“marginally significant”

Although the main effect of condition was marginally significant ( F 4,99 = 2.45, p = 0.051, η p 2 = 0.09 ), a post hoc Bonferroni corrected t -test did not reveal any significant difference between each condition (all p s > 0.05).

After adjusting for covariates, the CSS benefit of ovarian conservation was marginally significant ( P = 0.051), and the OS benefit was still significant ( P = 0.006).

5 A), though anemones from the acidic treatment displayed a trend of increased respiration rates compared to ambient counterparts that was marginally significant ( P =0.051).

Our findings indicate that among participants with a BMI below 29.9, there was no noteworthy alteration observed in TG levels, while HDL demonstrated a marginally significant increase ( p = 0.051) ( Supplementary Table S1 ).

The surgical technique was significantly associated with the occurrence of Frey's syndrome ( P = 0.002) and showed a marginally significant association with greater auricular nerve dysfunction ( P = 0.051) ( 33 ).

In the total filled area control, cardinality knowledge was the only significant predictor when children saw comparisons involving the 2:3 (β = 0.62; p = 0.005) and 3:4 (β = 0.73; p < 0.001) ratios, while in the 1:2 ratio, cardinality knowledge was marginally significant (β = 0.44; p = 0.051): CP-knowers are better at discriminating two quantities involving 2:3 and 3:4 ratios than non-CP-knowers.

The difference between major and minor music conditions was marginally significant ( p = 0.051).

After correction using the Bengtsson formula, the corrected retinal arteriolar diameter (CVD a ) remained significantly correlated with AL ( P < 0.05, R 2 = 0.07), whereas the corrected retinal venular diameter (CVD v ) showed a marginally significant correlation ( P = 0.051).

Additionally, marginally significant positive correlations were noted between Three-Dimensional Axial BRAVO MRI Sequence (M3D/BRAVO) and WRLCF (rho = 0.354, p = 0.051) and between T2 FLAIR Cube (cm 3 ) and WRLCF (rho = 0.353, p = 0.051), pointing to an association between larger hippocampal volumes and wider right lateral cerebral fissures.

There was, however, a marginally significant interaction between listening span scores and drug (F(1,99) = 3.912, p = 0.051).

The interaction of ROI with reward was marginally significant ( F (2.55,66.25) = 2.880, P = 0.051).

Marginally significant negative correlation ( P = 0.051) between Tajima's D and this latter summary statistic suggests that it captures well the genomic impacts of demography across this period of time.

A marginally significant effect of Aramchol 600 mg was shown in terms of NASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis (16.7% versus 5% in placebo, p = 0.051 OR 4.74, 95% CI 0.99–22.7), while a significant effect on fibrosis improvement without worsening of NASH was not observed.

However, the intervention group was marginally significant in increasing resilience at T2 (β = 0.147, p = 0.051). 4.

The PERMANOVA and PCA results, incorporating all floral traits, showed marginally significant differentiation between the insular and mainland populations of P. japonica (Bonferroni-corrected pairwise PERMANOVAs: F -value = 5.9, R 2 = 0.13, P = 0.051; Supplementary Table S7 ).

The initial IOP of each study participant was also marginally significant by multivariate analysis ( P = 0.051) (Table 3 ).

In the multivariate analysis about management satisfaction (Additional file 5 ), patients over 48 years had marginally significant higher odds of satisfaction with management (OR = 31.98, 95%CI [1.79–571.74], p = 0.051) than patients under 35.

DSM-5 score Analysis of DSM-5 scores showed a marginally significant group × time interaction, F (1, 61) = 3.949, p = 0.051, η 2 = 0.060.

Furthermore, a marginally significant association was also identified between the presence of the chrA gene and MAR index values exceeding 0.2 ( p = 0.051) in our study.

The main effect of compatibility was marginally significant, F (1, 17) = 4.41, p = .051, and it interacted with spatial Stroop, F (1, 17) = 8.04, p = .011.

One‐way between‐subjects analysis of variances showed marginally significant differences in terms of age, F (2, 253) = 3.01, p = .051, and habitual violent video game play, F (2, 253) = 2.99, p = .052.

Also a marginally significant Group × Lag interaction was found, F (3, 78) = 2.71, MSE = 51.77, p = .051, η 2 p = .09, such that particularly at lags 2 and 3, non-blinkers seemed to show fewer order reversals than blinkers did.

The analysis revealed significant main effects of face age, F (1,34) = 6.36, p <.05, η 2 = .158, and orientation, F (1,34) = 46.71, p <.001, η 2 = .579, which were both qualified by a marginally significant Face Age × Orientation interaction, F (1,34) = 4.07, p = .051, η 2 = .107.

Moreover, after applying the modified Bonferroni’s method to adjust possible errors during multiple comparison, the correlations of DMO levels to glucose (adjusted p = 0.047), or DMO C/D ratios to insulin (adjusted p = 0.049) remain significant statistically, but the correlation between levels of DMO and homocysteine became marginally significant (adjusted p = 0.051).

Interestingly, the thumb representation presented a main effect of CONTEXT (marginally significant: F 1,18 = 4.34, p = 0.051, partial η 2 = 0.194), while this effect was not significant for the pinky representation (F 1,18 = 1.82, p = 0.194, partial η 2 = 0.089).