“marginally significant”

As shown in Figure 7 , the correlations between the investigated phytochemicals were positive and highly significant at p < 0.05, with the exception of the correlation between flavonoids and carotenoids, which was marginally significant ( p = 0.0517).

Differences in Fe concentration among the three growing treatments could be considered marginally significant ( F 2.000, 6.368 = 4.8853, P -value = 0.05177).

And the difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.0518, log-rank test).

Analyses for midline electrodes revealed a marginally significant effect of Position [ F (1, 17) = 4.37, p = 0.05183] and an interaction of Position × Electrode [ F (3, 51) = 5.46, p < 0.05].

Edge density within a 250 m buffer distance had an unimodal effect that was marginally significant ( p = .0519) (Figure 2d ).

The recessive model also retained a marginally significant association ( p = 0519, OR = 1.899, 95% CI, 0.995–3.624) with GBC.

Among them, atrial fibrillation showed a positive association with the risk of death (coefficient = 0.0142; p = 0.0489), while any past stroke also demonstrated a positive and marginally significant association (coefficient = 0.0259; p = 0.0519).

Pairwise Tukey comparisons revealed that the difference in telomere change in neonates between the warmest treatment and each of the two cooler treatments was marginally significant (25–27°C: β=0.0115±0.0048, t -ratio 46.0 =2.406, P =0.0519; 23–27°C: β=0.0114±0.0050, t -ratio 49.0 =2.283, P =0.0677; 23–25°C: β=−0.0001±0.0049, t -ratio 45.6 =−0.024, P =0.9997).

Social anxiety as measured with the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale also showed a clear improvement, with a between‐group difference favoring CBT ( P = 0.007), which is still marginally significant at 3‐month follow‐up ( P = 0.052).

The effect for the TAX condition was marginally significant [ t (13) = 1.75, p = 0.052].

This analysis indicated that there was a marginally significant effect of condition (β = −.36, SE = .18, z = −1.94, p = .052), where participants were slightly more accurate in the phonological condition compared with the semantic condition.

After removing the non-significant interaction term from the regression, a main effect of race was found for the R hippocampus (B = -.17; p = .012), L hippocampus (B = -.20; p = .003), and was marginally significant for the L amygdala (B = -.13; p = .052), wherein Whites had greater volumes than AAs.

There was a marginally significant interaction between time and group F (4, 55) = 2.52, p = .052, η p 2 = .16, with ratings being higher in the Early Mismatch group than in the Late Mismatch group at both first and last time points, p = .001 and p = .002, respectively.

For valence ratings, a marginally significant main effect of Stimulus Type was observed, F (1, 28) = 4.13, p =.052, η2 = 0.13, with CS+ rated as more negative.

There was a marginally significant ( P < 0.052) genotype by nutrient interaction effect and strong main effects on relative sorghum biomass loss ( Table 5 ).

The Rht1 haplotype effect on AR was significant in greenhouse experiments for groups RE-NIL1, CM and FRxRE and in fields experiments for RE-NIL1, CM and MI and marginally significant in the green house for MI ( p = 0.052) and in field tests for FRxRE ( p = 0.086).

However, a marginally significant difference was found between treatments (F (1,28) = 4.11, p = 0.052), and a significant one within treatments (F (1,28) = 7.73, p = 0.01).

The main effect of the prime-target hemifield was marginally significant, F (1, 10) = 4.85, p = 0.052.

Furthermore, the analyses revealed a marginally significant positive association between the percentage of streets within 100 m and overweight/obesity (OR = 1.09 (95% CI 1.00–1.18), p = 0.052).

A marginally significant main effect of groups was also observed [ F (2, 94) = 3.05, p = 0.052, ηp 2 = 0.06], suggesting that musicians, music learners, and non-musicians had different RTs, with a medium effect size.

Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) showed a marginally significant reduction of myocardial infarction (16%, P = 0.052) with insulin or sulfonylurea treatment compared with dietary treatment, despite greater weight gain.

Pairwise comparisons without P -value adjustment showed significant differences between no-magnet control and head treatments ( t =2.642, P =0.012) and between head and posterior carapace treatments ( t =−2.161, P =0.036), as well as a marginally significant difference between head and mid-carapace treatments ( t =−2.004, P =0.052), all in keeping with the hypothesis that magnetoreceptors are in the head.

These analyses did not detect a significant density effect on invasive snails ( p = .336) but did reveal a marginally significant effect of density treatment on embryo production for native snails ( p = .052; Table 5 ).

Although stable disease was less common in patients with complex THID compared to those with simple THID (1.4% vs 5.4%), the difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.052) (Table 2 ).

A marginally significant effect of CS was also emerged (F=3.979, p =0.052) in the PR.