed paired t-test comparing DBS-ON and DBS-OFF conditions showed a marginally significant difference (t = 2.04, df = 5, p = 0.05, 95% CI [−0.03, 0.27]; Fig. 3F ), suggesting a possible, though limited, reinforcing effect.

Meanwhile, the direct effect of awe on negative emotions was marginally significant ( b = −0.18, se = 0.10, t = −1.94, p = 0.05), so the mediating effect was almost complete.

Notably, as shown in Table 2 , ACT combined with conventional rehabilitation showed a marginally significant greater improvement in depressive symptoms compared with ACT alone ( p = 0.05). 3.3.2 Anxiety Thirteen studies reported the effects of ACT on anxiety symptoms in stroke patients.

In the model including all men regardless of diabetes status, the association between testosterone and AMI was marginally significant in the age-adjusted analysis (HR = 0.950 95%CI 0.90–1.00, p = 0.050).

Significance was taken as P <0.05, but marginally significant values of P = 0.05-0.10 are also mentioned.

The results showed that the p values for the correlation with HF and death were significant (p<0.05); while the correlation with hard CHD was marginally significant (p=0.05).

However, in deaths from infection, patients with HbA1c≥8% showed a worse survival only in the patients who underwent PD ( P = 0.050, marginally significant) ( Fig 5 ).

Logistic regression analysis controlling for clustering indicated that regular e‐cigarette use was significantly lower in late compared to early users (OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.33, 0.87, P = 0.013), although this difference became marginally significant when controlling for covariates (OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.76, 1.000, P = 0.050).

We observed a weak and marginally significant correlation ( r = 0.16, R a d j 2 = 0 . 02 , t = 1.97, p = .05), which was driven by the shape word condition ( r = 0.24, R a d j 2 = 0 . 05 , t = 2.11, p < .05).

Adding H L to the model in Table 1 (“Isolated Populations”) had a marginally significant ( p = 0.05) positive effect on R but only if the regression was weighted with population size ( Table S3 ).