“marginally significant”

The effect was positive and marginally significant in the conservative target condition, b = 0.06, SE = 0.03, t (410) = 1.95, p = .052.

However, analysis of KTR detected a marginally significant difference over time (F[4,48] = 2.864, P = .052, eta 2 [g] = 0.074) but not between the groups or the interaction of group and time.

Specifically, there was a marginally significant decrease in we-words from 3 to 2 weeks before the NSSI event ( M decrease = −0.16, SE = 0.08, t = −1.96, p = 0.052), which stayed at a similar frequency level in the week immediately preceding the event.

Moreover, the difference across early and late time windows was marginally significant (mean (ΔR 2 ) = 0.0096, p = 0.052; Figure 6 ).

The pistil tends to be longer than the stamen (about 0.3 mm longer), and this difference is marginally significant ( t = −2.07, P = 0.052; Table 1 ).

For the group aged ≥80 yr at death, the increase in the CPP of LPC from 4.8% (95% CI 0–10%) in 1962–1976 to 15% (95% CI 9.7–20%) in 2007–2020) was marginally significant ( p = 0.052).

Nevertheless, a marginally significant effect of social influence was found also in the Het Group ( β = 0.02 , χ 2 (1) = 3.78, P = 0.052).

Finally, pregnancy was a marginally significant predictor suggesting that those with a history of pregnancy were 59% less likely to report multimethod use ( P = .052).

SCH had a marginally significant effect on OT ( β = 0.08, p = 0.052) ( Table 2 ).

Notably, however, sex was the only other covariate significantly associated with risk aversion (estimate = -1.49, SE = 0.39, p < 0.001), although income had a marginally significant inverse relationship with risk aversion (p = 0.052).

We did find marginally significant overexpression of ALS gene transcripts in weedy compared with wild individuals ( p = .052), suggesting constitutive overexpression of ALS may provide a survival advantage to weedy individuals in agriculture fields.

There was a marginally significant difference in the proportion of severe visual loss with a visual acuity of 20 / 200 or less at the final visit among ON subgroups ( p = 0.052).

There were a significant higher percentage of participants who tested positive for MAU with A1C ≥ 53 mmol/m ( p = 0.032), hypertension ( p = 0.007) and marginally significant for BMI ( p = 0.052) as compared to those with normal albuminuria.

A marginally significant effect of CS was also emerged (F=3.979, p =0.052) in the PR.

– However, no correlation strength was found between NA/MHMA ROC or AD/MHMA ROCs and high histamine ROC (Table 3 ), but – a marginally significant negative relationship was found between histamine and free Cu/Zn ( n = 134, rho = −1.95, P = 0.052) that was supported on SEM analysis by a negative coefficient between these two variables ( n = 134, z = −1.95, P = 0.052).

17 , 21 As with JNK inhibition, this had no statistically significant effect on IL‐6 mRNA at pH 7.4 (Figure 3C,D ) but gave a marginally significant blunting (0.87 ± 0.03 fold decrease, p = 0.052) of the IL‐6 mRNA response at pH 7.1 (Figure 3D ).

A planned contrast on mean BtBC revealed a marginally significant difference between “CS+ HS > CS‐ HS ” and “CS+ LS > CS‐ LS ” (independent t ‐test, t = 1.98, P = 0.052; Figure 6B , right panel).

In line with this, a marginally significant decrease in depression measured with the HAM-D (Fig. 3 B) was found for this time period ( t (12) = 1.75, p =.052).

Much debate was ignited by a marginally significant 16% ( P = 0.052) reduction in fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction in the UKPDS where chlorpropamide, glibenclamide, or glipizide were used as initial therapy in newly diagnosed uncomplicated diabetic patients ( 1 ).

Results showed a marginally significant effect of Experiments [ F (2,57) = 3.123, p = 0.052, η p 2 = 0.099].

The effect for the TAX condition was marginally significant [ t (13) = 1.75, p = 0.052].

Mean log parasite density was significantly lower in lowland urban by 0.371 (95%CI: 0.188–0.554, p < 0.001) and marginally significant in highlands (coef = -0.268; 95%CI: -0.539 – -0.002, p = 0.052), compared to lowland rural.

Furthermore, the [-per][-pro] group, but not the [+per][-pro] group, produced significantly reduced T2-T5 distinction in F0 offset compared to amusics ( p = .023), and the difference between the [-per][-pro] group and amusics was marginally significant for F0 slope ( p = .052).

These analyses did not detect a significant density effect on invasive snails ( p = .336) but did reveal a marginally significant effect of density treatment on embryo production for native snails ( p = .052; Table 5 ).

The differences in CV between the groups were marginally significant ( P = 0.052) (Table 3 ).