“marginally significant”

There was also a marginally significant three-way interaction between task type, F1, and F2 (b = −0.07, p < 0.051).

The 500–700 ms time window—The mixed-effects modelling’s fitting results showed that the main effect of the condition was marginally significant ( χ 2 (2) = 3.80, p = 0.051), and post hoc comparison suggested that the average amplitude caused by aspect violation sentences and by correct sentences was marginally significant ( β = −1.27, SE = 0.66, z = −1.94, p = 0.053).

ANOVA of the number of anticipatory responses indicated significant main effects for block (F(1, 245) = 35.84, MSE = 1.11, p < .001, η 2 p = .128) and exposure (F(1.85, 453.86) = 39.21, MSE = 2.84 (Greenhouse–Geisser correction for deviation from sphericity), p < .001, η 2 p = .138) as well as a marginally significant main effect of UHR status (F(1, 245) = 3.84, MSE = 5.70, p = .051, η 2 p = .015).

Differences in active coping also reached statistical significance between groups ( F = 2.37; p = 0.038), highlighting a marginally significant difference between women aged 18–24 ( M = 20.63; SD = 3.53) and those aged 30–34 years ( M = 21.65; SD = 3.15) ( p = 0.051).

Hopelessness was marginally significant for females (B = 0.042, SE = 0.021, p = 0.051) and non-significant for males (B = 0.029, SE = 0.021, p = 0.166).

When we repeated the ANOVA only on epochs 2 and 3, where a benefit of context repetition would be expected, the main effect of configuration became marginally significant (F(1,12) = 4.721, p = 0.051).

Paired samples t-tests revealed that while neither the HC nor the non-responders had a significant change in amygdala activity to words of either valence following SSRI intervention (ts < 0.38, ps > 0.71, ds < 0.34), responders had a significant increase in amygdala activity to positive words (t(10) = 5.15, p < 0.001, d = 3.2) and a marginally significant decrease to negative words (t(10) = 2.19, p = 0.051, d = 0.93).

In contrast to 30 mg QD dacomitinib and 80 mg QD osimertinib, we observed a marginally significant improvement after 1 year of treatment ( P = 0.051) after multiple comparison corrections.

This association remains marginally significant when adjusting for age, energy intake, BMI, job status, thyroid, and smoking status (OR = 1.08; 95% CI 1.00, 1.16; P = 0.051).

Here the main effect of ɑ-syn pff was more pronounced ( F (1,84) = 7.55, p = 0.0070), and there was a marginally significant ɑ-syn pff x age x sex interaction (F1,84 = 3.91, p = 0.051). ɑ-syn pff significantly reduced this ratio at 3 months post-injection in aged females ( p < 0.05) and in all aged mice combined ( p < 0.01) (Fig. 2 D).

Results showed that the correlation between predictive scores and residuals was marginally significant ( r = 0.20, p = 0.051), suggesting that the current predictive model is largely associated with state anxiety, independent of trait anxiety.

In the LRRC32 MO-injected fish, there was a marginally significant increase in TTA (30% increase, P = .051), whereas TSA was reduced by 29% compared with controls ( P = .034).

Comparing the STAI scores in study subjects and controls, results on both subscales (STAI-S and STAI-T) were higher in the study group; however, the difference did not reach statistical significance, although the results of STAI-S scores were marginally significant ( P = 0.051).

For the P400, we observed a marginally significant interaction between FaceGender and Emotion ( F (1,29) = 4.16, p = 0.051, η p 2 = 0.13; see Figure 3 ) between 300 and 500 ms as defined a priori.

Furthermore, having had ≥2 casual male partners had a marginally significant association with HIV seroconversion (aHR = 2.9, 95%CI = 1.0–8.4, p = 0.051).

= 1.01, 3.56), each individual genetic polymorphism did not have significant predictive power by itself, with the exception of one marginally significant gene ( CD2AP , OR = 1.69, P < .051).

Feculent ascites was a marginally significant factor (P = 0.051).

There were marginally significant interactions among benzodiazepines, stimulus, and task during the early P3 phase (450–550 ms) for the central area ( F 2, 49 = 3.156, P = 0.051, η 2 = 0.114) and significant interactions for occipital area ( F 2, 49 = 3.347, P = 0.043, η 2 = 0.120).

Taken alone, this correlation was marginally significant (P = 0.051), but was non-signficant following Benjamini-Hochberg adjustments for multiple testing (P = 0.322).

There was a marginally significant difference in age between VS (41.8 ± 16.8) and MCS (52.9 ± 13.8) participants ( p = 0.051).

Post-hoc comparisons with Bonferroni correction revealed that, considering congruent and incongruent trials together, there was a marginally significant difference in RTs between Block 3 ( M = 547.79, SD = 15.99) and Block 1 ( M = 601.42, SD = 18.99, p = .051), and a significant difference between Block 4 ( M = 570.67, SD = 14.82) and Block 1 ( p < .05).

Moreover, the simple main effects of flow direction on the 4–6- and 7–9-month-old infants and on the adults were significant ( F (1,114) = 26.52, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.19; F (1,114) = 19.71, p < 0.001 , η p 2 = 0.15; and F (1,114) = 10.75, p = 0.002 , η p 2 = 0.09; respectively); it was marginally significant on the 10–12-month-olds ( F (1,114) = 3.89, p = 0.051 , η p 2 = 0.13).

As displayed in the Supplementary Materials (Table S4 ), all findings remained significant ( p < 0.01), except for the direct daily association between NO 2 and fatigue which became marginally significant ( p = 0.051) but continued to be qualified by the significant interaction.

Lack of PPE training indicated a marginally significant association with increased odds of reporting a SARS-CoV-2 infection (AOR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.00–1.58, p = 0.051) compared to those who were trained in using PPE.

The bootstrap method indicated that the indirect relationship of fathers’ work engagement with their child’s emotional and behavioral problems was marginally significant for fathers (−0.032; 95% CI between −0.029 and −0.001, p = 0.051) and non-significant for mothers (−0.028; 95% CI between −0.027 and −0.001, p = 0.077).