Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp=0.051.0× alphagold
The SMD for surgery versus sham surgery was non-significant for pain-related conditions (n=15, SMD=0.13, p=0.08), marginally significant for studies on weight loss (n=10, SMD=0.52, p=0.05) and significant for gastroesophageal reflux disorder (GERD) studies (n=5, SMD=0.65, p<0.001) and for other conditions (n=8, SMD=0.44, p=0.004).
marginally significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
The results showed that the three-way interaction effect was no longer significant after inhibition was controlled as a covariate ( F (4, 104) = 2.17, p = 0.078, and η p 2 = 0.077), and was marginally significant after working memory was controlled ( F (4, 114) = 2.46, p = 0.05, and η p 2 = 0.079).
marginally significantP = .051.0× alphagold
The longitudinal profiles of secondary outcomes including HOMA-IR, QUICKI, and revised QUICKI at weeks 12, 24, and 48 for arm D compared with the control arm did not show any significant difference in HOMA-IR; however, the treatment effect of arm D compared with arm A for the longitudinal revised QUICKI was marginally significant (0.004; 95% CI, 0.000–0.008; P = .05), suggesting that telmisartan (80 mg) led to a small reduction in insulin resistance over a period of 48 weeks (see Supplementary data for all summary statistics).
marginally significantP = 0.051.0× alphagold
When comparing the effects of low-frequency low-intensity electrotherapy and manual lymphatic drainage, there were no significant differences, except for a marginally significant reduction of pain which was greater with low-frequency low-intensity electrotherapy than with manual lymphatic drainage (13.1 vs. 1.07 mm) ( P = 0.05).
marginally significantp < 0.051.0× alphagold
The results showed that friendship quality did not play a significant role in predicting loneliness for typically developing students, students with ASD and students with motor and/or sensory disabilities, although there was a marginally significant effect of friendship quality on loneliness (−0.21, p < 0.05) for the entire group of students with SEN (special education needs).
marginally significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
For VO2 peak, there was no significant association in the gross model (B = 9.1; 95% CI: -1.4 to 19.7; p = 0.09), but after adjustment, the result became marginally significant (B = 9.3; 95% CI: -1.5 to 20.1; p = 0.05), suggesting a possible trend toward improvement.